Whott's girlfriend's brilliance on display

[whottt]

It fits the definition fine. It's not my fault there is a contradiction inherent in it.

I don't really see much of a contradiction, I mean don't see anything about returning things to the way before one was born being implied in that definition. It's a conclusion you can draw but there's certainly nothing concrete to back that up. If anything I'd say before one was bon qualifies the as radicalism or fundamentalism or at the least Ultra Conservative.

Oh, this coin phrase placement "issue" is definitely stupid. Your slavish agreement with Palin on this pressing issue pretty much proves it.

My bad, I'll try to be more like you guys are with Obama.

[ChumpDumper]

So are you saying that MLK day isn't a traditional holiday since at one time it wasn't around?

No, since all holidays were not around at one time.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't really see much of a contradiction, I mean don't see anything about returning things to the way before one was born being implied in that definition. It's a conclusion you can draw but there's certainly nothing concrete to back that up. If anything I'd say before one was bon qualifies the as radicalism or fundamentalism or at the least Ultra Conservative.

Really? So anyone saying they want to return the country to the values of the founding fathers is a radical according to you.

My bad, I'll try to be more like you guys are with Obama.

Did he voice an opinion about the placement? Link?

[whottt]

Really? So anyone saying they want to return the country to the values of the founding fathers is a radical according to you.

Not in and of itself no.


Do you need me to explain why?

[ChumpDumper]

Not in and of itself no.


Do you need me to explain why?

You don't have to explain why you contradict yourself so often.

[whottt]

Exactly how and when did I contradict myself?

Look before you leap old foot.

[whottt]

look at whottt getting all philosophical

I am always philosphical, it's passive aggressive I usually am not.

[Ignignokt]

No, since all holidays were not around at one time.

so none of the holidays are traditional, right?

[ChumpDumper]

so none of the holidays are traditional, right?

Is that your definition?

[Ignignokt]

Really? So anyone saying they want to return the country to the values of the founding fathers is a radical according to you.

So you're saying that there's only two options, traditional and radical?

[Ignignokt]

Is that your definition?

i'm asking you, based off your awnser. simple question.

i'll expect a yes or a no.

[ChumpDumper]

So you're saying that there's only two options, traditional and radical?

I think others were offered, but apparently it's a fair characterization.

i'm asking you, based off your awnser. simple question.

i'll expect a yes or a no.

Why would you expect what you never give?

You broke your forum rap oath.

I don't personally know when something becomes a tradition. You guys are the ones defining it so -- definitively.

[Ignignokt]

I think others were offered, but apparently it's a fair characterization.

Why would you expect what you never give?

You broke your forum rap oath.

I don't see a yes or a no.

why do you hate responding to your own stupidity?

[Ignignokt]

You broke your forum rap oath.

I'm not a journalist, i wish you actually knew how to read.

[ChumpDumper]

I don't see a yes or a no.

why do you hate responding to your own stupidity?

See answer above.

I rapped no oath.

[Ignignokt]

See answer above.

I rapped no oath.

You awnsered a question that wasn't asked here, why can't you get over arguing with strawmen?

[ChumpDumper]

I'm not a journalist, i wish you actually knew how to read.

They aren't bound by oaths either.

I wish you could actually comprehend that.

[ChumpDumper]

You awnsered a question that wasn't asked here, why can't you get over arguing with strawmen?

Depends on the definition.

It certainly has been proved that the there is no set definition. Some certainly are traditional, but I can't tell you when they became that way.

[Ignignokt]

They aren't bound by oaths either.

I wish you could actually comprehend that.

I already acknowledge that in the other thread, you decided to bring it up in this one.


Again, do you want to argue with old arguments or the ones presented to you in your face which you've shown you're to weak to observe?

[Ignignokt]

Depends on the definition.

It certainly has been proved that the there is no set definition. Some certainly are traditional, but I can't tell you when they became that way.

Not in and of itself no.


Do you need me to explain why?

Thank me for helping you agree with WHott.

Just a simple thank you, thanks.

[ChumpDumper]

I already acknowledge that in the other thread, you decided to bring it up in this one.


Again, do you want to argue with old arguments or the ones presented to you in your face which you've shown you're to weak to observe?

I'm dealing with one by referencing the other.

If it makes you upset, you shouldn't have brought up the stupidly irrelevant non-binding, non-taken Moyeratic rap oath in the other thread.

[ChumpDumper]

Thank me for helping you agree with WHott.

Just a simple thank you, thanks.

I never outright disagreed with him. I'm just trying to figure out what the actual definition is.

What is yours?

[Ignignokt]

I never disagreed with him. I'm just trying to figure out what the actual definition is.

You can also thank me for helping you agree with Sarah Palin.


just a simple thank you is all.

[ChumpDumper]

You can also thank me for helping you agree with Sarah Palin.


just a simple thank you is all.

What is her definition?

[Ignignokt]

If A = B and B = C , then A = C.

Chump is for reinstating "In God We Trust" to it's proper location on the coin, and he's for SarahPAC.

Sorry board liberals.