Kendrick Perkins: "Rose will never have another game like that against us."

[Allanon]

Jordan his rookie year gave the series away to the Celtics, look at what he has achieved. I dont know what youre trying to say here.

Jordan in his early years was also considered a good player but a loser.

So Rose (if he gives the series away) is a loser until he proves otherwise, I'm cool with that.

[Spursfan092120]

Bulletin board material?

[Morg1411]

Probably, I only watched about 30 Bulls games. Most of the games I watched, the Bulls lost. There were no comebacks, no rallies.

But I have an open mind, let's watch this Bulls/Celtics series play out. Rose has the upper-hand now with 1-0 in the series. And the Celtics are without their superstar.

I don't care if KG's out, if Rose can win this series, I'll take back all I've said bad about DRose.

But, if Rose gives this series back to the Celtics, he's just being the Derrick Rose that I've seen too many times before.

Though I'm not sure which games you watched, the Bulls have been a vastly improved game since the trade deadline landed them their current roster. The current rotation has been on a tear. While they have mental lapses and occasionally stumble a step backwards to their "we suck" early season play, the Bulls have overall been very consistent coming into the late stretch of the regular season and, as we've seen, on into the Playoffs.

Now, that being said, I think the C's still have the edge in this series, but I'm glad that the Bulls have already given them something to think about. I originally stated that this would be a repeat of the Celtics first round series against the Hawks last season; after that Game 1, I think this series is going to be even better.

[Tacker]

Jordan in his early years was also considered a good player but a loser.

So Rose (if he gives the series away) is a loser until he proves otherwise, I'm cool with that.

Define loser in that statement.

[Allanon]

Define loser in that statement.

Not a winner.

[Morg1411]

Define loser in that statement.

Not a winner.

[nkdlunch]

Jordan in his early years was also considered a good player but a loser.

So Rose (if he gives the series away) is a loser until he proves otherwise, I'm cool with that.

So... Jordan was a loser in his rookie year because he did not manage to beat the Celtics dynasty in his 1st year on the league???

you are really sounding like an idiot.

[Tacker]

Not a winner.

So does that mean every player in the NBA are losers? I still dont understand, what criteria are you basing this on. What player can be classified as a winner and loser?

[Allanon]

So... Jordan was a loser in his rookie year because he did not manage to beat the Celtics dynasty in his 1st year on the league???

you are really sounding like an idiot.

No dumbass, he was considered a loser for many more years after that, not just his rookie year.

Jordan didn't become a winner until his late 20's.

[Allanon]

So does that mean every player in the NBA are losers? I still dont understand, what criteria are you basing this on. What player can be classified as a winner and loser?

We're talking about Derrick Rose being the best point guard in the NBA. People said he was as good as CP3/DWill RIGHT NOW.

If he was as good, he would win that Playoff series as CP3/Dwill have already won playoff series.

This is against a KG-less Celtics team, but I'll cut him some slack.

[nkdlunch]

No dumbass, he was considered a loser for many more years after that, not just his rookie year.

Jordan didn't become a winner until his late 20's.

nobody thought Jordan was a loser in his rookie year, except morons like you.

So Rose wins this round and he is going to instantly become a winner?

on that note, KObe is still a loser since he never won a ring without Shaq's help.

[Tacker]

We're talking about Derrick Rose being the best point guard in the NBA. People said he was as good as CP3/DWill RIGHT NOW.

If he was as good, he would win that Playoff series as CP3/Dwill have already won playoff series.

This is against a KG-less Celtics team, but I'll cut him some slack.

Im not People and this answer doesnt answer my question.

"So does that mean every player in the NBA are losers? I still dont understand, what criteria are you basing this on. What player can be classified as a winner and loser?"


Thats the question I want you to answer.

[Allanon]

nobody thought Jordan was a loser in his rookie year, except morons like you.

So Rose wins this round and he is going to instantly become a winner?

No dumb , if Rose wins this round, that means he is and has been the winner everybody thinks he is. He would be living up to the lofty expectations and hype.

[nkdlunch]

No dumb , if Rose wins this round, that means he is and has been the winner everybody thinks he is.

that makes no sense. You're pathetic

[Allanon]

that makes no sense. You're pathetic

You're a stupid mother er who can't comprehend. Everybody says he's great and a winner.

He won't "instantly become a winner" like you said because he already is in alot of people's eyes.

"He's just doing what he's supposed to do". -- Spursdynasty.

[duncan228]

Thats the question I want you to answer.

I wonder if you'll get an answer. I didn't.

[BUMP]

when you get owned by the plagerizer and then have to quote SpursDynasty to save your argument its time to give up, no offense

[JamStone]

I looked it up. In his rookie season, Michael Jordan didn't even lose to a defending championship Boston Celtics team in the first round. His Chicago Bulls team lost to the Terry mings Milwaukee Bucks in the first round of the playoffs his rookie season.

[Allanon]

when you get owned by the plagerizer and then have to quote SpursDynasty to save your argument its time to give up, no offense

And where was I owned by the plagiarizer?

I felt dirty quoting SD, but he speaketh the truth.


ps. And what's your problem Bump? I never on the Mavs. You and I never had any beef and I thought your trolls were pretty damn good.

Alrighty then, you want to start , you'll have it.

[Tacker]

I looked it up. In his rookie season, Michael Jordan didn't even lose to a defending championship Boston Celtics team in the first round. His Chicago Bulls team lost to the Terry mings Milwaukee Bucks in the first round of the playoffs his rookie season.

Whoever he faced, he is still considered a loser according to Allanon

[Allanon]

Whoever he faced, he is still considered a loser according to Allanon

So MJ in his early 20's was a winner according to you?

And since plagiarizing was brought up by Bump, why don't you answer Duncan228's question?

[Tacker]

So does that mean every player in the NBA are losers? I still dont understand, what criteria are you basing this on. What player can be classified as a winner and loser

Answer this Allanon

[Tacker]

So MJ in his early 20's was a winner according to you?

And since plagiarizing was brought up by Bump, why don't you answer Duncan228's question?

Well it depends on how you would classify a winner or a loser. What criteria must one meet in order for him to be considered a winner?

[Allanon]

Answer this Allanon

I already answered Tacker.

People are comparing Rose to CP3/Dwill right now. CP3 and DWill have ALREADY had playoff series wins.

This is Rose's criteria, win one series.

Now answer Duncan228's question Tacker.

[Allanon]

Well it depends on how you would classify a winner or a loser. What criteria must one meet in order for him to be considered a winner?

CP3/DWill are the one's in question here. Look back, this is in direct response to Derrick Rose being the BEST POINT GUARD IN THE NBA.

Answer Duncan228, Mr. Tacker.