Reply With Quote
Where did planes come into this?
and lol @ democracy in these countries full of fanatics... it's a different world out there...
Where did planes come into this?
Ok....they're going to raid the ship via small boats, climb up there, and take the boat hostage....then they're gonna blow it up.
Happy?
man...just stop....know when to say when on the constant schtick.
It's not a shtick in this case. We're talking about this ship.
Where's the ladder?
On the other side of the boat.It's not a shtick in this case.
Where's the ladder?
Goodnight.
Notice how much slower this ship is moving compared to a plane. If a .50 cal BMG can take out a plane from 4 miles away, a person armed with said weapon could surely hit a boats fuel tank from where this same picture was taken. Seriously, it's a .50 ing cal BMG!It's not a shtick in this case. We're talking about this ship.
Where's the ladder?
You'll have to educate us on the fuel tanks of this ship. Where are they? Is this ship built any differently from an airplane?
Also, we were talking about boarding and hijacking the ship.
Try to keep up.
And they just allow small boats to run willy-nilly in the canal?
Before we go further you'll need to research the .50 cal BMG as I wouldn't need to be willy dillying on a boat dumbass, I'd be 4 miles away.
Well, considering this was done with a shaped charge right next to a ship and didn't sink it, I'm going to conclude the gun your bragging about might have a difficult time exploding a cargo ship's fuel tanks from four miles away.
Shaped chargeWell, considering this was done with a shaped charge right next to a ship and didn't sink it, I'm going to conclude the gun your bragging about might have a difficult time exploding a cargo ship's fuel tanks from four miles away.
Read up on the .50 cal BMG.
Give me a link. Make sure you include it's cargo ship exploding capabilities.Shaped charge
Read up on the .50 cal BMG.
Your claim is that gun can do more damage at four miles than 700 pounds of explosives point blank. I'd love to read the supporting do ents.
It's not my claim.
Your claim is you could blow up the fuel tanks of the pictured container ship from four miles away, is it not?
Boutons, never gave Dubya or his buddies a pass on that that happened in the past. This is 2013 and Obama is president, not Bush. This cluster in Egypt is all Obama. I just laugh at Obama drinkers that try to defend him on this . It's pathetic. Your guy sucks ass on foreign policy just as much if not more than Bush. When it comes to foreign policy, Obama is Bush on steroids. True liberals should be furious at their guy Obama.
What would you have done with Egypt from 2009 to today?
Leave them the alone, close all embassies and consulates in Egypt, and cut all foreign aid to them. em'.
In 2009?
Yeah, they don't need our money. Leave them alone and let them just kill each other. That's what America should do in a lot of places especially the Middle East. Leave them alone. Let them be barbarians and kill each other. Stay the out of it.
Just leave it to whoever wants it? China? Russia?
Sure, why not?
oil. Oil is bad according to Al Gore and climate change enthusiasts so we don't need Egypt and the rest of the Middle East.
Is it bad according to you?
Yes, you could say it's bad.
I didn't ask what I could say.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
