Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 81 of 81
  1. #76
    Make a trade steal
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Post Count
    12,058
    The only over 35 yr old player the spurs should keep is Duncan. Both Manu and Jackson will be getting too much money for what they will be giving back. Their games are only going to get worse as they near 40. The Spurs are not winning any les relying on these guys as a couple of their top players so bring in some youth and a tough frontline player.

  2. #77
    Ruffy RuffnReadyOzStyle's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    24,209
    Jax is an essential component of this team, crucial for us to contend methinks. He fills all the holes the team needs - tenacious D, toughness, 3pt shooting, versatility, unselfish passing. I hope he sticks around with us for another year or three.

    If we want to make a run at Varejao we have to offer Splitter and pieces.

  3. #78
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Post Count
    216
    The only way you move Jax is if he is guarenteed to be released and will sign here again, or our season/future is completely destroyed and we enter rebuilding mode on the fly, or if it returns a big man that makes us le favorites (ie Al Jefferson, not saying its going to happen just an example)

  4. #79
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Post Count
    18,794
    We keeping him now. out 4-6 weeks. you OP and everyone who posted in this thread.

    I just finished watching the game and I am pretty pissed off too about this thread. I said earlier in the thread that our depth at SF sucks, yet no one even said jack about that. Looks like I was right. I wanted to Spurs to get another SF/PF type.

    I have no ing idea why we are carrying this many guards, bit of a joke really. We need better big man depth and also SF/PF type player depth.

    Spurs came into the season with a completely unbalanced team. Why in the do we need so many small guards on the roster?

  5. #80
    5. timvp's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Post Count
    59,905
    Tonight was a good example why Jackson is needed. When he left with injury, the Clippers proceeded to just bully the Spurs. And the Spurs never really fought back.

    Jackson gives the Spurs that bit of compe ive fiber that you can't find in a box score. It's not a coincidence Pop had to pull the soft card right before Jackson arrived and right after he went down with an injury.

    The Spurs are no longer good enough where they can win a championship on talent and chemistry alone. To do it, they'd need a whole of a lot of grit ... and Jackson has grit by the bushel.

  6. #81
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    I just finished watching the game and I am pretty pissed off too about this thread. I said earlier in the thread that our depth at SF sucks, yet no one even said jack about that. Looks like I was right. I wanted to Spurs to get another SF/PF type.

    I have no ing idea why we are carrying this many guards, bit of a joke really. We need better big man depth and also SF/PF type player depth.

    Spurs came into the season with a completely unbalanced team. Why in the do we need so many small guards on the roster?
    The front office is allergic to big men. Blatche could probably have been had for the minimum now he's helping the Nets win games.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •