I have never heard of that happening......I could be wrong though.....do you know where I can find some good info on this particular subject?
I suggest going to theempirejournal.com and reading the information they have on this case. It is quite interesting and quite enlightening. I don't have the time to go into all of it, but they have do entation of the incestuous relationship between the lawyers, judges and doctors involved in this case. It is quite disturbing to read how many statutes were violated with regard to conflict of interest.
Read some of the information and then tell me Michael Schiavo had pure motives!
Oh, btw, I heard on talk radio that they would list her cause of death as heart failure, because that is what is going to ultimately be the result of the starvation and dehydration.
Yet, no apeals court has found evidence of wrong doing even with the world's biggest spotlight, the media, right on this case.
Manny - are you really that dense? The appeals courts are ONLY ruling on the original findings in the case - and that is what is suspect! They have consistently refused to hear any new evidence or information. That was what the Federal legislation was supposed to rectify - they were asking for a whole new look at the case - not just a ruling on the original findings. Bottom line - the Schindlers had a crappy lawyer and she made a fatal mistake that has caused all subsequent appeals to fail. Read the information on the website I mentioned - just maybe you might learn something!
I know exactly what is going on, and they looked at the new evidence and deemed it irrelevent!
Appelas do look at new evidence in order to see if it would have changed the outcome of the first trial.
Are YOU that ing dense?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote