Reply With Quote
You asked a question and you got an answer. How long are you going to play this game? You ask where an ancestor came from, receive an answer, then ask who the ancestor's ancestor came from. It's getting very lame.
Checkmate atheist.
You asked a question and you got an answer. How long are you going to play this game? You ask where an ancestor came from, receive an answer, then ask who the ancestor's ancestor came from. It's getting very lame.
Like robdiaz did several times before? Lol re ed Uncle Tom.damn y'all got redzero resorting to posting wiki links, sad. anyways, i can't wait for the new pair or jordan's evolution is going to leave on my doorstep tomorrow
Dude, that has been my original question for the longest time. How can evolution be a fact when we don't even know where the fukin genus came from?
Then your original question is moronic because evolution doesn't just apply to human beings.
Jesus Christ, you people are ing stupid.
you gonna hear a big bang in the morning and viola just like this:damn y'all got redzero resorting to posting wiki links, sad. anyways, i can't wait for the new pair or jordan's evolution is going to leave on my doorstep tomorrow
So he can't answer the question.
I'm just waiting patiently for someone to interject the alien seeding theory. Wouldn't it be ironic if the aliens turned out to be flying pigs? Or worse, those flying monkeys from Oz? Those monkeys were creepy!
I just did answer the question, moron. Your premise is flawed, because humans aren't the only species that evolved. You are looking at evolution in a vacuum for no reason.
Woo, I know this. I wanna know what led to the first primate, not the first human. Did it just appear out of nowhere? What did it evolve from? Have any of these fossils been found?
If you knew that, you would not have asked such a stupid question. Period.
No, you do not. If you actually wanted answers, you would have looked them up a long time ago. I gave you a link to talk origins, which answers several questions that you asked here. Did you try looking up answers there? No. Why? Because it's biased? Do you know how dumb you sound? Is a Physics book biased when it claims that things fall when they are dropped? And if you're so against bias, why do you think asking these questions to people on message boards who accept somehow prevents bias?I wanna know what led to the first primate, not the first human.
Nothing just appeared out of nowhere. If you knew what evolution was, you wouldn't ask such a stupid ing question.Did it just appear out of nowhere?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primate...ionary_historyWhat did it evolve from? Have any of these fossils been found?
And before you post, "HURR THEY THINK THEY DON'T KNOW!" I will ask you this: Are you willing to jump off the top of a tall building with absolutely no means of landing safely? Why not? Is it because you are afraid that gravity will pull you down to the ground, killing you? Why would you be afraid of that? Scientists don't know all there is about gravity, so that must mean that it's not real, right? That's the exact same line of reasoning that you are using.
"But we know that gravity occurs."
So? We know that evolution occurs, too. Why do you reject the theory of evolution but accept the theory of gravity?
Koolaid_Man's parents having sex....
So now we came from lemursAnd no, we don't know that evolution occurs, has anyone ever observed evolution?
I have never seen two people high five each other's ignorance more than kool and rob.
If evolution is so wrong and ridiculous, why do you resort to strawmen to make your argument?So now we came from lemurs
http://talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-misc...s.html#observeAnd no, we don't know that evolution occurs, has anyone ever observed evolution?
Yet again, you asked a stupid ing question that was already answered by talk origins.
Again, you are a living, breathing cliche. You are using damn-near every single argument against evolution that has been brought up and discredited decades ago. Your worldview is so threatened by it that you are incapable of looking at it rationally.
Nothing in the real world has ever been rigorously proved, or ever will be. Proof, in the mathematical sense, is possible only if you have the luxury of defining the universe you're operating in. In the real world, we must deal with levels of certainty based on observed evidence. The more and better evidence we have for something, the more certainty we assign to it; when there is enough evidence, we label the something a fact, even though it still isn't 100% certain.
and the coelacanth was thought to have evolved into roughly its current form approximately 400 million years ago.[6
this mother er said evolution
Oh look! More reading comprehension failures.
It always amuses me how theists have impossibly high standards of evidence for evolution, the big bang, and abiogenesis, while at the same time having absolutely no standards at all when it comes to their respective religions.
doesn't that pretty much up the entire theory
in before it didn't need to evolve. evolutionist are so full of , they can pretty much bend the fukin rules or make up their own rules when they want
No, it doesn't. Alligators, crocodiles, and roaches have been around for millions of years and are generally unchanged.
Explain to me what you think evolution is, and then explain how you think the coelacanths disprove it.
What rule would that be? When will you stop making up ?in before it didn't need to evolve. evolutionist are so full of , they can pretty much bend the fukin rules or make up their own rules when they want
so according to evolution, if humans keep jumping into water they will eventually be able to breathe underwater
You're just asking the same stupid questions a million times, with slight variations. You already know that that is not what evolution claims.
It's been clear for a long time that you don't know anything about evolution and simply have no desire to learn. You feel that it threatens your belief in an invisible sky daddy, so you misinterpret it (sometimes deliberately and sometimes through sheer ignorance) in a vain attempt to make your opponent look stupid. You are lame and you take pride in your complete ignorance.
The most ironic thing is that you claim to not want to explain your religious views, because you fear that atheists will pick them apart no matter what you post. It's ironic because not only do you automatically reject every claim that atheists make, you put words in their mouths and attack claims that they don't even make more than you attack claims that they actually do make.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
