Um lots of people here acknowledge your hillary support brehI think you like to argue for the sake of it. I didn't even vote for the lady. Yet you choose to make me a supporter of her. OK man I'm not going to keep going back and forth with this silliness.
Enjoy the game. I will be switching over and do the same as well.
Enjoy the game as well man
Well you are one, the other one is sanityannex which everyone knows he has an agenda against as per all his threads about her and articles and the other one is spursraider. That's just 3. That's hardly "lots."
But knock yourselves out man. Keep doing it.
Why? He's still not on track for 1237 even pulling 85 of the 95 delegates tonight.
An ISIS attack here could make Trump a lot stronger in the general.Ladies and gentlemen, hillary will be president
Ok
Looks like Trump will get somewhere from 83-86 delegates out of NY.
http://www.cnn.com/election/primaries/states/ny
Irregularities overshadow U.S. presidential vote in New York City
Source: Reuters
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...-idUSKCN0XG130Democrat Hillary Clinton and Republican Donald Trump were favored to win their parties' U.S. presidential nominating contests in New York state on Tuesday, but voting was overshadowed by official confirmation that more than 125,000 people were missing from New York City voter rolls and reports of other irregularities.
New York City's comptroller ordered an audit of the city elections board after it confirmed the people's names had been removed from voter rolls.
"The people of New York City have lost confidence that the Board of Elections can effectively administer elections and we intend to find out why the Board of Elections is so consistently disorganized, chaotic and inefficient," Comptroller Scott Stringer said in a statement.
Faulty ballot scanners, late-opening polling locations and scant staffing were among the other problems that Stringer cited in a Tuesday letter to the board. He demanded swift attention.
What a surprise, those voters just happen to reside in Brooklyn, Senator Sanders home territory. I am shocked I tell you, shocked to see election stealing in New York
Bernie is one indictment away from the White House....
Poll: More Than Half Of Voters Wouldn't Back Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Hillary Clinton
Source: CBS NEWS
By Emily Schultheis CBS News April 18, 2016, 6:22 PM
Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-mor...llary-clinton/It's a common phrase in a tough election to say someone's choosing between the "lesser of two evils" when it comes to candidates--and new polling indicates that voters largely see themselves facing that kind of choice in the general election this fall.
Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed said they couldn't see themselves voting for GOP front-runner Donald Trump, according to an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released Monday evening. For Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, the figure was almost as high: 61 percent said they couldn't see themselves backing him; 58 percent said the same of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. The figures were slightly lower for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (48 percent) and Ohio Gov. John Kasich (47 percent).
Those convictions about not voting for top candidates come from voters' highly negative views of those candidate. Overall, 65 percent of voters have a negative view of Trump, compared with 24 percent who have a positive view -- which NBC notes makes him the least popular presidential candidate in the history of their polls.
Cruz and Clinton are also far underwater when it comes to image: their net favorability ratings are -23 points and -24 points, respectively. For Cruz, 26 percent of voters view him positively, compared with 49 percent who view him negatively; for Clinton, 32 percent view her favorably, compared with 56 percent who view her unfavorably.
So much for Dems being above voter disenfranchisement. absolutely reeks, but good luck proving anything or even finding it in the history books a decade from now.
Ill never vote for Hillary. I will feel almost as nasty voting for Trump but he doesnt have a super PAC and isactually against the TPP (not just saying so like Mrs Wall Street) so he barely edges out the shill.
Sad.
Pinning your hopes on an old lady getting arrested in order to win the election.
I find it ironic that Bernie beats all 3 GOP candidates but cant run against Hillary.
BTW I'm getting the feeling Bernie is angling for a third party run along the lines.
Say o to Trump as president.
Not Ironic.... with a closed primary.......in the general independents would swing the election...
but....technically, she did break the law...I don't know how far the FBI and the Obama justice dept. will take it though....
Sad truth is Bernie is way too nice to do some vindictive like that. He hasnt attacked Hillary's disgusting personal character attributes and lies at all like Trump certainly will, for example. He has repeatedly said any democrat is better than any republican nominee, too.
I assume Bernie is taking this at least to California, where he will make his decision about dropling out based on how big or small his W/L is.
Neither can I. She gets more repulsive each day. I'll probably just write the Bern's name in. Or if Trump retracts some of the he's said about Mexicans I'd probably vote for him.
How can you fervently support someone like Bernie Sanders while claiming that you'll vote for someone who is basically the opposite of everything he stands for?
whom does it benefit to shut undeclared voters out of primary voting?
http://www.bloombergview.com/article...flawed-primaryImagine if states prohibited some citizens from voting based on their political beliefs. The reaction, justifiably, would be outrage. Yet about a dozen states already do exactly that, with hardly a word of protest.
Much of the current national debate over voting rights has centered on overly stringent voter identification laws. But the single largest impediment to voter participation is a system that barely arouses notice: closed primaries that exclude anyone who declines to join a political party.
In the most recent presidential primary election, New York's on Tuesday, about 1 in 4 voters were prohibited from casting ballots because they do not belong to either major political party. On April 26, the same fate will befall independent voters in Connecticut, Delaware, Maryland and Pennsylvania.
Democrats and Republicans alike have tended to defend or discount the wholesale disenfranchisement of independent voters in closed primaries, arguing that it’s their choice not to join a party. But membership in a party should not be a prerequisite for equal access to the polls when the election is paid for by the public and administered by the state.
Actually, the Bernie or Trump paradox/ phenomenon has been do ented for months now. Why? Both are against the devastating and re edly destructive free trade agreements as well as tax loopholes, both are for campaign finance reform (which equally affects both parties), both are against perpetual warfare. And on a sidenote, neither candidate has a super PAC and or has been clearly and obviously bought this election like literally every other candidate, especially Shillary.
These are the biggest issues facing the country, everything else is way way way less important.
Of course, if youre one of those party liner people who actually believe Hillary isnt a moderate republican whos liberal on some social issues as of yestrday, you might find the thought of voting Trump repulsive. Dont really care though since Im an independent
Absolutely. Bernie would be winning the nomination in a landslide if independents could turn out and vote for someone affiliated with either party. One person one vote.
You're giving Trump way too much credit using his name in the same sentence with Sanders'. You haven't heard him constantly talk about bombing ISIS? How is he not a war hawk? Or how about how butthurt he was about Apple and how they should have to comply with the court order? His tax plan is a huge gift to the rich again just like Bush's.
Bernie's going to bomb ISIS too, let's be honest about it. that's world politics, and there's no way anyone will be elected and supported as president unless they do so. Bernie and Trump will most likely keep us out of all the other bull though, unlike Hillary and Cruz.
Like I said earlier though, voting for Trump feels nasty, just not as nasty as voting for Shillary. No super PAC, for sure against TPP and the other trade agreements. That's what brought me into the Bernie camp into the first place. Trump nor Hillary's message even compares to Bernie's, he's literally 10x the candidate she or he is, and everyone who voted for Hillary in the primaries/caucuses, especially registered democrats, should be ing ashamed.
I'll vote for Clinton in the general since I don't want to give the teabagger house a president who is going to sign all their re ed , which Cruz will do since he aligns almost exactly with them and which Trump will do under pressure from his party and since he aligns a lot with them on taxes. I really don't like Clinton or her piece of husband, but short of adopting a new cons ution the two party system is here to stay and you gotta pick the less bad option.
Trump and Sanders might both bomb ISIS, but Trump might also bomb China, Russia, Mexico, both Koreas just to be safe, and Austin. He appeals to the absolute worst things about people in this country.
And I don't believe he's nearly as big a lunatic as he lets on, but my biggest problem with him is that he validates and empowers lunatics.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote