Yes, I see your hurt starting to flare up.
Rofl you're a ing idiot.
That's kinda what we were ing at. (Or at least, I was.) the law seems to be written in a stupid way, and allows a potential instigator to get away with instigating. Even if the evidence against Zimmerman were stronger, the Stand your Ground law might still have protected him.
I'm think I'm going to go ahead and buy a firearm.
Here. You want to talk about the relative innocence of a victim? The "youths" involved in this hate crime have been charged with disorderly conduct and one with robbery. All the cries for hate crime in the Trayvon case were about politics.
I'm sure you'll have some witty comebacks about how/why this doesn't count.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/kill...ivated-attack/
You can't keep your cases properly separated.
It's because you are a proven ing idiot.
Rofl.
Really CC? You think the two situations are comparable? That Martin wasn't innocen because he attacked his follower?
What would YOU do if you were being followed? (I'd like to note here that, right or wrong, a lot of black people have a strong distrust of the police, which may have been a reason why Martin didn't just call 911. Being young and dumb doesn't help either.)
God damn you are stupid.
You are making the claim that in this case the shooter was innocent because he didn't initiate the violence while at the same time maintaining that Zimmerman is guilty of murder even though he didn't initiate the violence.
What would you have them be charged with, GSH?
A hate crime?
I know what you are trying to do and it's a failed bit.
No real surprise coming from a ing idiot like you.
I think they were both dumb, but the legal threshold for self defense is who initiated violence first.
I don't think either is innocent in the drug car you mentioned. One's a thief, and one's a drug dealer.
Who was talking about legalities?
CC, if you found someone was following you around, and you noted he was following you home, what would you do? Head straight to your house and let him know where you live? Stop somewhere and call the police? Wha would you do?
Oh you do? You realized I was using sarcasm to compare to the claims in the Zimmerman case?
Funny here just one page back you have the hook firmly planted in your big mouth...
If I was armed I would let him know I was armed and was prepared to defend myself.
If I was unarmed I would probably call 911.
According to the law, the shooter clearly committed capital murder because the shooting happened while in the commission of another felony crime (selling drugs). As I understand it self defense doesn't come into play in that situation.
And if he continued to follow you without initiating violence? Would you shoot him then?
I agree that Martin should have called 911, but I know a few black friends who won't call the police unless they absolutely have to. Just as Zimmerman didn't realiz how things would go, there's a chance this kid didn't think the cops would listen to him, wouldn't get there in time, couldn't do anything etc etc.
My point was that no one is goin to consider either of those "innocent" in the generic, non-legal sense of the word.
No, I wouldn't shoot or attack the guy just for walking behind me.
And I understand all the counter arguments about not trusting the police but Martin had the means (a cell phone) to call them. Martin apparently escalated the situation that caused his own death by initiating violence first.
TLDR
Where they fighting over skittles or something?
I'm not the Mexican judge you ing idiot.
I'm not the prosecutor you ing idiot.
I'm not the alleged nor am I his attorney, friend or family member you ing idiot.
Since I never made the claim in this thread, I therefore never made that claim at all you ing idiot.
I'm still waiting for you to lay out the plea deal set by the Mexican judge.
I concur.
so the only reason he got off was because he was Mexican!
Double post
Let's picture the same situation with two differences:
One, it was a friend or loved one being followed instead of Martin.
Two, Zimmerman doesn't have a gun.
So on Monday, your friend/loved one is telling you about this creepy guy following him/her, and how your friend/loved one turned on him and beat the out of him.
Is your first thought, "My god, you could have really hurt him, you were in the wrong" or is it, " yeah, good job, that will teach him not to snoop"?
LOL, butthurt are we?
The article clearly stated:
The plea deal was to drop the murder charges if he agreed to plead guilty to the drug charge.Prosecutors have dropped a murder allegation against a San Antonio drug dealer awaiting trial for the fatal shooting of a customer who tried to rip him off — instead allowing him to plead guilty to a marijuana charge.
What part of that didn't you understand?
ing idiot.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote