Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 123
  1. #76
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    DPG is simply new at this.
    You are acting like I am posting things that are completely implausible. My scenario could easily come into play just as yours. My whole issue was KT being a UFA. I said we are not in a real threat for the luxury tax, but it has to be watched in case KT gets a bigger than expected offer. Don't be a Manny

  2. #77
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Exactly. The roster is deep enough as it is with player who will expect minutes. There's no room to keep adding non-minimum players to the roster. Thomas, Finley (or Finley replacement) and minimum contracts.

    Offseason over.
    I am fine and comfortable with this, I understand. But in this scenario it assumes we have KT. My thoughts are what if KT is gone, we will only have 2 Exceptions to use in order to fill the gap.

  3. #78
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    57,943
    If KT is gone then they sure as aren't in LT territory. If KT is gone its bad, but if Duncan breaks his leg its bad too. No point in worrying about the unlikely.

  4. #79
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    Well I am a worrier, that is why I am up so late...was not worried about any other thing (the draft, FA signings that were not ours), the only thing was KT. I wonder if the Nets would be willing to trade some of their bigs. I would absolutely love to get Josh Boone.

  5. #80
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    I wonder if he could be had, we could use the trade exception on him, but I doubt they would take that...

  6. #81
    Spur Forever urunobili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    14,291
    LLE 4 Diaw ara

  7. #82
    GIVE IT TO GINOBILI beirmeistr's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    2,568
    If Najera were to sign for less money to come to San Antonio, he could probably make up the difference with endorsements due to his popularity with Mexican Americans along the border.

  8. #83
    Veteran exstatic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    45,483
    But if we could sign three reserves (presumably our two other rookies plus another one) and give them the minimum of less than an M, would that give us sufficient amount to match a 6 - 7M offer to KT?
    Who the F is going to offer Kurt Thomas that money? You'd have to have cap room to do that. You really need to start thinking in realistic terms. The MLE is ~ $5.8M. Start there and work downwards.

  9. #84
    Truth, justice, and the NBA
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Post Count
    4,752
    Najera went to HS in SA? Is that right? I hadn't heard that. Where did he go?

  10. #85
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    100
    Sounds like Najera is using the Spurs' interest simply to get a better deal out of the Nets.
    YEP

  11. #86
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    Najera went to HS in SA? Is that right? I hadn't heard that. Where did he go?
    He played a year at Cornerstone Christian Academy.

  12. #87
    Can't Start Threads
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,417
    najara can hustle....but he is the last player on our roster we need...if najara were just 3 or 4 inchs taller, teams would be all over this guy.....if fab had less brain and played like najara id like fab...in a fight, id take najara over fab in a knockout..but this is the nba not the ufc...so until now, we are stuck, with a smart (excuse my french (girlyman) and a short old 6'9 starter, standing next to timmy......i still dont like our bigs, and najara isnt big.....najara can keep on trucking in my book.....waste of space

  13. #88
    Mr. Dignity Solid D's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    23,462
    The Spurs seem to be intent on having the "combination 4" as a part of their roster.

    James Gist looks to be a possible option there because he demonstrated in college that he can defend opposing 3s and 4s. Diawara is less likely to defend 4s well and Najera less likely to defend 3s well (less so, than earlier in his career).

  14. #89
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Post Count
    160
    najera, can hustle, this team is in desperate need of a hustle type player, plus najera has expanded his game alot in adding the three point shot, not sure about his midgame, but something the spurs need, not sure why some people are against this. People get all over Nocioni, i really dont think there is that big of a difference between the two, Noc is probably alittle bit more dynamic, but costs 50M to get, if Najera can be found on the cheap, thats a great thing. Hustle guys are hard to find.

  15. #90
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Najera could really help Spurs. I don't think Spurs have enough money left to sign him. If Spurs get him, Bonner will be in the doghouse or traded.

    Diawara isn't a very good or talented player but he is a hard worker. If Spurs sign him, it could means that they aren't sold on Udoka as Bruce Bowen "successor". In French newspaper, Dallas and SA are the two teams that are said to be interested in him.
    Acquring a player like Najera is a priority. Someone to defend, rebound and spread the floor. Yet KT's resigining is even more of a priority.

