Seeing as this thread has become a battle of Manu s vs realists, I might as well join the battle. Even though Stephen Jackson’s performance during the regular season is ty and he is prone to turnovers, there is no way in that Stak5 would have turned the ball over 8 times in Games 6. There is no way in that Stephen Jackson would have shot horribly from the three point line as Manu did during the NBA Finals. Stak lives to perform in the playoffs. Every playoff team that he’s played for, he has always contributed when it counts. the regular season. I see Hater with the goods as usual. Of course the Spurs would have won their 5th championship if Manu didn’t dress up for Game 6. Heck, I believe that Timmy would have won his 5th ring had Manu torn his ACL in Game 1 of the NBA Finals. Having Stephen Jackson playing Manu’s minutes would have been enough to win it all.
Spurs FO are the only ones dumb enough to overpay a washed up drunkin SG. If Manu would have signed with another team, it would have been for nothing more than the veteran's minimum.

, looks who's talking. A Manu that has blind faith in a 36 year old washed up SG. Yes you are a Manu because as soon as hater brought up Manu into the conversation, you were quick to come to the rescue.
Did you not read his interview? The man is still in denial. He actually believes that just being healthy is good enough for him to get his game back. He doesn’t have any aspirations to improve his 3pt FG% nor does he feel need to avenge his ty performance in the NBA Finals.
We all saw that Manu was physically healthy during the NBA Finals, he said it himself during interviews. Sadly, being in good health will not be enough for Manu. He NEEDS to adjust his game. He needs to practice and improve his shooting during the offseason. I doubt he will or that he is doing anything to adjust his game. God damn I wish he would have retired. That SOB is stubborn like a mule.