It's laughable how you firmly believe that my comment somehow invalidates anything else I have to say. That you naively believe that to be your "ace up the sleeve" argument.... please.![]()
![]()
No one's forcing you to do anything... go burn an American Flag if you so desire (it's a form of protected speech)...
The President, on the other hand, is the Head of State... even if his speech is protected by the same cons utional right, imagine if he went around burning U.S. Flags? (extreme example, I know)... what type of message would that send?
geessh.
Deviating from a tradition during the Pledge of Allegiance is by no means that inciting... but the analogy holds... elected officials represent this nation... they have to uphold our patriotic ideals even if you or I don't have to. As I have tried to explain, Obama's blunder is justified if his mind wasn't all there... if he were distracted... trying to justify a willful deviation from said tradition however, requires some form of explanation on his part.... Apologists trying to downplay it simply doesn't cut it...
It's laughable how you firmly believe that my comment somehow invalidates anything else I have to say. That you naively believe that to be your "ace up the sleeve" argument.... please.![]()
![]()
watch out everybody. he's still backing up.
Backing up?
I believe in demons and angels. I've never denied that belief.
But please clambake... enlighten us on why that has anything to do with the subject at hand?![]()
have you made your meaningful, mandatory pledge today?
Nice dodge... who is backpedaling now?
As for your question,
If I answer "yes" you'll snicker at it...
If I answer "no" you'll be snide about that too...
So how about I answer, "it's none of your business..."![]()
you are. you demanded that everyone should be required to say the pledge, until you backed up to say just elected officials. why are you treating this like some nazi over something this trivial?
damn, this and all the angels and demons surrounding you. how do you carry all these monkeys around?
your whole about this is how it is your business.As for your question,
If I answer "yes" you'll snicker at it...
If I answer "no" you'll be snide about that too...
So how about I answer, "it's none of your business..."![]()
holy , little jesus, you just back off the cliff!
Ummm... no. You and CD interpretted that way. Conveniently so I would add. All from my use of the phrase "it should be automatic" which you all took out of context to mean something I didn't convey... all for the sake of your strawman... predictably enough, when I stated that the word choice was in reference to a vestige reflex from our public schooling both of you conveniently ignored it.
Your insistence on using this particular belief of mine to invalidate anything else I have to say... has run its course. You've been called out for it. But carry on; every time you bring it up it's your Freudian way of conveying that your really can't counter what I've said.
Again, all of this is a disingenuous ploy to detract from the obvious... Obama needs to explain his rather noticeable deviation from tradition. And sadly, you haven't been able to offer one. But keep spinning it.![]()
Why? Because you demand an answer?Obama needs to explain his rather noticeable deviation from tradition.
that's right, mother er, he does!
Curiosity? Because he's the only President that I know of to publically do so while the cameras were rolling... was he making a statement?
So you're equivocating your curiosity with a need, now? Interesting.
By the way, I have to applaud you. For someone who's so concerned about the partisanship of this forum, you've certainly done a lot to elevate the discussion to something more worthwhile.![]()
Do you make a loud beeping noise when you back up like that, Phenom?
What do you mean now??? I stated so in the first couple of posts... But no, 'Obama is above reproach and his actions shalt not be questioned ever"... his apologists spelled that out pretty clearly by embodying indignation at the mere suggestion that such a deviation merited an explanation... Even though I stated by the second or third post, that my question itself was fairly innocuous... of course that wasn't enough for them.
I don't vote along a straight-party ticket.... never have. So I don't recourse to arguing along those lines either.
So what do you want to talk about?
I believe that anthropomorphic global warming has been a political agenda for several years now. As such, I believe that cap & trade policies are detrimental to the economic stability of our energy sector...
I believe in the sanc y of life.
As a citizen I believe that I have the right to lobby and influnce the law-making process in favor of my beliefs just as you or any other citizen has the same right to lobby likewise for theirs.
I can argue the points without having to resort to name calling certain party representatives, or slinging mud... unfortunately, many here are unable to do so....
Last edited by Phenomanul; 11-20-2009 at 03:48 PM.
Do you like topling over along with your strawmen?
Your persistence is the stuff of legend around these parts... for good or bad unfortunately.![]()
![]()
For the last time... I don't care about what you or anyone else wishing to cling to your strawman do during the Pledge of Allegiance. I certainly care what my Head of State does during his. Comprende amigo?![]()
But you care about what everybody does. You said so. Comprende amigo?
you should take a break from this disaster.
call it a sabbatical.
I believe you're stuck on the wrong track. Your misinterpretation of my comment does little to explain why Obama deviated from a pretty standard tradition... but keep repeating that track. The more you do, the more my point is strengthened....
In fact... find some other way to play around with my words, twist them and hurl them back at me somehow... You did in fact admit to being quite the semantical freak. See, unlike your assertions, that one isn't subject to interpretation.
oh, you want to change it to standard. got it.
I believe you were stuck on the wrong track, then you tried to back out of it.
Beeeeeeep-beeeeeeeep-beeeeeeep-beeeeeep
The more you try to back up, the more my point is strengthened![]()
He's a roadrunner?
So, to sum things up, Sherry Hacket is a giant .
Nothing valid, move along
That would be a shorter Beep-beep.
What are you still doing here? I thought we established you added no meaningful value to the discussion...
go on... scatttt....
![]()
when are you going to put it in drive?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)