Basketball-reference has this nice Head2Head tool that will show us just that:
Parker career: 33pmg, 16.7ppg on 49.3% shooting, 5.7 assists, 3 rbds, 1 steal, 2.5 TOs
Parker vs Deron: 33mpg, 19.9ppg on 54.2% shooting, 5.8 assists, 2.3 rbds, 0.9 steals, 2.9 TOs
Deron career: 35.5mpg, 17.3 ppg on 46.7% shooting, 9.1 assists, 3.2 rbds, 1 steal, 3 TOs
Deron vs Parker: 35.5mpg, 17.9ppg on 47.6% shooting, 7.5 assists, 3.1 rbds, 0.8 steals, 2.8 TOs
So apart from the fact that Parker scores more (and shoots better) and Deron racks up fewer assists... what was supposed to be so obvious in Deron being so much better than Parker?
Source:
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...1&p2=willide01