So why argue something that was never in question?
Indeed I did
So why argue something that was never in question?
It was in question. Not arguing just passing along personal views.
I guess you did have to admit it was offensive. Good for you.
Offensive wasn't in question, hateful was.
But you felt compelled to admit it was offensive.
After acknowledging it met your criteria for being hateful.
Glad we agree on it all tbh.
Thanks for clearing it all up Chump. If you get a minute watch her interview with Piers Morgan I thought she did well defending herself.
Unless she apologized or directly addressed the letter, not interested.
From what I can gather, he ran away in a manner I can only call Darrinesque -- so yes, done as we knew him.
Maybe she should have said used the word "special" in her tweet. With that said, I got no problem with Obama or Coulter calling folks re s. Best thread the dumper of chumps started, tbh. God bless
I call people on here re s all the time, so whatever.
Speaking of re s...
Don Imus is a Relublican?
Of course not. You are a proponent of hate speech.
Ron bless.
You think this is a surprise to us?
Not really. I just don't care that Ann Coulter called somebody a re . I also don't care about Ann Coulter, because she is an attention .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)