Reply With Quote
That's what I was thinking. He used to always pull the "team of destiny" . And boy was he wrong about last year!OK, I wasn't sure who you were before but now I'm pretty sure.
TimmyToZo coming back from death to bandwagon a whole new team.
That "young" fallacy is severely overplayed. The Pelicans aren't that young. Teams that suck ass always have the "young" excuse because they are moving guys in and out of the roster constantly, and they get high draft picks, then they act like they'll be contenders in a few years. You were using the same "young" excuse when CP3 was there.Struggling to beat a young 8th seed for 3 games in a row
That's what I was thinking. He used to always pull the "team of destiny" . And boy was he wrong about last year!OK, I wasn't sure who you were before but now I'm pretty sure.
TimmyToZo coming back from death to bandwagon a whole new team.
Warriors have so many players to hate.
What if we bet on both sides?
Never used the young excuse during the CP3 days. They had a veteran team around CP3. This Pelicans squad is the 3rd youngest in the league. They're a young team with limited playoff experience.
Daunte wasn't a got like this clown.OK, I wasn't sure who you were before but now I'm pretty sure.
TimmyToZo coming back from death to bandwagon a whole new team.
Whoa! THAT was supposed to be a W for NO. Just missed FT in crucial minutes..
Davis impressive 29 pts 15 rbds 3 assets.... But hid team is now in a deep 3-0 hole
Pelicans Playoff Experience: Pondexter, Holiday, Cole, Asik, Douglas, Anderson, Cunningham. Sounds more encouraging than it is.
When a team like SA loses, it's because they are old. When a team like the Pelican's lose, it's because they are young. Spurs are the oldest team in the NBA and the Pels are tied for 4th youngest. It's not like these players hatched in New Orleans. Most were acquired. That means the team goes out and seeks young, cheap players and they get a coach who's historically a ing loser. That team has no interest in winning anything. They want to do the player market day trading to upsize their roster while another team pays for the salary through waivers.
Also, Curry didn't step out of bounds. Well unless you think that his foot size is a 20
He did on his first attempt, not the one he made.Also, Curry didn't step out of bounds. Well unless you think that his foot size is a 20
Ah really, my bad then. That one I have no angle for.
They still issuing free condoms or does she have to pay for them?
Steph practicing his late-game miracle: https://instagram.com/p/101V-Xt58s/
Chill out bro
Come on man, that's classless..
Pls shut the up.
"scooped up my girl from work"
"wrapped up"
It was ripe for the picking.
Do you look up the facts before you post stuff like this? None of their young players are cheap. But I guess it felt good when you typed this.
I didn't notice him go out of bounds but after he made his move on that first attempt, he definitely shot with his foot on the 3 point line. would have been really interesting if he had made it because as I understand it that's a reviewable play even after playing on. Come back from commercial thinking OT, and seeing the refs say just kidding, game's over.
He didn't step out of bounds, but the league says today that at 14.0, Curry travelled and it should have been called.
http://official.nba.com/wp-content/u...15-GSW-NOP.pdf
Not a good review for the crew of last night's game. In the last 2 minutes of regulation and in OT, the league's report says they missed 5 calls -- an offensive foul on Draymond at (32.0 in the 4th), the Curry travel (at 14.0 in the 4th), the Davis foul on Curry's made 3 (at 3.5 in the 4th), an offensive foul on Bogut (at 2:29 of OT), and the bizarre off-the-ball call (at 10.9 in OT). Of those, the most damning is probably the miss on the Curry made 3, but had they called the travel that apparently should have been called, it likely wouldn't have ever come to that.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
