Reply With Quote
Why are they going after a felon? Unfair!
Run-up to the 2016 Election's Tranny
Cambridge Analytica had copies of Clinton emails one month before Wikileaks released them
Ok, so what could be worse than at least three Trump advisors — George Papadopoulos, Carter Page and Don Jr. — all being told that Russia had illegally obtained information about Hillary Clinton before that information was released by Wikileaks and Guccifer 2.0
but not any of them bothering to inform the FBI about this felony?
Or the fact that Jeff Sessions — who testified he didn’t know “any Trump surrogates who were in contact with the Russians” — had ordered Papadopoulos to “find out everything he could” about the emails the Russians stole?
Perhaps the fact that multiple Russians and their associates attempted to set up an (illegal) personal meeting between Trump and Putin before the election through various members of the campaign staff including Papadopoulos
(yes, him again via Sergei Millian after he was personally authorized to reach out to the Russians by Trump),
Don Jr. (via Alexander Torshin),
Rhona Graff and
Steve Bannon (via Rob Goldstone and Emin Agalarov),
Michael Cohen and
Ivanka Trump (via Russian Olympic Weight-lifter Dmitry Kolkov)?
Nope. That’s not bad enough.
It seems that Trump voter targeting and data operation,
which also happened to steal the personal data of 87 Million Americans in order to discover how to effectively suppress the [Black] vote in order to help Trump win —
also happened to have had copies of Hillary’s stolen emails for a month before they were first released by Wikileaks.
Then there’s Cambridge Analytica.
The (now shuttered) British company did the Trump campaign’s data.
Its speciality was ‘microtargeting’: individual messages tailored to individual voters, delivered by email, Facebook and Twitter.
The US intelligence agencies believe that Russian internet ‘troll factories’ were also pushing out pro-Trump propaganda on social media:
sometimes fake news,
sometimes real news,
such as the hacked contents of Clinton’s emails.
The question is whether this was done in coordination with the Trump campaign.
An American lawyer I know told me that he was approached by a Cambridge Analytica employee after the election.
They had had the Clinton emails more than a month before they were published by WikiLeaks:
‘What should I do?’
Take this to Mueller, the lawyer replied.
That particular story happens to point out that the British government hasn’t been cooperating with the Mueller investigation
in order to appease Trump on trade relations, although in the end, it doesn’t seem to be working.https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/6/21/1774270/-Cambridge-Analytica-had-copies-of-Clinton-emails-one-month-before-Wikileaks-released-them?detail=emaildkre
So how might Britain be sucking up to Trump?
A Labour MP, Ben Bradshaw, thinks that the government has not always done all it can to assist the Mueller inquiry into whether Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia.
Bradshaw was the minister in charge of the Secret Intelligence Service, known as MI6, and has doggedly pursued allegations about Russian meddling in other people’s elections.
‘I’m told that Mueller’s team were over here late last year and they weren’t happy with the level of cooperation they were getting,
Oh look, derp lusting and fake quoting.
You still crusty about the FBI investigating your felon?
That's exactly what you've done with all the outlets that don't preach your worldview.
What felonies?
Meltdown incoming.
Why you to much of a pussy to start that thread?
You're too much of a pussy to ever list even one crime after incessantly bringing them up in multiple threads.
lol derp
How many threads do you have to cry about this in before you'll start a thread on it?
lol pussy conditions
You love talking about Hillary's crimes until someone asks you about them. Then you curl up into a ball and sob uncontrollably.
Pussy actions.
Start a thread if this matters to you instead of regularly sabotaging threads
This is literally a thread about the FBI's investigating Hillary Clinton for potential crimes, derp.
It's literally about a closed investigation. If you want to specifically regard Hillary's crimes, then start a thread on it. You're scared that if you do that, you'll have to take a stance.
So much drivel coming from you, derp.
Nothing is keeping you from posting about your claim on this thread. (The most appropiate thread for you to do so in fact)
Why are you calling me out instead of the guy who won't start a thread on it?
Aw, that's cute; tranny slobbing chump's nob.
Why are you calling me out instead of the guy who won't start a thread on it?
Aw, that's cute; tranny slobbing chump's nob.you're terrified.
You melt down every single time I ask.
What is this about your 100th thread you've derailed? This is on you for not starting a thread. You want your distractions. This says everything about you, not me.
You melt down every single time I ask.
Derailed?
This thread is literally about Hillary's alleged criminal behavior.
List what you think are her crimes.
So, what crimes do you think Hillary committed, then?
You don't think she committed any.
OK. Thanks.
You failed to support your claim. Par.
She looks a lot like George Liquor
What crimes do you say she committed, or are you sperm shielding again?
You made the claim.
List the crimes you claim she committed.
Step up or back down again.
Some would say that deleting 30,000 emails and hiring a professional to bleach her hard drive after receiving a subpoena for the emails would qualify as obstruction of justice.
She was extremely careless. Can't be charged for carelessness. Gross negligence OTOH.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
