Reply With Quote
That['s right. Jump to conclusions. Sorry, I need real evidence.Rummy had to invent a new office to sign off on ty intel.
That's all anyone needs to know.
You're blatantly stupid.
There you go.
That['s right. Jump to conclusions. Sorry, I need real evidence.
That's all anyone needs to know.
Look, I'm sorry you have chosen to remain ignorant about the past eight years. There is plenty of information out there about the Office of Special Plans, etc., but you don't really want to know.
Just shut up and wave your miniature American flag.
You referring to me?
If so, My God. When will you ever get a clue?
I attack those who use baseless attacks. I'm sorry if that means I end up defending republicans from lib s. I don't see baseless attacks on the left from the right very often. I don't do it to defend republicans, but to defend the truth. If you think about it, I have actually defended democrats at times!
How many times must I say something to that effect before you get a clue?
At least I believe in waving a flag. I doubt you have any patriotic blood in your veins.
And you molest children.
Now that we've got that out of the way....
See...
You have nothing, so you revert to vile slander...
Pathetic...
Or is it a fantasy of yours? Afterall, those who think certain thoughts often want to displace those thoughts on others...
You did it first, idiot. Now you're whining about having the whip reversed on you.
Typical.
Have a tissue.
Name-calling and bad words are a far cry different than slander!
You're so stupid, you don't even know the meaning of the word.
That's the best part of all of this.
You're a pretentious fake, and you yourself over more than anyone else could.
Only in your world. Other people know the difference.
I'm done with you for a day or so. You're starting to bore me. Nothing of substance. Just baseless attacks.
Yes, people other than you know the difference between slander and other forms of defamation.
You don't know the meaning of slander.I'm done with you for a day or so. You're starting to bore me. Nothing of substance. Just baseless attacks.
Quite substantive.
Really, look it up.
if only it were white. you'd be doing yourself a favor.
For the record, I think the CIA faded the heat for GWB's ty war results. The information was tailored to suit the ultimate consumers in the first place, so it was bound to be skewed.
Afterwards, Tenet fell on his sword, was asked to step aside. A few months later, he wa awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom.
Intelligence failures were exaggerated overall.
The fact that some were not exaggerated only makes intelligence an better scapegoat. Bush threw the CIA under the bus and made a loyal man quit, rather than lead by taking responsibility, and outworking everyone else. But that wasn't GWB either.
None of you have the correct definition right anyway.
Libel is what's being committed here.
No .
Very plausible,
for that to happen, those consumers that wanted the ed up intel had to exist during the clinton era since the info was all clinton era info. So who do you think these suitors are?
I knew the definition -- I just wasn't spoon feeding it to WC. I wanted to see if he would look it up. Where to you find my calling it by any other name in this thread? Please link it for me.
good for you.
I knew the definition -- .
Where to you find my calling it by any other name in this thread? Please link it for me.
Maybe you can tell us.
The intel always existed -- it was a question of how reliable it was deemed. There were many bits of intel that the CIA thought were compete crap. That's why Rummy whipped up a new office to review the intel outside of the CIA.
Joooooooooos!!!
no seriously, i don't have the slightest idea, i just know that the intelligence preexisted the bush 2 era.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
