I was recreating a resume. I wouldn't make Obama's resume. BHO would make his own resume. I had to think what he might put down for work history. I never said he was a drug dealer. I think someone should have asked by now though.
You're the one who always brings up the gay angle.
You're the one who wants to be gay and to have other men be gay for you.
It's ok. God will still love you.
Almost.
I was recreating a resume. I wouldn't make Obama's resume. BHO would make his own resume. I had to think what he might put down for work history. I never said he was a drug dealer. I think someone should have asked by now though.
who cares?
Why would anyone ask that?
Can you give some examples of how I am a mindless s ? Why can you not use anything beside assumptions and calling names?
I am wondering why no "journalist" have asked him any drug questions.
Not the cheerleaders. However they don't decide what is news.
ACORN was an attempt to hinder Obama's and ,democrats in general, from winning elections is 2008. If Fox was so concerned about organizations who used tax payer money to do bad things I would assume that 8 billion dollars of missing tax payer funds outweigh 53 million dollars over 20 yrs...A real news organization wouldn't have ignored the larger story like fox did..
So you didn't bring out your bread and butter, whole "i'm rubber you're glue, whatever you say bounces off me and sticks to you!" tactic... almost.
Maybe you could almost not try to come across as ironic when bashing someone one for bringing up the gay angle too.
You absolutely did when you "recreated" his resume.
What's wrong with drug dealers? If anything you should look at that as a plus. Your posting methods and logic pays homage to them.
How do my posting methods and logic pay homage to drug dealers?
That is your opinion about why Fox broke the story. That same kind of thinking would mean that the rest of the media sat on it because they wanted to help Obama.
What story exactly are you talking about that Fox didn't talk about?
They are a testament to the effects of drugs on the brain.
it was 12 billion.
Oh shoot guys. I totally forgot CBS fabricated do ents to hinder GW Bush.
I thought this was only a FOX news tactic.
That's your interpretation, even after I helped to explain my post. You think what you want. It's a shame this is not a closed topic since Obama never explained his drug use and no one asked.
How so? Do you do drugs regularly?
He did explain it. It's in his book. If you think he was a drug dealer maybe you should read it.
I don't read autobiographies from people who have accomplished nothing except getting elected.
I think i've been around this earth long enough to interact with enough people of all stripes to see how drugs can affect one's condition. Nobody needs to take them to know of their affects. But this is common sense.. and i'm not surprised such things like these would stump you. I'll call this Exhibit A.
You're content believing whatever you pull out of your ass. I understand.
Which drugs?
Could you conceive of colors if you were blind?Nobody needs to take them to know of their affects.
It is?But this is common sense..
I only asked a question which has yet to be answered.and i'm not surprised such things like these would stump you.
Exhibit A of how my posts make you feel high?I'll call this Exhibit A.
Yeah.. i don't know how buying his book would clear any charges against him. He's not going to write self incriminating things in it. He's going to fluff his biography.
Once again, common sense fails Shasta.
There have been charges placed against him? Are you talking about SnC claiming he was a drug dealer?
And that's all we have. Unless you're hiding a long forgotten arrest record.He's not going to write self incriminating things in it. He's going to fluff his biography.
Do you have any evidence he dealt drugs?Once again, common sense fails Shasta.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)