I don't know why I even bother. They are now rewriting dictionaries. I'm outta here!
Read all the posts. Start with the stupid post #1.
Go with 2000-today and here is what you get:
SA Spurs 3-0
LA Fakers 3-2
However, like I just posted the NBA & NFL look at the Spurs as the most impressive franchise since 1998-1999 and all have been saying it through this season.
Do what ever rocks your boat.
Last edited by SouthTexasRancher; 04-30-2009 at 12:30 AM.
Too bad it won't give them the ratings MJ's bulls did. That crap doesn't work you can't recreate something from the past and expect it to have the same buzz it did 10 years ago. MJ was an icon equivalent elvis, babe ruth, Ali, that everybody came out to see. I think that's Sterns biggest marketing mistake which is he doesn't realize MJ was a once in life time player. To me Kobe is like Tommy Gunn from Rocky 5 that he could win 5 les in a row and still wouldn't generate the buzz MJ did much like Tommy Gunn still didn't get any hype when he wont the heavy weight belt in the movie. Stern = dumbass he needs to look at the NFL model for marketing.
Yeah, go to sleep you re .
Lakers team of the decade is questionable and will come down to the le this year.
Oh and player of the decade is already Kobe. When we look back it's Kobe's decade for good and for bad. He's the player people will talk about and the player people will scorn for the same reasons.
Actually, the decade that we're in includes 1999 still...so the Spurs have 4 les..
Yeah..but at the same time...you can't be a team of the decade and have a year in that decade where you don't make the playoffs, and go 7 years without a le. That takes it away. If there is a team of the decade, it's SA...
People...we're talking about the team of the decade. A decade is 10 years...it's 2009..that means 10 years includes 1999..it's not 2010 yet..
If the Lakers win it all this year they become TOTD.
4 les, 6 Finals appearances.
I can agree the Lakers will take the lead in the TOTD if they win it this year, but if that's the case, we have to include 2010 also...so next year matters as well.
Here's your guys answer, Spurs and the Lakers are the teams of the decade.
Choking in the Finals overrides actually making it there.
Spurs win % in the Finals: 1.000
Lakers win % in Finals: sure as not 1.000
Spurs > Lakers
Making it to the finals is better than not even making it out of the west.
And decade team is neither.
The Lakers were dominant this decade than the Spurs. That 2001 WCF proves it.
Not repeating when you had 3 tries to do it this decade is worse than the Lakers losing twice this decade in the Finals.
No team's decade. Its Duncan's and Shaq's decade.
21 reasons to support abortion.
Sons, Sons! Enough with the bickering.
Being that many in here are having a hard time defining "a typical 10 year span" to call their own, I propose this:
Who has won the most championships the last 30 years?
Your Los Angeles Lakers of course.
I know, stupid comment but what the heck.
Like Doc House mentioned, I'll also give the edge to the Spurs. They have indeed been in the hunt more than the Lakers these past 10 years. It is what it is. They have 3 and we have 3 the last 120 months. The good news?
Our window is wide open and should contest for at least 3-5 years.
But still making it to the Finals 29 and taking 14 of them ain't bad either. You can't win them all. Boston has more les, but they also lost in some finals. Are you saying that Larry Bird and Magic Johnson suck cause they lost in some finals, no I don't think so. So losing in the finals happen to best one, except MJ. I'll give you that, Spurs have a winning % in the Finals, but 4, ing wow!!!! At least my Lakers made it to the finals in the 50's, 60's, 70's, 80's, no 90's thanks once again to MJ, and 00's. So it's all good if you don't have us as the totd.
Spurs have the edge as of April 2009, even with the same number of Rings.
June 2009 might sway things over to the Lakers.
THANK YOU! Couldn't have said it better myself; all this other talk is basically splitting a pea.
what about not making the playoffs at all? Or going 7 years in between les?..maybe more..you still haven't won it this year. There's nothing you can say that would put LA over the top of the Spurs as TOTD right now..period.
Wow...noobie noobie noobie. In the last 10 years Lakers have less les, been to the playoffs less times, and haven't won a le since 2002. Spurs, on the other hand, have won more les, been the the playoffs EVERY YEAR, and before this year, have won the le pretty much every other year...one series does not decide the whole decade.
This thread is further proof that Laker fans love to stroke themselves.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
