Reply With Quote
spursncowboys just catches at words and free associates. There's not much evidence he pays attention to what people actually say. He just likes to belittle others for not sharing his viewpoint.
Thank you.
spursncowboys just catches at words and free associates. There's not much evidence he pays attention to what people actually say. He just likes to belittle others for not sharing his viewpoint.
Prove me wrong, spursncowboys.
Proverbs 26:4 When arguing with fools, don't answer their foolish arguments, or you will become as foolish as they are.There is a reason for that you haven't quite picked up on yet. I got a feeling you should be able to, but may be even more stupid than I think.
And I think you are very stupid. You couldn't even figure out that first sentence.
Of course I do.I can't help but notice you didn't even attempt to answer the question -- why does NATO exist in the first place? Why was it created?
Nah, it's like anyone calling you stupid -- they'd be right.
I'll ask again -- why was NATO formed?
saved by the bible?
Why was NATO formed, spursncowboys?
How am I belittling? I say what I think. I am not trying to win people over or to exist in a higher realm of intellect. Why so much of this attack at personal things. Why not go after what comments on my post? Does chumpdump and shasta get pushed around at work so they have to exert testoterone through a computer? I like liberals. I've had three liberals in my house before.
You did this to me before where I spent half my time explaining things to you. This is your silly game you do. Im not wasting my time doing it. If you want to know google it or go to nato.org. or wikipedia. It's not that hard.
No, I already know -- I don't think you know.
Why was NATO formed, spursncowboys?
Well, Russia is expressing it's gra ude for the U. S. dropping the missile defense shields for Eastern Europe.
Russia to modernize Cuba’s military
We're.in.the.best.of.hands.
Smartest.diplomacy.ever.
Seriously, it's as if Russia said, "Thanks for exposing Eastern Europe at our request now, as a return favor, we're going to bring the nearest communist country, to your shores, up to speed militarily."
So you are afraid Cuba is going to invade the US?
Clearly.
Everybody says what they think. It just seems you can't countenance contrary views without calling posters appeasers or referring to Saul Alinsky. This is dishonest, and it raises questions about whether you pay attention to what people really say. If you relied less on off the rack political cant and cliche, weren't so quick to dismiss posters as deluded radicals, and paid more attention to the actual topics, you'd have more credibility in my book.
I did above, and you ignored me.Why so much of this attack at personal things. Why not go after what comments on my post? Does chumpdump and shasta get pushed around at work so they have to exert testoterone through a computer? I like liberals. I've had three liberals in my house before.
If you care to start addressing the topic, spurncowboys, I'm more than willing to discuss it with you.
I would very much like to stay on topic. It is hard with these "your stupid" comments and then its more about you defending yourself than staying on topic. Every forum I have been is loaded with these type of people.
I respect your opinion. I would like to hope that you keep that kind level of standard to all on here. About the Alinskey and appeaser comment. I will try and not to name call. If I use one of these loaded phrases, I will make sure it is my view they are that.
On topic:
KJV is for southern baptist and priests. NIV 4 Life!!
What I get from that is that even though fools are having a good time, theres no worth to it.
Like the crackling of thorns under the pot, so is the laughter of fools. This too is meaningless. - NIV
You're a troll
Last edited by spursncowboys; 09-19-2009 at 03:56 PM.
If you're not careful, you could turn into one too.
I pick and choose my battles. Everyone does really. In fairness though, you're the one who started the name calling in this thread.I respect your opinion. I would like to hope that you keep that kind level of standard to all on here.
Why not just argue for your own views? Is that so hard for you?About the Alinskey and appeaser comment. I will try and not to name call. If I use one of these loaded phrases, I will make sure it is my view they are that.
I won't even go into spelling smack in an attempt to stay on topic.
Why was NATO formed, spursncowboys?
If someone fits the definition of an apeaser, then what is so wrong about me calling him an appeaser? It's not about calling someone a name.
Ok. Define your term, then define the appeasement. Then show how it applies to posters here.
So far, you haven't made your case.
Obama dropping the missile defense system to have better relations with Russia is appeasement.
How much territory was ceded to Russia because of this?
I guess you missed the Washington Times article about our missile deal with Turkey, or Sec'y Gates's intention to use Trident missiles we have on submarines right now to do the same thing as missile defense systems we haven't even deployed yet.
Would any of the foregoing -- all verifiable and linked in the thread -- cause you to reexamine your premises?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
