On J.F.K.

[doobs]

There is an eyewitness who saw the shooters behind the picket fence. He is a deaf-mute man, and brother of a policeman, who got to the overpass 45 minutes before the shootings. Since he is deaf-mute, he is very observent, and not distracted by sounds.

This witness alone would acquit Oswald. People are convicted or acquitted all the time in court based on one good eyewitness.

For a moment I thought you were joking.

[Galileo]

For a moment I thought you were joking.

I'm not joking. You can look it up. Oliver Stone interviewed the man for the bonus features when the JFK DVD came out about 10 years ago (he is not in the movie, but he is do ented in the new 2008 book 'JFK and the Unspeakable). I don't know if he is still alive today.

[DarrinS]

There is an eyewitness who saw the shooters behind the picket fence. He is a deaf-mute man, and brother of a policeman, who got to the overpass 45 minutes before the shootings. Since he is deaf-mute, he is very observent, and not distracted by sounds.

This witness alone would acquit Oswald. People are convicted or acquitted all the time in court based on one good eyewitness.

translation

blah blah blah, blah blah blah-blah-blah, blah blah-blah blah blah.

Blah blah blah-blah blah, blah blah blah, blah-blah blah-blah blah, blah.

[Yonivore]

I didn't hear anything in the video about the US House Select Committee on Assassinations; it does talk about Oswald being the lone gunman, that the mob had nothing to do with it, and the findings of the Warren Commission. In 2003 the chief council of the HSCA said, "Significantly, the Warren Commission's conclusion that the agencies of the government co-operated with it is, in retrospect, not the truth...We also now know that the Agency set up a process that could only have been designed to frustrate the ability of the committee in 1976-79 to obtain any information that might adversely affect the Agency."

Why did the CIA bring out of retirement George Joannides, the agent who had had contact with the same anti-Castro group as Oswald, and at the same time as Oswald, and put him in charge of "fascilitating" the research of the HSCA, and without telling anybody in the HSCA about Joannides's background? As Blakey said, Joannides should have been testifying, not working in the investigation. The HSCA's reserachers complained that Joannides was acting as a "filter", not a "fascilitator". What was he filtering? We'll never know, thanks to the CIA's obstructions. Did they go to all of this trouble just to make sure that nobody in the agency would look bad? Is it not natural to wonder just what the CIA was ultimately trying to hide?

Whatever the exact truth is, the CIA didn't look very interested in finding it. That agency has lied to the citizens of this country many times and it has engaged in terrible activities from the beginning. I don't know why anyone would trust anything that they are involved in, which very much includes these investigations into Oswald's activities before he assassinated JFK.

Is this the same CIA that couldn't keep rendition and secret prisons secret?

The same administration that can't keep NSA intelligence programs secret?

Yeah, I'm buying your theory.

[DarkReign]

Yeah, I'm buying your theory.

We're all very surprised, you regular skeptic, you.

"I like pancakes, but hate eggs.

Everyone who likes pancakes is my friend, whomever likes eggs is my enemy."

Yoni, in a nuts .

[Yonivore]

We're all very surprised, you regular skeptic, you.

"I like pancakes, but hate eggs.

Everyone who likes pancakes is my friend, whomever likes eggs is my enemy."

Yoni, in a nuts .

I use eggs in my pancakes. You?

[Nbadan]

What does Clear Channel have to do with the Discovery Channel again?

....most of their programme is fantasy land for one...

[Nbadan]

Is this the same CIA that couldn't keep rendition and secret prisons secret?

The same administration that can't keep NSA intelligence programs secret?

Yeah, I'm buying your theory.

On the other-hand we have been able to keep things like stealth technology and other things secret...

[Yonivore]

On the other-hand we have been able to keep things like stealth technology and other things secret...

Really? Never indefinitely.

[IceColdBrewski]

....most of their programme is fantasy land for one...

How bout the National Geographic channel then? They had a good special a couple of weeks ago where they used forensic science to show that each of the bullet wounds that JFK received were from a person shooting a rifle from the school book depository. They were able to reach the conclusion based on the direction of the entrance/exit wounds and blood splatters. If shots had come from the grassy knoll, JFK would have received different types of wounds, reacted differently to being shot, and would have actually had his head blown completely off.

[Nbadan]

How bout the National Geographic channel then? They had a good special a couple of weeks ago where they used forensic science to show that each of the bullet wounds that JFK received were from a person shooting a rifle from the school book depository. They were able to reach the conclusion based on the direction of the entrance/exit wounds and blood splatters. If shots had come from the grassy knoll, JFK would have received different types of wounds, reacted differently to being shot, and would have actually had his head blown completely off.

Did they interview the Doctors at Parkland hospital?

[Galileo]

Is this the same CIA that couldn't keep rendition and secret prisons secret?

The same administration that can't keep NSA intelligence programs secret?

Yeah, I'm buying your theory.

The same group that kept the evil Manhattan Project secret.