Depends what you define as credible. If you just read MSM than no you won't find any agreeing with me. Many in the MSM are guilty as well as they were paid by Fusion GPS to peddle salacious lies. Instead of reporting honestly on what is being uncovered they try to distort or bury.
How The Media Buried Two Huge FBI Stories Yesterday
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/...ies-yesterday/
I like how The Federalist, a media outlet, is claiming media buried stories.
No, a far right wing website isn't credible
Muh Federalist is all over the Rob Porter story.
lol
What's an appropriate news source for Pavlov?
Not Lee Stranahan.
lol
You didn't answer the question Pavlov.
What's an appropriate news source for Pavlov?
GOP Rep: Benghazi, Fast and Furious Connected to Obama FBI & DOJ Exposed In FISA Memo (AUDIO)
In an explosive interview with Breitbart Radio Wednesday, firebrand conservative Congressman Paul Gosar (R-AZ) said Justice Department and FBI corruption, outlined in the FISA abuse memo, is connected to Obama-era scandals, such as Benghazi and Fast and Furious.
Partial transcript via Breitbart News:
“If you don’t think the [Operation] Fast and Furious—attacking the Second Amendment—along with Operation Choke Point, you know that sacred amendment that holds our government accountable and protection for all the other amendments, if you don’t think Benghazi and the lack of accountability when they knew something was going to come, if you don’t think that the IRS and the attacking of your adversaries financially, and the unmasking are unrelated things, think again,” Rep. Gosar told Breitbart News.
“You know, this previous administration—the Obama administration—micromanaged everything out of the White House. And I challenge people, remember the Syrian strikes that were actually handpicked and dictated by the president at that time. This gentleman was involved in everything. That’s where all this leads. When you look at the cover-up with the email scandal with Hillary Clinton, it gets—it should have pointed out exactly what we’ve been talking about, that this was the weaponization of our Justice Department not only to cover up for the previous administration and the wrongdoing and ills of them and those associated with them, but also to attack a sitting president—actually a candidate at the time, then president-elect and then a current, sitting president you know of an opposition party.”
If you thought the FISA abuse memo would be the sole report on FBI and Justice Department corruption, House Intelligence chairman Devin Nunes may have a surprise.
According to Axios, the Committee could publish up to five more reports outlining “politically motivated “wrongdoing” across various agencies, including the FBI, the broader Justice Department, and the State Department.”
The Washington Examiner’s Byron York concluded his recent article summarizing the memo’s key FISA abuses by warning a new showdown between Republicans and Democrats could resurface when additional information is released.
Translation: the FISA memo could be the first of many memos exposing corruption at both the FBI and Justice Department.
York writes:
Finally, the memo released today does not represent the sum total of what House investigators have learned in their review of the FBI and Justice Department Trump-Russia investigation. That means the fight over the memo could be replayed in the future when the Intelligence Committee decides to release more information.
It is not clear what information congressional investigators will release.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/02/gop-rep-benghazi-fast-furious-connected-obama-fbi-doj-exposed-fisa-memo-audio/
explosive!
Golly an explosive interview with Republican on breitbart.
What's not credible about that
There are many. Straight news is totally easy to find from sources that are labeled right or left. NYT, WaPo, WSJ, local papers, NPR, talk radio news breaks, actual news reports on cable channels. The point is to not just take one Lee Stranahan video and breathlessly post it as news.
Actually the Federalist claimed major outlets didn’t report on the stories and then backed up their claim. You’d have known that had you actually read the article instead of dismissing because muh far right.
What would you consider credible Blake?
Those are left leaning besides WSJ. I imagine there are a few you are ashamed to mention like MSNBC etc..You've been pushing Russian collusion for over a year...You have no right to lecture or mock anyone on where they get their news.
BREAKING: Another Longtime Aide To James Comey OUT at FBI
Michael Kortan, the FBI’s Head of Public Affairs and longtime aide to former bureau chief James Comey, is leaving his post.
That damn OIG investigation has em all running scared
Rats from a sinking ship
wonder what all the retiring republican congressman are running scared from...
Is it possible that Laufman signed an emergency surveillance order?
Already mentioned.I can mock you for posting a video from an American working for the Russian government.You've been pushing Russian collusion for over a year...You have no right to lecture or mock anyone on where they get their news.
I claim muh Federalist buried the Rob Porter story.
http://thefederalist.com/2018/02/08/...use-resurface/
What’s your definition of burying a story?
Forgot about Rybicki
Not covering it at all probably counts. Just did a cursory look over the past couple days. Must have just posted that after being scooped. Apologies if I overlooked.
It's not like the difference between ordering a report and ordering an investigation.
the subsequent application would still have to go back and explain the need for the emergency surveillance. that certainly would have come up in the memo, considering Gowdy read the full fisa warrant application
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
