The Thunder played good all game. In the first half, it wasn't their
defense that staggered the Spurs, it was the Spurs just playing sloppy,
trying to figure out the correct pace to run their offense. It resulted in
a few turnovers, & blocks.
But Pop nipped it in the bud, with his "nasty" speech.
& the Spurs played aggressive ball, allowing them to figure
out the pace. Jackson held down their fire-starter, and while
he held the head of the snake, the body gyrated and quivered
as it was being punctured repe ively by the Spurs' fearless lieutenant.
Even in victory, there's much to look forward to.
Do you think Danny Green is going to go 0-6 again? That's something
to doubt after seeing Danny tap into a reserve of over-looked potential
this season. He isn't the picture of consistency, but he is a fantastic
shooter.
Do you think the ice in Neal's veins will somehow melt after
performing so well in game 1? We all know the answer (but his defense
may remain lackluster)
Do you think the Spurs will procure 14 turnovers in the first half again?
Even after succeeding after adjusting to playing at the
Thunder's pace?
Do you think Parker will miss those jump shots next game, or
do you think he'll stand idly by as Ginobili carries the team alone?
Like I said before, Spurs in 5.
Reply With Quote
Not surprising that Laker fans bow down to any player that chucks the ball as much as Kobe does.
