Biggest jump ever seen in global warming gases

[Ignignokt]

None of these graphs matter. Manny, Random, And Darrin are all using confirmation bias to prove their side.

In the end, even the IPCC has stated that human beings only accomplish 4 percent of total green house gases.

So as part of the Ole ST bag of tricks.

4 Percent GOTS!!!!

[Drachen]

It has a very important meaning to me. I love to argue --obviously-- but I argue with the idea that it will lead to the revealing of the truth for the betterment of all.

To me there is nothing worse for finding the truth than those that intentionally mislead. I term them sophists perhaps for lack of a better word. Sorry if I overuse it but to me it gets directly to the core of my contempt.

Darrin clearly can not be trusted.

That is cool. I guess it's just not one of those words you hear every day and so when someone uses it with some regularity it seems out of the ordinary. Anyway back to the thread.... I think i am going to respond to Igniotgnt's (sp?) post by stealing from a post that RG posted. Watch.

[Drachen]

None of these graphs matter. Manny, Random, And Darrin are all using confirmation bias to prove their side.

In the end, even the IPCC has stated that human beings only accomplish 4 percent of total green house gases.

So as part of the Ole ST bag of tricks.

4 Percent GOTS!!!!

So then if I gave you a glass of water which contained ONLY 3.9% plutonium, then you would have no problem drinking it since it seems your argument is that this amount could have no way of being harmful.

[DarrinS]

So then if I gave you a glass of water which contained ONLY 3.9% plutonium, then you would have no problem drinking it since it seems your argument is that this amount could have no way of being harmful.

You really going with that comparison again?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You really going with that comparison again?

It only takes one exeption to disprove which the comparison does very clearly.

I do not think the 4% number is worth very much without context but even without that 4 out of 100 can have a very profound effect on a system. Think back to controls.

[DarrinS]

First video I posted in this thread puts things in perspective.

[DarrinS]

You guys can continue to be afraid of plant food. I remain unimpressed.

[ChumpDumper]

Light bulb.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

First video I posted in this thread puts things in perspective.

If you're stupid and easily misled by those with no interest in the truth then I suppose that would be the case. You know your sources are so ty that you lie about them.

That should be enough to tell any reasonable person what your thoughts on the matter are worth.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You ever going to link the study that you pulled the graph from? This may come as s surprise to you but no one other than WC takes you at your word here. So you can circle jerk with him or justify a single thing you say.

Berkeley


Earth


Surface


Temperature


If you weren't so busy having tantrums, you'd notice the answers to several of your questions were easily gleaned from info on the graphs.

Scientist who said climate change sceptics had been proved wrong accused of hiding truth by colleague

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...colleague.html

But a report to be published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation includes a graph of world average temperatures over the past ten years, drawn from the BEST project’s data and revealed on its website.

Thanks Darrin for showing us all the extent --or lack thereof-- of your character.

[DarrinS]

I have downloaded BEST's data and source code and I can replicate that graph.

[Ignignokt]

So then if I gave you a glass of water which contained ONLY 3.9% plutonium, then you would have no problem drinking it since it seems your argument is that this amount could have no way of being harmful.

That would be different.

It's more like, you think you're the enligthened one because you think drinking the Koolaid with 4 percent less cyanide is prudent.

[DarrinS]

Light bulb.

Penis pump

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I have downloaded BEST's data and source code and I can replicate that graph.

Excuse me if i don't hold my breath.

[ChumpDumper]

Penis pump

What does that mean?

[Drachen]

That would be different.

It's more like, you think you're the enligthened one because you think drinking the Koolaid with 4 percent less cyanide is prudent.

Well, that is, unless you have spent the last year building up an immunity to a glass of water with say 4% cyanide. Then tomorrow someone hands you a glass with 8% cyanide and says drink this for the jobs. It is obvious that since you have drank water with cyanide that you can drink it with more and cause NO ILL EFFECTS.

[Ignignokt]

Well, that is, unless you have spent the last year building up an immunity to a glass of water with say 4% cyanide. Then tomorrow someone hands you a glass with 8% cyanide and says drink this for the jobs. It is obvious that since you have drank water with cyanide that you can drink it with more and cause NO ILL EFFECTS.

wow!!! lol!!!

lets say i'm a level 60 wizard and i have special sheilds that deem me immortal!!

[DarrinS]

Are people still equating CO2 to plutonium and cyanide?


Your movement needs a better sales pitch. People have pretty good bull detectors. Well, some people do.

[Ignignokt]

Are people still equating CO2 to plutonium and cyanide?


Your movement needs a better sales pitch. People have pretty good bull detectors. Well, some people do.

Don't kill my mojo, go your opponents with more graphs.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Are people still equating CO2 to plutonium and cyanide?


Your movement needs a better sales pitch. People have pretty good bull detectors. Well, some people do.

Berkeley


Earth


Surface


Temperature


If you weren't so busy having tantrums, you'd notice the answers to several of your questions were easily gleaned from info on the graphs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...colleague.html

But a report to be published today by the Global Warming Policy Foundation includes a graph of world average temperatures over the past ten years, drawn from the BEST project’s data and revealed on its website.

You should shut the up about other peoples bull when you are a big ing liar. Go compile the BEST data like the think tank you lied to us about did and hope it matches up.

[Ignignokt]

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...colleague.html

You should shut the up about other peoples bull when you are a big ing liar. Go compile the BEST data like the think tank you lied to us about did and hope it matches up.

lol chart wars

[Ignignokt]

Youtube trump card >>>>> chart wars

Let it be known.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

lol chart wars

I have no competing chart. He told us he got it from BEST when in reality he got it from a mailer that got it from a think tank who will not reveal its contributors but has a clear agenda in its press releases.

[DarrinS]

Don't kill my mojo, go your opponents with more graphs.

Lol. I actually was on that side until they went all apocalyptic on me. ty "hockey stick" graphs based on sparse, proxies didn't help matters.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Lol. I actually was on that side until they went all apocalyptic on me. ty "hockey stick" graphs based on sparse, proxies didn't help matters.

Thats far better than lying about where a graph comes from to try and give it credence it doesn't deserve.