Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 92 of 92
  1. #76
    The cat won symple19's Avatar
    My Team
    San Francisco 49ers
    Post Count
    16,246
    So...the Saints have one win against a winning team on the road and one more win against a winning team than the Seahawks do and they're overwhelmingly better than the Seahawks? I'm not sold on that and perhaps the upcoming MNF will go a ways to prove who is the better team. There's a ton of games to go and the 2nd half will definitely show what the Hawks are in comparison to some of the other top teams in the NFC are. I would scoff at the idea that you think the Packers would beat the Hawks with that horrid of a defense that gave up wins to the hapless Cade McNown and tied with Christian Ponder. But, there is too much to play for to really get a read on what's going to happen.
    There is a very simple counter-argument to all of this ^

    Drew Brees/Aaron Rodgers>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Russel Wilson

    Aaron Rodgers didn't play against the Bears or the Vikes(2nd time)

    If Seattle doesn't get home field, it will be a choke job. They have a one game lead with a more favorable remaining schedule, Saints, @Niners and Arizona, while New Orleans has the Monday nighter plus a home/home with the Panthers. Without home field there is no way the Seahawks get to the SB, and I don't think they could beat either NO or GB in the NFCCG even if they are in Seattle.

  2. #77
    you're my sweetie pie Cuppycake Gumdrop's Avatar
    Post Count
    1,217
    Carolina-NE super bowl rematch tbh

  3. #78
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    St. Louis Rams
    Post Count
    10,168
    can you two get a room plz?
    Nice Win for yo Jags, Bump!

  4. #79
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    St. Louis Rams
    Post Count
    10,168
    There is a very simple counter-argument to all of this ^

    Drew Brees/Aaron Rodgers>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Russel Wilson

    Aaron Rodgers didn't play against the Bears or the Vikes(2nd time)
    If Seattle doesn't get home field, it will be a choke job. They have a one game lead with a more favorable remaining schedule, Saints, @Niners and Arizona, while New Orleans has the Monday nighter plus a home/home with the Panthers. Without home field there is no way the Seahawks get to the SB, and I don't think they could beat either NO or GB in the NFCCG even if they are in Seattle.
    That much better? If it were the NBA Jam equivalency of the game...then you can make that argument. However it isn't and the team comparison is a lot closer than it is apart. With that D the Packers would get beat at the Clink. We'll see Monday how it goes down between Seattle and N.O. that will be the barometer at this point.

  5. #80
    hope and change
    Post Count
    5,749
    Chargers. just need to upgrade that secondary with some guys off the street

  6. #81
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    Seahawks easily. They are head and shoulders above everyone else in the league.

  7. #82
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    St. Louis Rams
    Post Count
    10,168
    Seahawks easily. They are head and shoulders above everyone else in the league.
    Aw f@#k tlong is a Seahawk fan...we doomed now.

  8. #83
    Veteran N0 LyF3 ScRuB's Avatar
    My Team
    Carolina Panthers
    Post Count
    10,789
    Seahawks easily. They are head and shoulders above everyone else in the league.
    please you won by 5 against us from a BS fumble and that was WAY before we peaked

  9. #84
    License to Lillard tlongII's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    28,727
    please you won by 5 against us from a BS fumble and that was WAY before we peaked
    We got a new guy now. Name is Percy Harvin. You may have heard of him before.

  10. #85
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    St. Louis Rams
    Post Count
    10,168
    please you won by 5 against us from a BS fumble and that was WAY before we peaked
    ...and you barely beat the 49ers by 1 and the moribund Dolphins on a lucky 4th down conversion, what's your point? That's peaking? This has a ton more left to go before you should anoint anyone.

  11. #86
    CDs Nuts. resistanze's Avatar
    My Team
    Green Bay Packers
    Post Count
    23,869
    RG3

  12. #87
    on instagram, str8 flexin DUNCANownsKOBE's Avatar
    My Team
    New England Patriots
    Post Count
    19,109
    Aw f@#k tlong is a Seahawk fan...we doomed now.
    Tlong is the only Seahawks fan on this site who didn't suddenly discover the NFL forum after the Seahawks were considered favorites in the NFC

  13. #88
    Veteran N0 LyF3 ScRuB's Avatar
    My Team
    Carolina Panthers
    Post Count
    10,789
    We got a new guy now. Name is Percy Harvin. You may have heard of him before.
    and we have Jonathan Stewart.. idk if you were born yet... but Double Trouble is the only running back pair to rush for 1100 yards a piece in history

  14. #89
    ex Hornets78 Pelicans78's Avatar
    My Team
    New Orleans Saints
    Post Count
    15,822
    and we have Jonathan Stewart.. idk if you were born yet... but Double Trouble is the only running back pair to rush for 1100 yards a piece in history
    Harvin has more impact than Stewart. Quit being a homer all the time. Makes you look biased.

  15. #90
    BUSsell Will Spur-Addict's Avatar
    My Team
    Seattle Seahawks
    Post Count
    10,935
    can you two get a room plz?
    Bump, why you treat me dat wayz?

  16. #91
    My Favorite Faded Fantasy The Gemini Method's Avatar
    My Team
    St. Louis Rams
    Post Count
    10,168
    Tlong is the only Seahawks fan on this site who didn't suddenly discover the NFL forum after the Seahawks were considered favorites in the NFC
    Hey I was here last year...maybe not as a Seahawk backer (I admit bandwagonning) but until L.A. gets a team, I will root for the Hawks to win a le.

  17. #92
    no it's not. go look at the reply.

    when you said that someone should be bumped that means they should be bumped from the list.

    if you are trying to say that someone should be higher, then you say either "boosted" or "pushed" ... you don't say "Brees should be bumped from the list".
    you would probably wanna say "bumped up a spot or two", not just "bumped" with no context.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •