Page 4 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 135
  1. #76
    Remember kobyz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    4,406
    this series is over!! i knew that even after game 1 win which was win that is all loss because how we played... Warriors dominate us, Mark Jackson has Pop's numbers, Tim and Tony playing very mediocre, Manu suck, even in game 1 when he has been called an hero it was his worst game of the season, we playing like garbage and it's not seem gonna change, look for us to get out of the playoffs very soon by the Warriors.

  2. #77
    GetalifewoodU Strategic's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Post Count
    3,931
    I really think the Spurs can control a lot of this by getting back to their offense. The "good to great" thinking was too often dissed by taking the first trey that came. Either fast break these guys to death or make them play solid D. Spurs will bounce back.

  3. #78
    Veteran Chomag's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    8,772
    Pop is just getting flat out out coached and by Mark Jackson no less. He must have scouted out Pop's stubbornness and is going right at it.

    This is the playoffs just play your best players and line up, this mad scientist crap! Going small to try to match up with the Warrior's "GAME" is plain stupid. I's like putting a gazzelle in a cage of lions.

    Was Pop just teasing us with the finally asked for line up of Splitter and Duncan playing together all season long? Spur's front court should kill this team!

    Someone posted here earlier that this is turning into a repeat of the Mavs vr Warriors 07 and you know what? I think they might be right.

    Another series on Pop's head...
    Last edited by Chomag; 05-09-2013 at 07:02 AM.

  4. #79
    Veteran John B's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    12,402
    thanks for the thoughts... your "random thoughts" pieces are a personal favorite of mine. one thing i disagree with whats going on is our propensity to match the warriors by playing small ball ourselves. we are playing RIGHT into their hands by trying to play small and run with them. the reason we have been calling Splitter the difference maker this year (in a potential matchup with OKC) is that we can impose our will with 2 bigs and force them to abandon small ball. the same can be said for the warriors. if we play Timmy and Tiago together, they'd have to account for that. would they have harrison barnes defending tiago? I would attack that pick and roll ALL day and let tiago finish. if not, we have the obvious size advantage to pick up every rebound. starting tim/tiago and playing them together for longer stretches will force them to have landry/ezeli on the floor instead. landry undersized and a pretty lousy defender, so TP would still be able to go to work against that lineup, and ezeli is so limited offensively it will really hamper what the Warriors are trying to do on offense.

    if our opponents strength is their speed/shooting and their weakness is their interior, why are we matching up with them in a way to try to rival their strength and to ignore their weakness?
    Exactly what I'm saying all day. We had the best team assist but we were not sharing the last two games. I hope it was just Duncan and Splitter not 100%, but still this is the playoffs. Suck it up and play. And I would really like us to attack the rim and make this grueling match. Check, shove and hard pick Curry. This is the playoffs. Go Spurs Go!

  5. #80
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    2,547
    Pop is just getting flat out out coached and by Mark Jackson no less. He must have scouted out Pop's stubbornness and is going right at it.

    This is the playoffs just play your best players and line up, this mad scientist crap! Going small to try to match up with the Warrior's "GAME" is plain stupid. I's like putting a gazzelle in a cage of lions.

    Was Pop just teasing us with the finally asked for line up of Splitter and Duncan playing together all season long?

    Someone posted here earlier that this is turning into a repeat of the Mavs vr Warriors 07 and you know what? I think they might be right.

    Another series on Pop's head...
    I don't think Pop's being outcoached at all. They're simply younger, faster and more athletic than us.

  6. #81
    Brazil GrandeDavid's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Post Count
    6,207
    Zero confidence in this team right now. Game 1 was awesome, but it was a fluke. I can see Golden State winning this in 5.
    I completely and totally agree with you. I will honestly be surprised if the Spurs win another game in this series. The Warriors look hungrier, better prepared, more talented and so on.

  7. #82
    Spurs Sage Russ's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    9,565
    -- I'd love for Duncan and Splitter to start Game 3 so the Spurs can at least try to get back to what made them such a successful team during the regular season. Adjust if that doesn't work but don't change your stripes from the opening tip.
    Agreed.

    But if the Spurs go out with a whimper in this series, how much money did Tiago's ankle sprain cost him?

    He's gone from hot up-and-coming young big man (about to get a big payday) to a guy who hasn't really contributed in any of his three postseasons. Of course, that isn't his fault -- injuries and lack of playing time are the culprits. Still, you have to wonder how much this could cost him.

    I still believe in Splitter and I'd love to see him wreak some havoc on that GS interior Achilles heel.

  8. #83
    Veteran weebo's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    5,512
    I would put KL on Klay and let Curry get his.

  9. #84
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Yes, the Warriors can play better. Bogut has yet to return to the level that he was at during his Milwaukee days (~14 points, ~11 rebounds) and David Lee is still out.
    I would love to see Lee back in to add a slower player.

    The change of pace and the quickness they get their jump shots off is amazing. Defensively they scramble around well but they do tire badly with the excessive minutes young guys are supposed to be able to take.

    On an aside, Jackson actually called some appropriate time outs, something missing the first game. I think we have a huge advantage with Pop. Cojo's inability to bother either Curry or Thompson has really hurt us, Kwahi is the only guy that has been a disruption on their backcourt, D. Green has in spurts. Very thin on man power we can send at their quickness and accuracy.

    i am in a quandary on if we need to slow this thing down. They are killing us with their half court offense as well as up tempo. Gonna has to trust Pop. Or hope they actually start missing a shot or two.

    Incoming! ... Dialed in.

  10. #85
    Veteran Chomag's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    8,772
    "If only Spurs made more shots and Warriors missed more shots."

    Yep! I said it!

  11. #86
    Spurs or nothing spurspokesman's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    4,760
    Our problem is over helping on scrubs and leaving the deadly shooters open. Live with a scrub beating you than hoping an assasin will miss.

  12. #87
    Born Slippy
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    3,471
    If Spurs want to get into a jump shooting match with this team they are doomed to fail there.
    Coundn't agree more.

  13. #88
    OG Spurs fan TheChillFactor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    667
    When they hit a bump, their wheels will fall off. Remember what happened to us vs. OKC last year.

  14. #89
    Believe. Spurs and Mavs fan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Post Count
    1,450
    Now we officially have a series.

    We've had a series ever since the Warriors first took a double-digit lead in Game 1 in San Antonio, in my opinion

  15. #90
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    4,829
    Quick question.. Do you think the grizzlies are going to play small next rd if they play the warriors???? Then why should we?? Spurs need easy buckets on offense..warriors are too big and athletic for us to go small and be effective on offensive end

  16. #91
    Veteran bklynspursfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Post Count
    15,095
    Crazy as it sounds, what do you guys think of Parker coming off the bench and starting Manu? This way Parker isn't abused by either Barnes or Thompson on one end, and he doesn't have to start the game on Curry. He defends Jack much better than those other 3, and granted Jack still hit some shots, but Parker made him work hard for them. I doubt it happens, but I think those matchups are better.

  17. #92
    Chunky Brazil's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    30,520
    I've got a couple of friends who, after the first-game comeback, said they were coming over and forcing me to watch tonight's game. I'm still just as down on the league as I have been, but I'll toss out a few observations:

    The Warriors clearly don't think they are going to get beaten by Tim Duncan shooting 19/20-footers from straight away, and I'm forced to agree. They're giving that shot away just about any time he wants it. He'll make some, but it's a relatively low-percentage shot without the payoff of a 3-pointer. If taking that shot was sucking a defender out, he could take it often enough to keep them honest, and pass other times. But they're staying down in the middle, and watching him shoot it. I'd just about rather see him taking 3-pointers. Actually, I'd like to see him taking some of those 12/14-footers off the glass. They might actually have to honor that shot, which would keep them a little more honest on defense.

    Before tonight, Klay Thompson was 12-39 from the 3P line in the playoffs. The Spurs need to put some good, hard playoff fouls on both him and Curry, to take them out of their rhythm and give them something to think about. (Where's Robert Horry when you need him?) It wouldn't hurt my feelings to see them commit a few more hard fouls on the floor, and a few less ticky-tack shooting fouls. And when they do commit a shooting foul, make damn sure the shot doesn't go up clean. As Charles Barkley has said on more than one occasion, "See if he can get up off the floor and make the next one." I hate to say it, but the Spurs looked soft. Tim, Tony, and Manu all three kept looking for whistles - sometimes it didn't look like even they expected the shots to fall. I've seen them do it before, and it's never a good sign. And Bonner was looking for a whistle on just about every freaking rebound. Yeah, Matty, you got pushed... push back harder. Because even if you get out of this round, Z-Bo is gonna kick your soft ass.



    The Warriors played as good as they are capable of, and the Spurs still had to throw it away to lose. Unfortunately, the Spurs played like the inexperienced team tonight. Some of the biggest examples I can remember are:

    1. At the end of the 3rd, the Spurs had closed a 19-point halftime lead down to just 8 points. Neal chucked a 3-pointer, trying to preserve a 2-for-1 opportunity. Manu got the long rebound with 27 seconds on the game clock, and a new shot clock. Manu has been around long enough to know that he should have pulled it back out and tried to get a shot right at the shot-clock buzzer. Maybe take a 6-point deficit into the 4th, but preserve the 8-point deficit as the worst case. (Assuming the Spurs could keep GS occupied for the last 3 seconds.) Instead, he threw a too-late, off-target pass to Green in the corner. Manu wanted a shot to go up, and Green didn't have much choice but to take it. That left GS enough time to make that 3-pointer at the other end as the buzzer sounded. It gave them an 11 point lead, and let them believe that they didn't have to collapse. Manu always plays high-variance ball, but that was just stupid. There's no excuse for piss-poor clock management from a team that is supposed to be so disciplined. IMO, that one play killed the Spurs' comeback and allowed GS to win the game.
    2. For most of the game, Kawhi's offense looked like a rookie who had never been to the playoffs before. He was so tight, it's a wonder he didn't break something. Everybody misses shots, but he short-armed everything about as badly as I have ever seen. If there's an explanation other than nerves, I'd love to hear it.
    3. For a critical stretch in the second half, Danny Green was giving Curry a world of on the defensive end. He tapped the ball out of his hands several times, got one steal, forced him to give the ball up, and generally kept him out of rhythm. Next thing you know, Pop's got Kawhi on Curry, and he's blowing into the paint for an easy score. I don't know what happened in the first game, but tonight he should have kept Green on him until he quit being effective. That's on Pop.
    4. The Spurs got stops, steals, and turnovers in the 4th, and squandered virtually all of them. Mostly with crappy passing, and trying to force the issue around the basket instead of kicking out and re-setting the offense. The two that really come to mind were Parker getting his own offensive rebound, and then trying to force up a shot with 4 GS players around him, and Manu getting the ball after a Danny Green block, and trying to force a fast break that just wasn't there. Those plays reeked of desperation, not the confidence of seasoned vets who believe they are the better team.


    I've always been a student of the mental aspects of the game, momentum and timing. Robert Horry knew better than anyone that there are certain points in a game, and in a series where you can put a dagger in your opponent with a big play or two. I know every made shot looks the same in the box score, but when it gets in the opponents' heads, it can count for a lot more. Right now, the Warriors are as loose as a team can be. They're playing with house money, and all the pressure is off. But it's hard for an upcoming athlete to really believe that he belongs at the top, the first time or two that he challenges. The Warriors believe they can beat the Spurs - especially now. But it's going to be a lot harder for them to see themselves actually closing them out of a 7-game series. That nothing-to-lose at ude will start to evaporate when they realize that they have everything to lose. And the basket that looks so big right now will start to shrink along with it. Believe it or not, the more they win, the harder it will get for them. As bad as the Spurs looked, the Warriors' recent collapses and near-collapses are in every one of their minds. The Spurs could still finish this thing in 5 games, if they've got the toughness to go after them. Personally (and I can't believe I'm saying this) I would put Mills on the inactive list, and let Baynes and T-Mac put a little wood on Bogut and Thompson. Get one of them to lose his cool, and the distraction would be irresistible for a lot of their young guys, IMO.
    good post

    the most frustrating part is that this game was much more winnable than game 1 but execution in the fourth has been horrible, manu after a good 3 made 2/3 bad decisions in a row that killed our hopes and in O we stopped to move the ball. fwiw I also thought Duncan's presence was hurting the team in the fourth.

    TP and the Spurs need to find a solution, GS run their offense through him and he is spending a lot of energy trying to keep up with his opponents without a lot of success or trying to contest jumpers of taller guys, as a result his energy on O is down. He usually run all over the place starting by doing the wipers on the base line but against them he doesn't have the boost to do it. He definitely needs to step up.

    Regarding physicality I agree 200%, in the third they played aggressive and D and made a lot of damage, we need more of that. They need to harass Curry and Spurs need to put an end to the layup party, if they want some layup they will have to think they will end falling hard on the floor.

    I also agree with the ones saying don't try to outplay them on their strengths we are going to loose, they have better small line ups and they are better at pushing the ball. I'd prefer loose this round by going big and slowing down the pace at least we give us a chance than trying to run faster than them.

  18. #93
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    2,617
    I remember "small ball" against Dallas. That didn't work either. Why play into the other teams strengths? No better small ball team out there than GS. Slow 'em down...don't make the same mistake we did against Dallas.

    That being said, this is the problem. Their Superstars are young and energetic. Our Superstars are older and slower. When our Superstars were young and energetic, we did to other teams...what GS is doing to us.

  19. #94
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,584
    Crazy as it sounds, what do you guys think of Parker coming off the bench and starting Manu? This way Parker isn't abused by either Barnes or Thompson on one end, and he doesn't have to start the game on Curry. He defends Jack much better than those other 3, and granted Jack still hit some shots, but Parker made him work hard for them. I doubt it happens, but I think those matchups are better.
    I was suggesting the same thing on another thread.
    So you can pair up Green on Jack with the second unit and let Parker Score his during those stretches.
    The problem is that GS plays their starters about 40 mins a game which will make the move almost pointless.

  20. #95
    Veteran bklynspursfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Post Count
    15,095
    I was suggesting the same thing on another thread.
    So you can pair up Green on Jack with the second unit and let Parker Score his during those stretches.
    The problem is that GS plays their starters about 40 mins a game which will make the move almost pointless.
    That's the same problem I thought about, but even if we're able to do it start the game and 2nd half to maybe prevent some of those easy looks they were getting, it might help keep the fans from going nuts, and keep us in the game, rather than dig ourselves in a huge hole.

  21. #96
    Spur Forever urunobili's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    14,291
    Thanks timvp.

    I lost my confidence on the team but not hope

  22. #97
    PRICELESS SPURS FAN polandprzem's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Post Count
    16,433
    I remember back in a days when the spurs got demolished by the Suns !


    All in all Spurs are in deep . And they need to realize this is for real. Warriors are way better team then they expected. Much more difficult matchup then the Lakers. Got damn level up your intensity or go fishing.

    .

    At the end spurs gave up totally. No guts whatsoever

  23. #98
    Not Koolaid_Man Homeland Security's Avatar
    My Team
    Washington Wizards
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    1,233
    This is the fourth season in a row that opposing teams have been torching the Spurs from the perimeter, and Spurs fans have been calling it a fluke. No, it's not a fluke. It's that the Spurs are a ty perimeter defensive team in the playoffs. Klay Thompson was in his own zip code on most of those first-half shots. Any decent shooter who doesn't choke is going to get in a rhythm and hit those shots.

    Defending Golden State is not that complicated; they aren't really built for the postseason. Basically just don't give them a whole bunch of wide-open looks from 3 and you'll keep them under control. But if they get enough of a stretch of open shots to get into rhythm, then they'll start hitting the contested ones too. Memphis certainly will be able to slow down GS, and OKC probably has enough defensive chops to get it done too. That the Spurs can't get it done has nothing to do with Curry and Thompson playing the most superest awesomest any backcourt has ever played in the histories of times like timvp claims. The common factor in all these "fluky" great shooting performances is that they come against the Spurs. The most likely inference is that the Spurs' perenially inept perimeter defense in the playoffs is the cause of the torrid shooting.

    Furthermore, the Spurs' "system" is predicated on the idea that the Spurs will out-execute their opponents. In Game 1, GS was the superior team for 44 minutes but then threw it away down the stretch once Thompson fouled out. They are a young team and that happens. But SA did not have the wherewithal to go for the throat in Game 2, so GS is getting the opportunity to learn how to close out games. Down the stretch in Game 2, you saw the Spurs pressing and making bad decisions. I believe this is because mentally the Spurs know they are playing a superior team that they aren't going to beat unless they get lucky. The "system" breaks down in the playoffs because any competent coach (i.e. not a complete ing idiot like Mike D'Antoni) over the course of a series is going to be able to make adjustments to attack the weak points in the "system."

    You need superior talent to win a championship. The feeling you get seeing what seems like an endless wave after wave of young talent coming in the game for Golden State isn't going away. But it's not because that talent is so overwhelming; in the next series GS won't look like world-beaters anymore, because they really aren't. It's that the Spurs just aren't that talented. The "system" delivers regular-season wins, especially early in the year while other teams are feeling themselves out and SA can capitalize on the advantage conferred by its "corporate knowledge." But eventually many, many other teams catch up with, and ultimately pass, the Spurs. The Warriors are one of them. Among teams that lost in the first round, Houston and Denver also would have beaten the Spurs. The Clippers probably wouldn't have, because Vinny Del Negro is a complete ing idiot who wouldn't have been able to make the right adjustments.

  24. #99
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    6,202
    Lots of optimism on this board. The way I see it - GS has thoroughly outplayed Spurs except for the 4th quarter of game 1. Spurs are not going to win with 2 of their best players (Splitter and Diaw) together playing only 17 minutes total in a game. I hate that Pop tries to match down with them. Spurs are not going to beat them at their own game. It's madness. Hoping that Curry and Thompson won't continue to shoot like this is wishful thinking. The role players will play better in front of their own crowd. Lay the wood on them - foul hard - put them in the bonus early and hack-a-Bogut. This will get him off the court and allow Parker to penetrate. Then the offense will operate as it usually does. This iso ball won't work. Spurs were #1 in assists all season - now they have less assists than GS.

  25. #100
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    That dude from Prometheus is a pretty damn good shooter.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •