Spurs fielding trade calls for Parker

**MaNu4Tres** · 06-23-2011

WojYahooNBA
Partial of deal: The Bucks get Stephen Jackson, Shaun Livingston, sources say. Charlotte gets the 7th pick and Corey Maggette.

**baseline bum** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by Mal

me, Parker for Jennings + pick + fillers.

Que?

**timvp** · 06-23-2011

Parker defends point guards about 23423 times better than Hill does.

**DarkGinobili** · 06-23-2011

This thread is going to be huge. lol

**Mugen** · 06-23-2011

I'd love for the spurs to trade Hill for a pick that becomes Singleton or Honeycutt.

backup pg is a need for this team regardless if Hill stays or is traded.

i wouldnt mind a trade with PHX:

RJ
Hill

for

Childress
13th
future pick/throw in

**DPG21920** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by Bruno

Well, it's been rumored on twitter by a radio guy an hour ago...

I know. There's a lot of rumors out there and I was picking the one I saw as the most realistic.

**Ditty** · 06-23-2011

George Hill is a better defender than Parker, but I would take Parker's defense IQ over George's anyday, how to defende a simple pick n roll..Please Spurs trade George Hill, and get Chris Singleton, or Tobias Harris.

**baseline bum** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by ace3g

WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Partial of deal: The Bucks get Stephen Jackson, Shaun Livingston, sources say. Charlotte gets the 7th pick and Corey Maggette.

damn I wanted SJ

I wanted Jack all the way until this year, but I'd much rather have talented youth now. Trading Parker for a lesser vet would be horrible.

**joshdaboss** · 06-23-2011

The deal we need to make is with Toronto. If we can get Calderon back, there won't be as much slippage at PG as one might think. It actually may be better for the team. He's a pass-first PG, which is what a PG is supposed to be. Obviously the pick is an added bonus and if we could somehow get Bargnani back, wow......... we stacked.

**timvp** · 06-23-2011

Bobcats in ultra tank mode.

**objective** · 06-23-2011

I'm so pissed off that Jackson is now unobtainable. If there was ever a chance to move Jefferson it was for him. But Charlotte preferred Maggette and his stupid contract + 7 over Jefferson's worse play + Hill which I guess would be the Spurs best offer, and I can't blame them.

**nkdlunch** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by baseline bum

What does anyone see in Hill's defense besides his long arms? It's hilarious (in a sad way) watching guys like Nash and Ray Allen mercilessly run this guy through screens for wide open shots all day.

Hill is bad at chasing ppl through screen. Parker is no better.

Hill is a better defender when the opponent has the ball.

overall Hill - mediocre defender. Parker - poor defender.

**Cane** · 06-23-2011

Hill is a much better overall defender than Parker and who doesn't get burned by Nash and Ray Allen? They make young guys in their prime look out of shape and have skills that won't leave til they retire if ever.

**ace3g** · 06-23-2011

WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Milwaukee's 10th overall pick goes to the Kings, source says.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
Hearing Bobcats-Bucks-Kings deal includes Bucks get Beno Udrih and the No. 9 and 19 picks Bobcats.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
The Bobcats get No. 7 pick from Sac. & Maggette. Kings will get John Salmons and the No. 10 pick.

**baseline bum** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by joshdaboss

The deal we need to make is with Toronto. If we can get Calderon back, there won't be as much slippage at PG as one might think. It actually may be better for the team. He's a pass-first PG, which is what a PG is supposed to be. Obviously the pick is an added bonus and if we could somehow get Bargnani back, wow......... we stacked.

You're just full of horrible ideas. Bargnani is like a rich mans Bonner. If they trade with Toronto I'd much rather get a rebounder with some size like Ed Davis. With Johnson and Bargnani already there he could probably be had too.

**timvp** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by objective

I'm so pissed off that Jackson is now unobtainable. If there was ever a chance to move Jefferson it was for him. But Charlotte preferred Maggette and his stupid contract + 7 over Jefferson's worse play + Hill which I guess would be the Spurs best offer, and I can't blame them.

Why care about getting Jackson if the era is already over? If you think the Spurs have no shot at another run, Buckets is the last player you should want on this team.

**joshdaboss** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by nkdlunch

Hill is bad at chasing ppl through screen. Parker is no better.

Hill is a better defender when the opponent has the ball.

overall Hill - mediocre defender. Parker - poor defender.

I would agree mostly. I think Hill is a good defender, but the key is that he has potential to get much better, whereas Parker is only going to decline even more.

**DPG21920** · 06-23-2011

What does Sac get for their pick

**crc21209** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by ace3g

WojYahooNBA Adrian Wojnarowski
Milwaukee's 10th overall pick goes to the Kings, source says.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
Hearing Bobcats-Bucks-Kings deal includes Bucks get Beno Udrih and the No. 9 and 19 picks Bobcats.

chadfordinsider Chad Ford
The Bobcats get No. 7 pick from Sac. & Maggette. Kings will get John Salmons and the No. 10 pick.

So Salmons goes back to the Kings?

**baseline bum** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by Phila_Chamberlain

According to this site Hill isn't a point guard. Against the league's best shooting guard the first two times they played Hill was a big part of holding Kobe to 13 of 45 shooting from the field. I'd like to see Parker try that.

Hill can defend one and only one type of player: a selfish guard who wants nothing but isolations. He's phenomenal in that role. Every other type of player he's lousy guarding.

**loveforthegame** · 06-23-2011

As a Kings fan as well I don't get this trade for them. They couldn't wait to get rid of Salmons before and they're now taking him back? Desperate to get rid of Udrih maybe? He was actually one of the few bright spots last year.

**joshdaboss** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by baseline bum

You're just full of horrible ideas. Bargnani is like a rich mans Bonner. If they trade with Toronto I'd much rather get a rebounder with some size like Ed Davis. With Johnson and Bargnani already there he could probably be had too.

Bargnani is 7' tall. He blocks shots. He stretches it to the 3 as a 7' PF/C. He can put it on the floor. Ed Davis doesn't have the basketball IQ to play for a team like the Spurs.

**joshdaboss** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by baseline bum

Hill can defend one and only one type of player: a selfish guard who wants nothing but isolations. He's phenomenal in that role. Every other type of player he's lousy guarding.

Parker is pretty good at guarding Luke Ridnour. Just kidding, Ridnour torches him. lol @ Parker's defense.

**baseline bum** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by joshdaboss

Bargnani is 7' tall. He blocks shots. He stretches it to the 3 as a 7' PF/C. He can put it on the floor. Ed Davis doesn't have the basketball IQ to play for a team like the Spurs.

Bargnani doesn't have the nutsack to play for the Spurs.

**objective** · 06-23-2011

Originally Posted by timvp

Why care about getting Jackson if the era is already over? If you think the Spurs have no shot at another run, Buckets is the last player you should want on this team.

Pretty simple answer: I want to be able to enjoy watching the Spurs as much as possible, entertainment-wise.

Jefferson sucks the life out of that when he's on the court. So does Bonner.

Even regular season games, watching them just plain sucks.

I would enjoy watching Jackson trot around like old days with the big three, even though he'd be limping and shooting like .167 or some other awful number.

Seeing Jefferson on the court SUCKS.

Thread Tools

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions