My point was just that the grass isn't always greener on the other side. There are those Spurs fans (not talking about you, specifically) that will always go with the unknown product over the known player. For example, if you asked Spurs fans if they'd rather have Splitter or Pau Gasol, there'd be that contingent that goes with Splitter.
I agree with you that a bad player with NBA experience shouldn't automatically be given an advantage simply due to having NBA experience.
I remember most people being upset about signing him. I know I wasn't the world's biggest Elson fan
I was talking about Spurs fans in general, not you. I think we've both agreed that we'd like to see Sanikidze given a legitimate chance and at least give him a season to show what he can do in Austin. IIRC, our stances are relatively similar on Javtokas as well.
I was just cautioning against the sentiment that ends up overrating the unknown.
Yeah, I know you are one of the few people who have actually taken the time to watch the prospects
And yeah, some of that camera work combined with the awkward presentation can make the whole experience nauseating
Yeah, I'm sure if you watched him, you probably could tell he wasn't very good. But you have to admit there'd be those who would see his 28 point and 15 rebound average while on Holland and his high rebounding rate in Euroleague and think Elson could become the next Dwight Howard simply because he'd be unknown.
It's a tough balance to figure out how much NBA experience is really worth. Unfortunately, the Spurs haven't been too good at figuring out that balance as of late. It's like they went from overrating foreign talent to underrating foreign talent midstream.

Reply With Quote


. End of rant