Well, as William Blake once said, opposition is true friendship.
How a short line can provide a battle !
Well, as William Blake once said, opposition is true friendship.
Agreed. Flabbergasted to see Splitter get 10 seconds after a bust-out performance in the previous game. Given Pop's recent history, I'd say it's more to do with micro-management than savvy roster management.
We're rolling with wins now, but Blair over Splitter in the rotation seems like recipe for disappointment down the line.
No, it's cool. Grades by nature cause debate. It's obviously subjective so there are going to be different point of views. I'd be worried if we were all in agreement with each grade.
That's fine. As long as you are disagreeing knowing how the grades are based, I have no problem. And I truly did appreciate the "timvp is a homer to PLAYER X and expects too much from PLAYER Y". I can add it to my collection.
After re-watching the game, I would elevate Parker's grade to "A". When I watched it live, it appeared to me that Parker gave up middle to Nelson a few times -- which was the reason why I thought his defense wasn't up to par. But watching again, I realized it was part of the gameplan to make Nelson drive and not allow him to rotate the ball along the perimeter to the three-point shooters. So what I thought was Parker not closing out properly was actually Parker following Pop's orders.
EVAY was right. Props.![]()
I don't know why everyone cares so much about these damns grades. They're really just four our amusement. How about we just enjoy the games and see how we look in the standings.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)