sexual attraction is all chemical interactions in the brain.http://youtu.be/TKDFsLi2oBk If you molest a little boy, you leave the pleasure in-printed in his brain, therefore possibly screwing up his neurological development. That molestation sometimes becomes an addiction. sexuality is in evil, but it is a product of our fallen sinful nature. The causes of it are right in our face but sometimes we don't want to see the truth. And also pollution that's causing a of mutations within our genes, not just on people but I'm hearing also on animals as well. http://www.desireerover.nl/wp-conten...eo-Colborn.pdf
Turns out the dude came out to his parents a year ago. This conflict was because they didn't want him packing fudge under their roof.
Is there a human being that is afraid of sexuals? This guy filming this just screams attention . Why else would he record his gayness?
Stop, sweetie
omg thats jus krazy
Why would people do a lot of the dumb people do? It may or may not be a choice but that is really a terrible argument. And when people say it is a choice they don't mean an active, thought-out choice.
The disillusioned need to be different/stand out. Easy acceptance from others seeking the same "individualism"
Being sexual is only partly due to gay gene, research finds
Study finds that while gay men share similar genetic make-up, it only accounts for 40 per cent.
By Sarah Knapton, Science Correspondent
11:59PM GMT 13 Feb 2014
http://http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sc...rch-finds.html
sexuality is only partly genetic with sexuality mostly based on environmental and social factors, scientists believe.
A study found that, while gay men shared similar genetic make-up, it only accounted for 40 per cent of the chance of a man being sexual.
But scientists say it could still be possible to develop a test to find out if a baby was more likely to be gay.
In the most comprehensive study of its kind, Dr Michael Bailey, of Northwestern University, has been studying 400 sets of twins to determine if some men are genetically predisposed to being gay.
The study found that gay men shared genetic signatures on part of the X chromosome - Xq28.
Dr Bailey said: “Sexual orientation has nothing to do with choice. Our findings suggest there may be genes at play – we found evidence for two sets that affect whether a man is gay or straight.
“But it is not completely determinative; there are certainly other environmental factors involved. “The study shows that there are genes involved in male sexual orientation.
“Although this could one day lead to a pre-natal test for male sexual orientation, it would not be very accurate, as there are other factors that can influence the outcome.”
Dr Alan Sanders, associate Professor of Psychiatry at Northwestern University, who led the study said that it was it was an 'oversimplification’ to suggest there was a 'gay gene.’
“We don’t think genetics is the whole story. It’s not. We have a gene that contributes to sexuality but you could say it is linked to heterosexuality. It is the variation.”
The study builds on work by Dr Dean Hamer from the US National Cancer Ins ute in 1993 who also found an area of the x chromosome that he believed was linked to male sexual orientation.
Last year Canadian scientists found that the more older male siblings a man has, the greater change he will be gay.
They believe that the immune response produced by a pregnant mother increases with each son, increasing the odds of producing more feminine traits in the developing brain of the foetus.
Each older brother raised the odds that a man was sexual by one third.
Researchers at the University of California believe that sexuality can be explained by the presence of epi-marks — temporary switches that control how our genes are expressed during gestation and after birth.
Daryl Bem, a social psychologist at Cornell University, has suggested that the influence of biological factors on sexual orientation may be mediated by experiences in childhood. A child’s temperament predisposes the child to prefer certain activities over others.
Interestingly no similar genes have been discovered which influence female sexuality.
“No-body has found something like this in women,” he added.
Dr Bailey said environmental factors were likely to have the biggest impact on sexuality.
He added: “Don’t confuse “environmental” with “socially acquired.” Environment means anything that is not in our DNA at birth, and that includes a lot of stuff that is not social.”
Richard Lane, of Stonewall, said that while studies into the origins of sexuality have yet to produce firm evidence, they do to point to a biological root.
