Reply With Quote
Mike Glennon
There would be no point considering you are one dull ass character.
gnsf
Cats
newton
Iman shumpert
Cats
100% got thinks I read his posts
my is funny
Dion waiters
Gets on every thread
Acting tough after all those takes and being exposed as a cat lover
Taking care of his girls cats
Beta
Cuck
100% got thinks I read his posts
my is funny
Only pussy he gets is his cats
Shumpert was a historically bad take, tbh
Ya, but that was when Diaw was Diaw 1.0 & when Green was a playoff choker. I'll take my hit for that thread, but it wasn't that far off in the beginning.
your Cam knob slobbing in the NFL forum has also become a joke... plus you just try to be hardass for no reason
Yea, but Diaw was still Diaw 1.0, and you can't forget Green's horrendous 1-12 shooting in the games that mattered most, as well as his horrific choke in 2012 against OKC. He didn't just shoot cold, he shot ice cold.
Shumpert was a good defensive prospect, and remember this was before we found out Green was a pretty good defender. Green was considered one of the biggest system players.. he couldn't even dribble.
But the tides turned and I'll take my shots.
How long before Henrik and Daniel Sedin show up to tell No Lyf3 that he's dropping truf nukes?
Cam is a good QB, and I think he has proved that. Definitely a franchise QB.your Cam knob slobbing in the NFL forum has also become a joke... plus you just try to be hardass for no reason
As for S&B, because he's a got. Never talked to him, and he followed the garbage band wagon. es be put in place, son.
Probably as soon as you make a joke that generates laughter.
i dont know what you're talking about. my brother and i are steelers fans
Are you S&B?
Or are you both Spurs fan coincidentally? Quoting each other, and agreeing, and ..
sedins have like 60 posts each and half of them are humping your leg
Post one example. Just one.
Best Shooting Team Hypothetical
PG: Stephen Curry
SG: Kobe Bryant
SF: Larry Bird
PF: Kevin Love
C: Dirk Nowitzki
I think this is hypothetically the best 3 pt. shooting team using the 5 traditional positions
In the Kobe vs. Duncan debate, how about the argument that Kobe didn't have to "sacrifice" or give up any part of his financial livelihood in order to get his 5 rings? Sure it seems respectable that Duncan has been taking less money than he could have for years in order to build and maintain compe ive rosters, but in the game of "what ifs", Kobe could have done the same thing and could've arguably won 2-3 more championships. It's almost a testament to Kobe's greatness that he has won 5 in light of the fact that he's had to do it with arguably less talented rosters (or at least less higher paid players) overall than Duncan did.
Like Lakers never had 100 mil $ roster
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions