Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 83 of 83
  1. #76
    #ThankYouTD smaka's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    2,611
    Kawhi is simply more needed on our team. We don't need Hill as PG because we have mvp-style Tony and Patty, at SG we have Manu, Danny, Neal... But we needed SF and we got it in exchange for Hill. I loved him but if I stay objective, this deal was good for the Spurs.

  2. #77
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    Kawhi is simply more needed on our team. We don't need Hill as PG because we have mvp-style Tony and Patty, at SG we have Manu, Danny, Neal... But we needed SF and we got it in exchange for Hill. I loved him but if I stay objective, this deal was good for the Spurs.
    And for the Pacers, George Hill, and Kawhi Leonard. One of those very rare trades in which all parties came out as winners.

    Good for George that he is playing so well down the stretch. He outperformed his rookie contract and now is in a position to get a very lucrative long term deal from his hometown team.

  3. #78
    BOlieve manufan10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    10,210
    Kawhi is simply more needed on our team. We don't need Hill as PG because we have mvp-style Tony and Patty, at SG we have Manu, Danny, Neal... But we needed SF and we got it in exchange for Hill. I loved him but if I stay objective, this deal was good for the Spurs.
    Agreed.

    And for the Pacers, George Hill, and Kawhi Leonard. One of those very rare trades in which all parties came out as winners.

    Good for George that he is playing so well down the stretch. He outperformed his rookie contract and now is in a position to get a very lucrative long term deal from his hometown team.
    Agreed.

  4. #79
    I'm poplovin' it! TJastal's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    7,725
    I bumped the thread to bolster my own point, not the OP's. That being, George Hill's natural position is point guard, where he is most effective. That's not crazy talk, that's real talk.

    Cue the Wild Cobra "7 games ain't nothin'! Sample size too small!" .. lmao some here will never be convinced until the man is holding up the O'Brien trophy over his head.

  5. #80
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    I predicted Hill would make the all star team someday.

  6. #81
    bandwagoner fans suck ducks's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Post Count
    74,377
    Spurs miss him more on the defensive end than on the offensive end. Spurs are a currently a slow team at the guards positions with only Parker being a quick player. Against some teams, this lack of speed hurt them.
    his d in sa is overrated
    his guy beats him alot
    he does not move his feet

  7. #82
    Believe. maddnezz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    664
    You were funny! Don't worry! I loved your post! No joke, maddnezz! It was "MAD", alright!! Good stuff.
    THANKS

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •