What no chimp reference? And I was looking forward to another wity chimp reference from you. They were so refreshing.
More more epic fail jpegs just stare into a mirror, some epic failure is bound to happen sooner or later.
Less talk, more epic fail jpegs please. K, thanks.
What no chimp reference? And I was looking forward to another wity chimp reference from you. They were so refreshing.
More more epic fail jpegs just stare into a mirror, some epic failure is bound to happen sooner or later.
Less talk, more epic fail jpegs from Chimp please. K, thanks.
What no chimp reference again? And I was looking forward to another wity chimp reference from you. They were so refreshing.
More more epic fail jpegs just stare into a mirror, some epic failure is bound to happen sooner or later.
Get the Chimp to read this to you.
hook, line, sinker.
Knew you would come back with that. I was tempted to bold the word "again" but that would have been to obvious.
You may resume looking into the mirror for an epic failure to happen.
The chimp is showing you up by being smarter and funnier than you.
I can see why you don't want to give the keyboard back to him.
A pity.![]()
Pretty sad when your go-to material involves "chimp" references over-and-over-and-over.![]()
Sadder that I'm still playing games with a ridiculous dumb .
I believe that is called masturbation. Keep that information to yourself next time.
I'm clearly calling you a dumb . I bet even the re ed chimp thinks you're a dumb for not getting that.
Well good for you. Now maybe you can just shut the up go back to your loser life. I'd ask you to quit being a tool, but (a) that would be asking to much and (b) once a tool always a tool.
(c) lol Ohio St tat scandal
(d) you're a ing idiot
(e)![]()
![]()
![]()
LOL how much money does her program make the school? How much does Les'?
Thats like saying McDonald's sets a precedent for their CEO's conduct by firing a fry cook for something.
You're comparing Mc Donalds to a university.
rofl.
You're right. McDonald's is way bigger, richer, and more important than LSU.
at making fun of a 2010 scandal. The insults about tat-gate got old in 2011, but keep them up buddy, I'm sure they are still gold material for you.
Says the guy who starts "Curse you Ronald McDonald" threads
He used McDonald's because since you are an employee he thought you could relate. That obviously was not the case. He gave you way to much credit.
Are you expecting anyone to disagree?
The lol of Ohio St football getting hit because of some silly tats hasn't expired yet.
lolololol
That's being an idiot in a stupid, joking way.Says the guy who starts "Curse you Ronald McDonald" threads![]()
You still don't get that 1 is a number greater than 0.
When I call you a dumb , I'm saying it because your intelligence is very low.
I'm being very serious here. No joke. You are dumb.
Just dumb.He used McDonald's because since you are an employee he thought you could relate. That obviously was not the case. He gave you way to much credit.
lol ohio st
Yet Tech has the same percentage of winning the Big 12 as a team on probation. Dude the tats jokes are old. Only re s like yourself think they are still funny, yet you repeatedly go to it, pretty lame.
No your just an idiot and it is fun for everyone else to joke about. I can see how you got confused.
at you twisting words around. What next another lol Ohio St/tat joke. Can't wait.
You have to stop talking to yourself in the mirror.
You serious.If you were serious you'd get back to work and finish making my Big Mac.
And there it is, for the umpteenth time.
Tech sucks regardless.
Ohio St has/had a chance to be in the le game every year in that pansy conference but got it all ed up because of tattoos.
That will be funny to everyone outside of Ohio for a long time, especially if they become like Michigan with Rich Rod.
No, your ass is swollen and you are desperate to find something that you think will make mine swell too.No your just an idiot and it is fun for everyone else to joke about. I can see how you got confused.
We can go back to talking about how you don't understand that when somebody asks for something greater than 0 that the number 1 satisfies the request.at you twisting words around. What next another lol Ohio St/tat joke. Can't wait.
I can't wait to see you tell us again how that's not correct.
Rofl dumb
but, but, you had that one good season in 2008, 2009 or whatever the one Tech was actually decent. Hold on to those memories.
Ohio State was not going to the le game last year or this year, so the tat stuff has little effect. It was a slap on the wrist.
Ohio State will not become like Michigan under RichRod.
Not really. I usually only have to go back to your previous post to find something that makes you look re ed.
at thinking only 1 satisfies the statement made. I never said 1 wasn't greater than zero. You said I said that. You are the dumb that proposed the question of 1 win being Mono's first inclination to satisfying the answer, when everyone knew that was not the case. Yes one is the first number greater than zero, however when a statement is proposed more than zero and the answer is obviously not 1 only a mother ing re would even propose one as a possible.
So since you are the person to even propose 1 as a possibility, joking or not, you are the dumb .
I'm not the one "trying" to twist words. I don't need to "twist" words to prove that you are a dumb . You do that all by yourself.
McDonalds junk talk. Neat.
Tech junk talk. Neater.
lmao Ohio St tats
"When you look at the upcoming Ohio State roster and the weapons that Meyer will have to work with, from Jordan Hall to Jake Stoneburner, and you compare them to the weapons he had during his two National Championship seasons at Florida, you almost have to think that this season's team, had there not been a postseason ban, would have contended for a le. Alas, while that goal may be unreachable this season, Meyer has the system and talent for challenge the nation in 2013. "Ohio State was not going to the le game last year or this year, so the tat stuff has little effect. It was a slap on the wrist.
http://ohiostate.rivals.com/content.asp?CID=1355820
at thinking only 1 satisfies the statement made. I never said 1 wasn't greater than zero. You said I said that. You are the dumb that proposed the question of 1 win being Mono's first inclination to satisfying the answer, when everyone knew that was not the case. Yes one is the first number greater than zero, however when a statement is proposed more than zero and the answer is obviously not 1 only a mother ing re would even propose one as a possible.
So since you are the person to even propose 1 as a possibility, joking or not, you are the dumb .
I'm not the one "trying" to twist words. I don't need to "twist" words to prove that you are a dumb . You do that all by yourself.
smh
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)