Reply With Quote
lather. rinse. repeat.
ha... well this thread is certainly going as scheduled.
lather. rinse. repeat.
When are you gonna start talking about how important gossip articles are to american society?
lather. rinse. repeat.
I never did. You the one who can't shut up about it.
The article isn't gossip.
It lists things pitbull 's ghost writer wrote and then refutes them.
No pitbull lovers here have refuted any of the refutations.
So what did you tell WC? ANd how did it pertain to this thread?
Refutes them with what?
It was off topic. Are you policing topicality now, gtown?
Nah, You got to question authority every once in a while.It was off topic. Are you policing topicality now, gtown?
They all seem to end up like this.
I have stated my disbelief of the Huffington Post making an accurate claim. The books not out yet. As far as I care, the content that started this thread is no better than the tabloids that print articles like alien babies. I think such a thread is too premature to waste much time on.
And yet you and Chump Dumper have no problem believing this book?
The Irony!
"disbelief of the Huffington Post making an accurate claim"
They have a copy of the book, as do many reviewers and media insiders, and which is the case for any pre-publication book, but for you that's not fair or acceptable or believable.
They read the book "critically", which you haven't done and, among many others to come, certainly, have pointed out self-serving spin, falsehoods, and lies. There seems to be lots of score-evening vs the McLiar crowd, esp Schmidt.
So you think HuffPo, NYTimes, and others are deliberately misquoting from her book?
It sure looks likes pitbull 's ghost writer's book is gonna get ripped, aka "picked on", because it's full of do entable .
LOL...
Yep, they get critical about anything they can spin!
Liberals just can't be trusted to tell the truth or be objective.
"they get critical about anything they can spin"
HuffPo isn't the only one. warhero/songbird McLiar's people are calling her a liar, too, and there will be plenty of others.
Her credibility will be even lower.
I would argue that the vast majority of the discussion in this thread so far has centered around the source of the article, and not the content.
Which really says a lot about the actual content.
The righties refuse to verify,validate the direct quotes from the book and refuse to refute how HuffPo et al are ripping the book's falsehoods.
The book will probably not drag her disapproval rating higher, since it's already something like a fatal/non-electable 75%, even in Alaska.
I think it's stupid to discuss the content until we read the book.
I think it's stupid to ignore refutation of direct quotes from the book because one blindly supports a loser pitbull .
Do you think the book will change between now and Tuesday? Probably so, since Magical Thinking is the basis of right-wing/conservative "principles".
or copies to reviewers were seeded with dirty-tricks lies to make the reviewers look bad?
Yeah, I suppose her account is much more authentic.
Thanks a lot.
It's not free speech when you have an unwilling captive audience. If he says anything partisan, or of an agenda type item, Millions of parents will be outraged.
Schools are a place of learning. Not for political indoctrination. Do you liberals really believe that's not his intent?
well jack she is a liar so are you going to crucify her?
This woman has the right people hating her. I respect that.
They have developed a case of mass delusion. Logic and reason matter not. They are nihilistic drones who purposefully subvert reality as if they were figures from an Orwellian dystopia. It's frightening and disgusting that people could allow themselves to become so manipulated.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