  16. #91
    99/03/05/07/14 Spurs Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Post Count
    27,510
    If we can get Najera on a 2 year deal it would be nice

  17. #92
    Veteran loveforthegame's Avatar
    My Team
    Golden State Warriors
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Post Count
    18,321
    Come on Najera. You'll have a better chance at a ring here than you would in NJ.

  18. #93
    Ghost of Mr. K SenorSpur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Post Count
    14,918
    Come on Najera. You'll have a better chance at a ring here than you would in NJ.
    I read that Najera's got a fierce loyalty to Nets GM, Kiki Vandeweghe, who was responsible for drafting him in the first place. However I'm sure he'd like to come home and play in front of the home folks.

    I just wish he'd make up his damn mind.

  19. #94
    Get Refuel! FromWayDowntown's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Post Count
    19,921
    I like the idea of Najera as an addition to this roster -- agree on the Malik Rose analogy (though Najera of today isn't nearly what Malik Rose was in 2002 or 2003) and think it gives the Spurs still another Bowen-type who can play while never backing down from anyone. I also think that whottt might be on to something with the notion that Najera is getting to that point where thinking ring might make sense. The Maggette comparison on that point is, as Manny and others have noted, inapt; but Najera has at least been close enough to big things in the past (2003) to think he might want a shot to get to the top of the mountain at least once. He would certainly give the Spurs another, nice tenacious presence on the bench -- he'd fit well, I think, with a group that would include notable redasses like Ginobili, Udoka, and perhaps KT.

    I'm also not sold that the Spurs are bent on avoiding the tax. They spent a good chunk of last season doing that, but they've also shown, in the past, a willingness to go over if it can be beneficial. They were marginally over the threshold in 2006-07, after all. Obviously, they'll skirt that line as closely as possible and try to stay on the good side of it, but if teams like the Knicks and Mavericks find ways to shed salary in the short term, it may be less disadvantageous to be on the wrong side of the line.

  20. #95
    Who wants a mustache ride oligarchy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    1,728
    I'm also not sold that the Spurs are bent on avoiding the tax. They spent a good chunk of last season doing that, but they've also shown, in the past, a willingness to go over if it can be beneficial. They were marginally over the threshold in 2006-07, after all. Obviously, they'll skirt that line as closely as possible and try to stay on the good side of it, but if teams like the Knicks and Mavericks find ways to shed salary in the short term, it may be less disadvantageous to be on the wrong side of the line.
    They did already receive a payout from the luxury tax pool that could be used to pay a limited amount over the line, where it wouldn't really cost them a dollar for dollar, if they are spending someone else's money.

  21. #96
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    1,971
    Unless we trade Bonner, I cant see Najera coming to SA..that said he's a HACK & I'd rather him not play for the Spurs.

  22. #97
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    14
    Net officials met with Hayes and Eduardo Najera yesterday in Orlando. Thorn called them “exploratory-type” meetings.

    “Everybody’s evaluating where they are,” he said.

    When asked if he thought either or both of them could be a Net by later today, Thorn said, “One of them” could and that “more than likely” it would be Hayes.

    “We’ll see,” Thorn said. “Both sides are evaluating.”

    Link: http://njmg.typepad.com/zzone/2008/0...on-horizo.html

    - Maybe the Nets are done trying to get Najera now that Hayes is on board.

  23. #98
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    give up Bonner and get Najera, that would be awesome

  24. #99
    Veteran stxspurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    1,495
    im sick of spurs only able to get scrub players in FA mkt.......bummer offseason......nobody wants to play in san antonio

  25. #100
    I'm your huckleberry K-State Spur's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,810
    Outside of those 3 or 4 days where it looked like we had a real shot at Maggette, I was hoping for a Mason + Najera offseason.

    Add those 2, and this team has a decent upgrade from last year, no matter what the chicken littles who accuse this team of regressing will say.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •