TRILL RIGHT HERE
![]()
Really?
But Im an old I know more!!!
TRILL RIGHT HERE
![]()
Just putting you take in perspective.
As some have stated Duncan>Robinson>Gervin>Manu=Parker
![]()
Putting one of the best backcourts of all time behind a man who won nothing. Yall make fun of Rockets esp harden etc being in the playoffs bbbut when its Gervin your vaginas bleed![]()
Manu is pretty safely ahead of Parker. There's really no argument for Parker outside of him giving you far more games and minutes than Manu. Manu is so much better on a per-minute basis though.
what is this garbage, tbh?..
So the first person on Earth who probably just scratched
his balls till he died means more than the people who actually did something to improve this place?
![]()
That's actually a tough one. I generally take forwards (or tall shooting guards) over PGs, but I generally prefer modern players over pre-1980 players. In this case, I think Gervin's game could hold up in today's game, and his body has the potential to be conditioned by today's standards. I give the nod to Gervin, arguably a top 5 all-time shooting guard in his prime.
^
LMAOL
College teams nowadays would probably beat the Gervin spurs by 30...Just awful.
college is a given, tbh..
I'd say it's a toss-up between NBA players of that era vs. modern day WNBA players IMO..
Look at that Gervin mixtape I posted a few posts above..compare it to this:
Bill Russell would be a skinnier DeJuan Blair in today's league tbh
Russel wouldn't even make our highschool team.
Russell was defensive-minded and a good passer, though..
Blair is an underrated passer, but his defensive IQ is historically bad IMO..
If I'm being generous and accepting that some of his traits could translate to today's game(ignoring his mostly White American compe ion, lack of opposing teams, ty FG% for a big man and stacked team), Russell would be Amir Johnson in today's game..
thanks
interesting... lots of white folk in that vid...
Jerry West = Kirk Hinrich, yes?
We're doing hypothetical individual player comparisons. If Gervin was 25 years old today and lived a 21st century life with 21st century training, I have no reason to believe he wouldn't be equally as effective as he was in 1977 (which is to say, very).
Admitting the margin of error in you assessments is the difference between Dirk and Bonner![]()
^^ Damn, , just take the L..
You quoted my post, left, returned an hour later and quoted the same post with a second reply..
It's not a big deal, every person is en led to their own opinion..so, I can respect yours, although it's a stretch IMO..it's evident that you're very biased towards certain players, but that's cool, I appreciate your fanaticism for your team..not everybody can be objective.. , even I'm biased sometimes, I admit..
This was exactly the point I tried to make earlier. When comparing players of different eras you have to normalize for context.
I figure you'd stop but you didn't tbh. Just not sure how you can trust any of you player assessment if the margin of error is so large.
He'd have a shot at beating Chandler Parsons in 1-on-1.
Thats not exactly true. Some of the credit goes to Green, and Splitter and Duncan not playing like he was 50 like he did against the Griz in the 11 postseason. Our defense went from average to elite in the span of a season and has stayed that way for the 3rd straight season.
^ And Diaw.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)