It's only LBJ vs Shaq, though.
Shaq's ceiling is a few dozen stories higher than LBJ's. He could have gotten 7-8 rings while LBJ is pretty much set on 3-4 if he plays Pippen starting next season.
I see what you did there
It's only LBJ vs Shaq, though.
Shaq's ceiling is a few dozen stories higher than LBJ's. He could have gotten 7-8 rings while LBJ is pretty much set on 3-4 if he plays Pippen starting next season.
Since LBJ's career is far from over, there's no way to tell.
A logical estimate. He needs to prop up another elite player, like Wade, in order to win. Since his success will depend on another's success, 3-4 is a pretty good guess.
This is a joke, right?
Kobe Bryant wasn't exactly helping Shaq win championships. He probably cost him at least 2.
^The proof is in the pudding:::Kobe won two without Daddy.
Daddy only won one without Kobe.
Shaq won 3 rings as the man. Put any competent shooting guard with him and they win. No way Kobe wins any of those 3 rings without Shaq.
What pudding?
And you wold not have the first three without him, so take the last two and give the first three away and what do you got? ONE LESS............Good post!
How about HOF bound Ray Allen? How'd that turn out?
Who's troll are you BTW?![]()
In those 3 years, Shaq would have won with Ray Allen as his SG without a doubt. Probably would have won 5 or 6 championships overall. Would definitely have beat the Pistons.
Shaq as the man - 3
Kobe as the man - 2
Last edited by nowhereman523; 11-13-2011 at 12:50 AM.
Now you moving the goal post.
Ok, I'll bite.
Kobe as "Robin" - 3
Shaq as "Robin" - 1
Let's go to Lederman's score card after we total it it up:
5>4. Kobe is the man.![]()
Lebron's ceiling is only low because he keeps failing. Doesn't anyone remember LBJ was supposed to be the next Jordan, with a more physical toolset?
Everyone in this thread saying, "LBJ can't help that he's a weakminded pussy" and then blasting Shaq for not staying fit... uhm... whiskey tango foxtrot? You could use the same argument to say Shaq's ceiling is lower because he wasn't mentally prepared to dedicate himself the way all the greats do.
4 is greater than 0.
How many rings would Shaq have had to win to be just an achiever? 6? 7? 10?
At least more than Kobe.
tee, hee.
Kobe: 5
Daddy: 4
I'll take:::
Kobe: 5
the bag: 4
Kobe: 5
Daddy: 4
Kobe won ZERO without Pau or Daddy though
...or Fisher. What's your point?![]()
But, Pau couldn't win a single playoff game till Kobe took him in.
Kobe won two without Daddy. Daddy only won one without Kobe.
I don't see any of this. I don't think he improves season after season, I don't think he works particularly hard and I don't think he's doing everything to achieve what he can.
Comparing Shaq's rings to Kobe's when Shaq is the reason he got the first three.
Also lets not act like Pau didn't deserve that finals mvp. Kobe should be stuck at one.
Post-shaq/pre-pau Kobe is the biggest underachiever. I mean how do miss the playoffs if you are "that good".
Yup.
Shaq -3
Kobe -2
lol losing after being up 3-1 and quitting on your team in a game 7
talk about under achieving
^
lol closer
lol clutch
lol leader
lol being called these things because you won four times as the 2nd option. Not even the 2nd option if you go by the TS% and some Lakerfans like that stat.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)