Flynn in major trouble for speaking to Russia about sanctions

[pgardn]

Line up behind pgarden in the long line of ST assholes with hilariously wrong takes.

This,

is reassuring.

Coming from the worst poster in this forum.
All is well. The Earth has not been knocked off its axis.

[boutons_deux]

Coming from the worst poster in this forum

"There He Goes Again"

[djohn2oo8]

lol

[Blake]

You have me yelling answer my question first!

I would not do that IRL because my question was clearly answered and they do think pizza is tasty.

Maybe next time Blake. Time to move on.

Lol the round and round on a simple example

My question wasn't answered.

Your questions are clearly answered on many an occasion where you still demand it be answered.

There's some kind of disconnect somewhere with your communication skills. You have dyslexia or something?

[djohn2oo8]

lol

[DarrinS]

By career-long habits, does he mean laws?

[Adam Lambert]

the president needs a babysitter to keep him from reacting to fake news

the president

[boutons_deux]

Kelly didnt scare the leaker into not leaking Trash-Nieto telecon transcript to WaPo

[Adam Lambert]

losing his friends

[ducks]

bad health care will end lives in usa

[RandomGuy]

I've told you what I think is going on and have done so multiple times. I don't keep responding to the same question when you ask it day after day.

If your theory were concrete, testable, and straightforward, it would be a simple matter to outline it, including how it could be falsified.

I have done exactly this. I do not want to believe in anything false, so I make sure what I believe can be tested. If it can't be tested, I do not hold it as true, and if it is actively falsified, I abandon the proposition. If you cared about the truth, you should be able to do the same.

Search functions on this board do not lend themselves easily to find such information, even were one to want to see what your actual opinion is.

You could, quite easily, have re-typed that theory in the time/effort you have spent typing posts that say "I have already posted that, so I am not answering it".

This suggests the hypothesis:

You have no concrete, testable, straightforward theory.

Continued failure to state a clear, coherent is fully consistant with this hypothesis. It can easily be falsified by you typing up a clear, concrete, testable theory. All you really have to do is type something up in a few minutes, then copy and paste that if someone asks in the future. Easy.

I would recommend including an unusual word, such as xylophone, or something similar, to help with any future search in case you want to find it again.

[ducks]

Kelly didnt scare the leaker into not leaking Trash-Nieto telecon transcript to WaPo

who knows when this was leaked

[RandomGuy]

From the OP bet

"friendly avatar bet. Winner chooses losers avatar, you determine the length of the terms."

I am not really interested in that as a bet.

I would vastly prefer that you apply the principles of critical thinking to an op-ed piece, or something you post, correctly identifying any potential logical fallacies. I am interested much less in embarrassing you, than in your well being and self-improvement. FWIW.

[RandomGuy]

dude this is usually how it goes:

Tsa: I think pizza is tasty. Pepperoni is shown to have health benefits.
Someone else: what kind of benefits?
Tsa: why don't you think pizza is tasty?
SE: I do but what about the pepperoni benefits?
Tsa: answer my question first!


Failed attempt. Question was answered. Move on Blake maybe next time you'll get it right.

???

Wow.

Did you really read what you typed there?

You showed yourself committing a logical fallacy (strawman), and evading a simple request for information.

You do understand that, right?

[Pavlov]

losing his friends

[boutons_deux]

Sons admit $100Ms have flowed into Trash's (bankrupt) businesses

Kushner requested an extra-governmental ENCRYPTED channel from WH to Pootin

Why have Trash and so many of his entourage been in repeated, long contact with Russians, before, during, after the campaign?

Trash
Manafort
Sessions
DJT Jr
Levandoski
Gorka
Flynn
Tillerson
Ross
Kushner
and probably unknown others

Why have they criminally "forgotten" or refused to do ent their Russian contacts on Federal forms, forgotten what the meeting involved, or even "forgotten" the meetings?

Why have they been caught LYING about their Russian contacts?

If their contacts with Russians were innocent, why then their behaviors that SCREAM COVERUP?

If innocent, why haven't they come clean, proven their innocence?

Behind Trump’s Russia Romance, There’s a Tower Full of Oligarchs

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...l-of-oligarchs

Where are the contacts, meetings of Trash + entourage with top officials from countries OTHER THAN RUSSIA?

C O V E R U P

[djohn2oo8]

[boutons_deux]

why acting head?

Wray has been confirmed as FBI director

[TSA]

.

I started on page 315 and have since been scanning and skipping this hole of an argument he's in with Pavlov. I think watching paint dry is more interesting. TSA needs an injection of funny.

If you thought watching paint dry was more interesting you would have been reading since page 315.

[TSA]

still don't get how a bulletin board works.

still hasn't had anyone respond to the OP
talking to yourself

[TSA]

Lol the round and round on a simple example

My question wasn't answered.

Your questions are clearly answered on many an occasion where you still demand it be answered.

There's some kind of disconnect somewhere with your communication skills. You have dyslexia or something?

Time to move on Blake, you've even got RandomGuy confused.

[TSA]

???

Wow.

Did you really read what you typed there?

You showed yourself committing a logical fallacy (strawman), and evading a simple request for information.

You do understand that, right?

I didn't type any of that lol

[TSA]

"friendly avatar bet. Winner chooses losers avatar, you determine the length of the terms."

I am not really interested in that as a bet.

I would vastly prefer that you apply the principles of critical thinking to an op-ed piece, or something you post, correctly identifying any potential logical fallacies. I am interested much less in embarrassing you, than in your well being and self-improvement. FWIW.

I'm much more interested in embarrassing you. Take or leave the original bet.

[Blake]

Time to move on Blake, you've even got RandomGuy confused.

Right. ..it's RG that's confused.

[djohn2oo8]