Obama caught on tape admitting to election fraud in Maine.

[RandomGuy]

Show's how stupid you are. Nothing you posted refuted election fraud. Yet I've provided proof it happened. Next.

You haven't provided proof of anything.

You have an audio clip of SOMEONE vaguely speaking about elections in an election in Maine.

You have not proven, that I can see, that the speaker was the current president.

Do you have any proof of that?

Please share with the class here, as it is the first part of showing you have what you think you have.

Put up or shut up. "Bull " has been called.

[Blake]

I love when certain morons always respond to my threads (who NEVER make real valid arguments) and they have no idea that they are on my ignore list. I everytime.

You fiend!

[Winehole23]

as I kid I was curious about the shark attack cassettes for sale in the back of the shark attack magazines I bought at the beach. never did buy a cassette, but the idea of making a fake shark attack tape still cracks me up.

[DMC]

There is some serious hyperbole going on in his forum. Reads like a CNN comments section. It's the Coulter - Moore crowds going at it with the rest of us just watching with amusement.

[SA210]

With this shocking evidence, why hasn't Obama been impeached yet?

http://spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=192603

[SA210]

You haven't provided proof of anything.

You have an audio clip of SOMEONE vaguely speaking about elections in an election in Maine.

You have not proven, that I can see, that the speaker was the current president.

Do you have any proof of that?

Please share with the class here, as it is the first part of showing you have what you think you have.

Put up or shut up. "Bull " has been called.

Seems like you lie like Chump. You need to shut up. You haven't put up anything but insults, and insults don't win arguments even though you like to feel like it does. I posted many links to media coverage of the fraud, proof. If you want to fool yourself into believing its nothing, that's your problem. I bet the world you haven't watched every video i posted, much less with an open mind. Next..sheep.


And after all that...let me know if it's ok for the President to bomb innocent babies.

[SA210]

you should probably put everyone on ignore.

Just the ones that can't argue points (which are many), instead they go straight to insults, the normal tin foil hat arguments rather than debating openly and honestly, they resort to smilies as if smilies were an argument, pretend laughing, etc. They go straight to ignore now. If I wanted to be part of their troll game, I'd go to the troll forum.

[SA210]

I resorted to the ignore function once or twice but only briefly. Got no iggy list.

btw I applaud your resourcefulness in deriving mirth from blocking the posts of others from your own scrutiny, but such a self-revelation is not -- how shall we say? -- entirely discreet.

To laugh heartily and spontaneously is is one thing, to vaunt it exaggeratedly creates an entirely different impression. If a hedonistic gain accrues to the poster regardless, there is no dilemma.

I refer you to my last post.

[ChumpDumper]

Seems like you lie like Chump. You need to shut up. You haven't put up anything but insults, and insults don't win arguments even though you like to feel like it does. I posted many links to media coverage of the fraud, proof. If you want to fool yourself into believing its nothing, that's your problem. I bet the world you haven't watched every video i posted, much less with an open mind. Next..sheep.

I bet you haven't watched every video you posted.

lol insults

And after all that...let me know if it's ok for the President to bomb innocent babies.

You make it sound more attractive every time you whine about it tbh.

[SA210]

^^^ Has no idea they are on my ignore list and I dont read their trash anymore

[ChumpDumper]

^^^ Has no idea what is actually in the videos posted

[Blake]

Just the ones that can't argue points (which are many), instead they go straight to insults, the normal tin foil hat arguments rather than debating openly and honestly, they resort to smilies as if smilies were an argument, pretend laughing, etc. They go straight to ignore now. If I wanted to be part of their troll game, I'd go to the troll forum.

Serious question: who will be going to jail for this proven election fraud?

[LnGrrrR]

Nice argument

No point in arguing with a fool.

[SA210]

No point in arguing with a fool.

That's what I say

[ChumpDumper]

^^^ Doesn't know what a stupid coward he is

[RandomGuy]

You haven't provided proof of anything.

You have an audio clip of SOMEONE vaguely speaking about elections in an election in Maine.

You have not proven, that I can see, that the speaker was the current president.

Do you have any proof of that?

Please share with the class here, as it is the first part of showing you have what you think you have.

Put up or shut up. "Bull " has been called.

Seems like you lie like Chump. You need to shut up. You haven't put up anything but insults, and insults don't win arguments even though you like to feel like it does. I posted many links to media coverage of the fraud, proof. If you want to fool yourself into believing its nothing, that's your problem. I bet the world you haven't watched every video i posted, much less with an open mind. Next..sheep.

And after all that...let me know if it's ok for the President to bomb innocent babies.

All I see is an insult or two, and you ducking the direct question.

I watched the entire 38 second clip in the OP. I am not going to bother with the others yet, but will probably get around to them eventually.

I will ask a second time.

Yes or no, can you provide some corroborating proof that the video in the OP actually *is* the current president?

[SA210]

All I see is an insult or two, and you ducking the direct question.

I watched the entire 38 second clip in the OP. I am not going to bother with the others yet, but will probably get around to them eventually.

I will ask a second time.

Yes or no, can you provide some corroborating proof that the video in the OP actually *is* the current president?

I don't pretend that it isn't him speaking like you do, it's obviously him . I'm not dumb to try to make myself think otherwise like you do. Can you prove it isn't him? And the other videos you choose not to watch help understand why he says what he says. Next.

[Blake]

who's going to jail for this proven election fraud?

[LnGrrrR]

So what you're saying is, you can't prove it SA What a maroon!

[SA210]

So what you're saying is, you can't prove it SA What a maroon!

No, I'm saying you're a moron for trying to deny that it is him, and you can't prove that it isn't.

[redzero]

No, I'm saying you're a moron for trying to deny that it is him, and you can't prove that it isn't.

Is that how burden of proof works now?

[RandomGuy]

You haven't provided proof of anything.

You have an audio clip of SOMEONE vaguely speaking about elections in an election in Maine.

You have not proven, that I can see, that the speaker was the current president.

Do you have any proof of that?

Please share with the class here, as it is the first part of showing you have what you think you have.

Put up or shut up. "Bull " has been called.

Seems like you lie like Chump. You need to shut up. You haven't put up anything but insults, and insults don't win arguments even though you like to feel like it does. I posted many links to media coverage of the fraud, proof. If you want to fool yourself into believing its nothing, that's your problem. I bet the world you haven't watched every video i posted, much less with an open mind. Next..sheep.

And after all that...let me know if it's ok for the President to bomb innocent babies.

All I see is an insult or two, and you ducking the direct question.

I watched the entire 38 second clip in the OP. I am not going to bother with the others yet, but will probably get around to them eventually.

I will ask a second time.

Yes or no, can you provide some corroborating proof that the video in the OP actually *is* the current president?

I don't pretend that it isn't him speaking like you do, it's obviously him . I'm not dumb to try to make myself think otherwise like you do. Can you prove it isn't him? And the other videos you choose not to watch help understand why he says what he says. Next.

All I see is an insult or two, and you ducking the direct question, again, although you did add the cliched "oh yeah, well prove a negative". It isn't my job to prove anything. You claimed it was the president, it is your burden of proof.
(this is a logical fallacy by the way, http://www.nizkor.org/features/falla...-of-proof.html )

I will ask a third time.

Yes or no, can you provide some corroborating proof that the video in the OP actually *is* the current president?

[jack sommerset]

Has the WH denied the audio? Is this even a topic on the national pages?I have not seen anything on it except in here but I have not gone out of my away to look for it either. God bless.

[Blake]

No, I'm saying you're a moron for trying to deny that it is him, and you can't prove that it isn't.

:rofl

[RandomGuy]

Has the WH denied the audio? Is this even a topic on the national pages?I have not seen anything on it except in here but I have not gone out of my away to look for it either. God bless.

A WH statement on it would go a way towards proving the point of the OP. May Vishnu bestowe blessings upon you.