He said: 'The thing that’s consistent across all of them is that they all point to sexual orientation being something fundamental to a person rather than the lifestyle choice some opponents of equality repeatedly suggest.’
i basically weeded out the key points of the article. like i said earlier in repsonse to your post, there isn't a definitive gay gene. if it was purely genetic, it would have been wiped off years ago.
that being said, as the article mentions, it is not a dichotomy between genetic and choice. just because it isn't genetic doesn't mean it is a choice.
sexual Behavior Largely Shaped By Genetics And Random Environmental Factors
Date: June 30, 2008
Source: Queen Mary, University of London
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0628205430.htm
sexual behaviour is largely shaped by genetics and random environmental factors, according to findings from the world's largest study of twins.
Writing in the scientific journal Archives of Sexual Behavior, researchers from Queen Mary's School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, and Karolinska Ins utet in Stockholm report that genetics and environmental factors (which are specific to an individual, and may include biological processes such as different hormone exposure in the womb), are important determinants of sexual behaviour.
Dr Qazi Rahman, study co-author and a leading scientist on human sexual orientation, explains: "This study puts cold water on any concerns that we are looking for a single 'gay gene' or a single environmental variable which could be used to 'select out' sexuality - the factors which influence sexual orientation are complex. And we are not simply talking about sexuality here - heterosexual behaviour is also influenced by a mixture of genetic and environmental factors.
The team led by Dr Niklas Långström at Karolinska Ins utet conducted the first truly population-based survey of all adult (20-47 years old) twins in Sweden. Studies of identical twins and non-identical, or fraternal, twins are often used to untangle the genetic and environmental factors responsible for a trait. While identical twins share all of their genes and their entire environment, fraternal twins share only half of their genes and their entire environment. Therefore, greater similarity in a trait between identical twins compared to fraternal twins shows that genetic factors are partly responsible for the trait.
This study looked at 3,826 same-gender twin pairs (7,652 individuals), who were asked about the total numbers of opposite sex and same sex partners they had ever had. The findings showed that 35 per cent of the differences between men in same-sex behaviour (that is, that some men have no same sex partners, and some have one or more) is accounted for by genetics.
Rahman explains: "Overall, genetics accounted for around 35 per cent of the differences between men in sexual behaviour and other individual-specific environmental factors (that is, not societal at udes, family or parenting which are shared by twins) accounted for around 64 per cent. In other words, men become gay or straight because of different developmental pathways, not just one pathway."
For women, genetics explained roughly 18 per cent of the variation in same-sex behaviour, non-shared environment roughly 64 per cent and shared factors, or the family environment, explained 16 per cent.
The study shows that genetic influences are important but modest, and that non-shared environmental factors, which may include factors operating during foetal development, dominate. Importantly, heredity had roughly the same influence as shared environmental factors in women, whereas the latter had no impact on sexual behaviour in men.
Dr Rahman adds: "The study is not without its limitations - we used a behavioural measure of sexual orientation which might be ok to use for men (men's psychological orientation, sexual behaviour, and sexual responses are highly related) but less so for women (who show a clearer separation between these elements of sexuality). Despite this, our study provides the most unbiased estimates presented so far of genetic and non-genetic contributions to sexual orientation."
Last edited by xmas1997; 09-01-2014 at 03:48 PM.
Thanks, I am just trying to understand.
You having recently graduated would be privy to the latest knowledge.
Exactly, ing brainwashed dumb .
It's not a choice bro. Who in their right mind would choose to be ridiculed and hated for it? Who in their right mind would like to have in his ass?
exactly
lol wut?
an actual gay guyWho in their right mind would like to have in his ass?
Yeah, a guy that doesn't have a choice. Who would rather have a in his ass than his on a warm, soft, wet pussy? That's all I'm saying, tbh.exactly
lol wut?
an actual gay guy
Saying that you're born gay is a weak copout. I was born with the fatness but I choose to eat junk food. I could step up and have self control anytime. And if being gay is normal then aren't gay people devaluing themselves with the born this way bull ? Who cares? At the end of the day, you like what you like. If you are a gay guy, you suck because you like it and it makes you hard. Plain and simple.
How does one propagate if one only has sex with their same gender?
They are on the road to extinction IMHO.
Receiving and sucking is a choice. Lol science making up again.
Could any of you decide you love tomorrow?
Do you enjoy Tyler Perry movies and shows?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
