Borderlands 2

[Cry Havoc]

ROFL You have been pathetically wrong about the PS3 everytime you bring something up and when I show you proof that clearly states otherwise you simply ignore it like you didn't even mentioned it.

By all means, show me where I've been wrong.

Bringing up the update debate and then saying is a moot point when I showed you the difference between system updates and game updates.

Be...cause your initial point was that you didn't need to update a Ps3 like a PC and therefore it was better? I know you're dense, but don't be ing disingenuous.

Agreeing that developers can squeeze something out of the PS3 after saying it was already maxed out.

No console or piece of hardware or piece of MACHINERY in the history of mankind has ever been "maxed out". There is no such thing as a 100% efficient machine, or if there it is completely out of our technological reach to achieve. The PS3 hit a wall long ago that now consists entirely of diminishing returns. You will not see any graphical leaps on the system left. It just won't happen. Therefore, for PRACTICAL PURPOSES, the system is maxed out. And has been for a long time. Using your logic, the original NES that came out in 1985 is still alive and thriving graphically, because it was never "maxed out". The fact that this needs to be explained to you is ridiculous, and every time you try to argue it with quotes from people who have a vested interest in making money from the system they are touting, you look more and more naive. No CEO or developer in gaming is going to talk about a console reaching the end of it's life, it's fiscally idiotic to do so.

And I'm the one contradicting myself.

Well, either that or you are unable to tell which is larger between 5 and 66. I don't know man, that's pretty tough to do.

And sorry about replying back, I just couldn't help myself.

Your idiocy is highly amusing, so by all means do continue to do so.

[Reck]

By all means, show me where I've been wrong.

I've personally seen system updates for my PS3 that were several gigabytes in data and took 20 minutes to download and install.

My reply to that post: Post #39

I clearly stated the difference between the two and showed you pictures of how big each updates are. There has never..and I mean never being an update up to the excess of a gigabyte's worth of content in ANY PS3 updates. EVER!

I even provided you with a direct link to the system updates.

Preposterous. The PS3 has long been completely tapped as a system. They have already maxed it out, or if they could squeeze a little more performance out of the engine it would be enormously expensive to do so. Why do you think cross-platform games look comparatively like crap on a console when compared to it's PC brethren?

Not only did you said it yourself but later on you went on to say that they can actually squeeze more out of the PS3. If that's not a contradiction then what is.

Because it's a moot point. The purpose of updates is to allow you to play games. You seem to think that Playstation's updates are nil time and much faster than PCs. I'm pointing out that it's simply not the case. Installs on PC vs Ps3 are comparable as are updating times. If anything, it's faster on PC because it's always on and therefore I get an update streamed to me at midnight instead of waiting after I turn the Ps3 on.

See my post http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post6158480

Clearly stating otherwise. Or do you need me to take a picture so I can show you.

We've established how far you off on this point. 2mb isn't enough to update a sound file in most games. Let alone a texture pack or an engine patch.

See pictures of the 5mb updates shown somewhere on this page. Nothing else to say. Pictures says all.

I never said it didn't. Most people don't leave their consoles on 24/7, though.

http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post6159003

Most consoles will never be fully tapped in their lifespan, the same as most 4 cylinder engines will never be as efficient as possible. It's possible to squeeze more out of the PS3, but it's ENORMOUSLY expensive to do so, and even then you will not come close to the horsepower of a PC game today. It's over. Every else sees this. Why can't you?

I think that about covers your takes on the PS3.

As you can see, wrong.

You went from saying the PS3 wasn't tapped or maxxed out to yes they can get more out of it.

Dont be calling people dense when you cant even keep track of what you're even saying.

[DMC]

Some games I prefer console and some I prefer PC. I have a high end PC and I've done a few things to it to make it even better, so games look and play pretty sweet. Mostly I like that I can do developer and with the single player game. It adds life to an otherwise played out game. I am not into the death fests online since the end of the open terrain engines.

For AC, I prefer console because I know the commands and my TV is 60" and I can relax on the couch. Same for NBA games, just a smoother flow. I have a Logitech wireless controller for my PC but it's just not the same, the mapping isn't that great.

[symple19]

A good ole' PC vs Console argument. Gotta love it. Not much of an argument, though

lol consoles

[Cry Havoc]

A good ole' PC vs Console argument. Gotta love it. Not much of an argument, though

lol consoles

THEY HAVE SOME LIFE LEFT!

[Reck]

THEY HAVE SOME LIFE LEFT!

Sup dude, why ya ducked my last post.

[Cry Havoc]

Sup dude, why ya ducked my last post.

Because it's pointless to argue with someone who has no clue what they are talking about. I should have realized that several pages ago like every other ing poster on this board and just started laughing at you like they did.

[Reck]

Because it's pointless to argue with someone who has no clue what they are talking about. I should have realized that several pages ago like every other ing poster on this board and just started laughing at you like they did.

Or maybe because you didnt have an answer.

Did you not say the ps3 had been maxxed out and later say the oposite? And were you not falsely saying the ps3 couldnt or didnt have a particular feature?

Yes or no questions btw.

I mean talk about being prententious. lol

[Cry Havoc]

Or maybe because you didnt have an answer.

Did you not say the ps3 had been maxxed out and later say the oposite? And were you not falsely saying the ps3 couldnt or didnt have a particular feature?

Yes or no questions btw.

I mean talk about being prententious. lol

Because it's pointless to argue with someone who has no clue what they are talking about. I should have realized that several pages ago like every other ing poster on this board and just started laughing at you like they did.

[Reck]

AKA I have no response to your previous post about me being wrong about det PS3.

[Cry Havoc]

Nope, it's closer to:

Because it's pointless to argue with someone who has no clue what they are talking about. I should have realized that several pages ago like every other ing poster on this board and just started laughing at you like they did.

[Reck]

Nope, it's closer to:

Then kindly answer the two very simple questions I asked.

Qouting your own post over and over just makes it clear you're avoiding them. Man the up.

[Cry Havoc]

Then kindly answer the two very simple questions I asked.

Qouting your own post over and over just makes it clear you're avoiding them. Man the up.

Says the guy who won't answer a single question in the past 5 pages.

Nope, it's a solid case of, "It's pointless to argue with someone who has no clue what they are talking about.".

[Reck]

Says the guy who won't answer a single question in the past 5 pages.

Nope, it's a solid case of, "It's pointless to argue with someone who has no clue what they are talking about.".

And which questions would those be? As far as I'm concerned I have responded to all your posts. If I missed a question then ask it.

I dont know why you just wont admit you were wrong about some of what you said about the PS3. You even lied.

Oh and BTW this thread is only 3 pages long.