Reply With Quote
It's not my fault you never answered the question.
When people are afraid to answer, it's usually because they are at work.
Why are you afraid to answer?
Stupid the queen is pissing away on our money because she is a lazy good for nothing who hates America.
It's not my fault you never answered the question.
When people are afraid to answer, it's usually because they are at work.
Why are you afraid to answer?
If you took the whole day off to post on this board, then it's clear you do not work as much as Mrs. Obama.
Wrong again. Its clear why you ask questions all the time, when you give your thoughts you are wrong. You act as if 40 post on a website is like taking a airplane from DC to NYC,hoping on a helicopter to meet your limo to take you to dinner, then to a Broadway play. After the play you get back in the limo for a ride to the helicopter so that can take you to the airplane to fly back to DC. Now that would take up a whole day if you know what I mean.
I wonder if her 20 "attendants got paid while she was working her free ride on the American people that day.
So what did you do today while making those 40 posts?
I ask questions because I eventually hit on one people like you are afraid to answer.
Why are you afraid to answer any questions?
limo...jet.....helicopter....broadway play......
that
Hey dumb where is the china now.....oh yeah in the whitehouse unless of course the clintons didn't manage to sneak back in and lift it.
who needs fine china when you lift 12 billion?
You ask questions because you are affraid to give your opinion. You rather spend your time dissecting others who disagree with you and in doing so you get some sort of freakish satisfaction out of it.
Queen Obama has no business taking advantage of the system. 20 "attendants" is ridiculous to have just because you are married to the President of the USA. We are not even talking about all the other people that pamper her. Why don't you spend time worrying about how our government spends our money instead of worrying what people like me are doing.
What did you do today while you were posting?
Answer and I'll give you my opinion on it.
Were you worried in October of 2008?Queen Obama has no business taking advantage of the system. 20 "attendants" is ridiculous to have just because you are married to the President of the USA. We are not even talking about all the other people that pamper her. Why don't you spend time worrying about how our government spends our money instead of worrying what people like me are doing.
I was disappointed I could not vote for Clinton.
That's not what I was asking. Were you worried about these frivolous positions in October 2008?
Already did. Sounds a little high, but not that much for someone with a first lady's schedule and duties. I imagine they are all pretty busy.
Now, what were you doing all day while posting?
I'll let you know when you pay my salary.
You were either working or you weren't.
I wasn't. I was done for the week.
Why are you such a pussy when asked a simple question?
It's none of your business.
You were either working or you weren't.
I wasn't. I was done for the week.
Why are you such a pussy when asked a simple question?
Since you became such a hemorrhagic vagina when asked if you were working (like DarrinS did), it's safe to assume you were working -- and if you weren't working, it's safe to assume the first lady did more than you did today.
Continuing to use the word attendants is stupid. These are White House Staffers.
They're czars.
There should be a tea party about this!
Again you are making what you think is a educated guess. Don't be so bitter and angry. Be proud that you and I agree the 20 "attendants" is too much for the Queen to have.
You can clear it up with a one word answer to the question: Did you post from work today?
Again, you are being a pussy about it.I am nether. Don't be such a pussy and say whether you posted form work today or not.Don't be so bitter and angry.Nah, I'd have to see what each one does during the course of a work week.Be proud that you and I agree the 20 "attendants" is too much for the Queen to have.
If one spent all day posting on a message board like you did, I would say that one isn't necessary.
Did you post from work today?
Reading is fundamental you ing jerkoff...
I didn't imply it was taken. Of course it was for the White House. So is the First Lady's staff.
Anybody who didn't say , at the time, about Laura Bush spending $150,000 on ing plates and tea cups, doesn't get to say a thing about congress paying any of the current White House staffers the equivalent sum for a years worth of work.
Attacks from these people strike me as hypocritical. It makes me think that there's another motive? A hidden agenda? Racism. Hatred. General conservative s baggery... Who's to say?
I have no problem with the staff...
And, if I'm not mistaken, every First Lady is expected to add their personal touch to the White House "China Room" by ordering new china. I suspect Mic e Obama will do the same at some point.
Again, I have no problem with that either. It's a tradition.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
