Yeah, those are pretty bad too.![]()
.
Yeah, those are pretty bad too.![]()
FTW
http://media.www.thehullabaloo.com/m...-3216966.shtml
In July 2005, a man named Kenneth Pinyan died at Enumclaw Community Hospital in Washington.
The cause of death was deemed to be a perforated colon due to sexual intercourse - with a horse.
A media frenzy erupted as the investigators' search led to a barn on a nearby farm. Unbeknownst to the farm's owners, the property had evolved into a gathering place for a group of zoophiles, members of society who have a sexual affinity for animals.
It soon came to light that the group of "zoos" had been meeting at the farm to copulate with animals for some time. During these sessions, participants filmed some of the animal-human sex, which was later distributed on the Internet.
Enter "Zoo," a do entary written by Charles Mudede and Robinson Devor. Devor directed the project, which was released in early 2007 and won high praise at Sundance.
There is no easy way to approach the subject of the film - zoophilia in general or the uniquely tragic case of Pinyan in particular - and Devor should be applauded for his effort. He has created an undeniably beautiful, almost ethereal work.
The film is sublime in its cinematography and stylish in its editing, with numerous long takes of forest and countryside. The voiceover narration is mainly provided by two of Pinyan's fellow zoos and an animal advocate involved in the case.
The paramount truism of film analysis is that form is inseparable from content. For those who are not zoophiles, "Zoo" has made the strongest case yet for an exception where form and content can, and should, be separated. It is unlikely that viewers will be able to fully appreciate the practices discussed in the do entary, though one would be hard-pressed to deny the artistic value of the film. This judgment is obvious - the film is gorgeous, though zoophilia tends to repel. However, the judgment is obviously not universal: Pinyan and his crew clearly enjoyed sex with horses.
The most compelling aspect of "Zoo" is Devor's exploration into the double life Pinyan led before his untimely and unlucky end.
A highly paid weapons engineer for Boeing, Pinyan was forced to grapple with the notion that, regardless of the seemingly abstract nature of his work, his toil made him complicit in the mass destruction of human life. Whether or not this was a factor in his (ultimately fatal) zoophilia is left open to debate - just one of the many questions left unanswered by a film which is, essentially, about a man who was sodomized to death by a horse.
Bottom Line: The potential for a crude joke placed here is very great, but no thanks. "Zoo" takes a novel approach to the do entary form in order to cover a subject considered highly taboo in our society.
Sick !!!! He deserved to die.
The dude liked banging horses. Can't fault him for that.
Lickin a girls ass is much safer!![]()
im sorry, thats messed up
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)