Lol it was my article. Please let go of my ankle k thx
He'll pretend he doesn't care, but will incessantly ankle bite. Dude can't even Google arguments in his favor properly.
Lol it was my article. Please let go of my ankle k thx
Do you understand what you did here? Did you understand what's going on in the article I linked or did you just read the headline I pasted?
Lol cc
Damn you are stupid. I even posted the supreme court case for you and highlighted the applicable part. I even highlighted the part in YOUR post that said the same thing. You can't shut down churches without shutting down EVERYTHING that poses a similar risk.
I know. What do you think the article I posted is about, genius?
Do you not get how you backpedaled or are you going to stick with being disingenuous on top of re ed?
More ankle biting. Per par.
The guy is a ing idiot with zero reading comprehension.
I give up. He is too ing dumb to realize what an ass he is making of himself.
You're free to ask questions about what I'm talking about but I guess my ankle is really that tasty huh
You didn't even read the article, did you.![]()
You just thought you saw an easy opportunity for an internet win
Yes. I actually read it and understood it, unlike you. They can only legally shut down churches if the shut down everything else of equivalent "danger" which includes Walmart, HEB, etc. That's not happening. If a governor tries to shut down churches based on "danger" without shutting down EVERYTHING of equivalent danger then it is a clear attack on religion and violates the first amendment.
This is the last time I will try to explain it to your dumb ass.
Last edited by CosmicCowboy; 07-23-2020 at 04:18 PM.
No you didn't.
you ended up posting info that validated why I'm pissed off at Paxton
it's always and easy opportunity for an internet win arguing with you. Like taking candy from a baby.
I mean, you just on yourself here.
He's old hat and a worn punching bag. Poor bas .
And ing painfully stupid!
They can absolutely tell churches one entrance/exit, face coverings, social distancing etc. as long as everyone of equivalent danger has to do the same.
But you can force distancing requirements and capacity requirements. Start threatening preachers bottom lines.. they will fight back against that.
That is all I see happening here. I do not think for a second that any of the anti-shutdown preachers are doing so out of concern for anything other than how full the collection plate is at the end of the brainwashing session.... er sermon.
Sorry. You can shut down a church even with the first amendment, if that church actively threatens the health and safety of others.
If a tenet of a church was the sexual abuse of children, would the first amendment protect that? Simple yes or no.
(sits back and sips wine, awaiting the inevitable evasion/deflection)
Better. Can't shut down arbitrarily churches and not stores. Hooray nuance.
So the government can shut down schools, but can't shut down...schools....
Or private religious schools but not pubic schools.
But what's happening is that Paxton is saying that even though a city/county may declare it too dangerous to open school buildings and shut them down, they won't be able to shut down private religious schools.
It's too dangerous for Republicans to have an in-person convention, but safe enough to send everybody's kids back to school in a few weeks.
Surely DeSantis can set them up in a panhandle primary school cafetorium.
I totally agree with you on that.
Just give up loser. You made an ass of yourself.
The petulant child had the convention moved out of Charlotte NC because the NC Governor wouldn't commit to no social distancing requirement.![]()
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)