Repeal the Police Bill of Rights and Appoint a Panel to Prosecute Law Enforcement

[TheSanityAnnex]

And you called me a blowhard.

I'm a trend setter.
I set trends.

In your own words explain what I mean regarding the conflict of interest with the cops DA handling the prosecution. Then in your own words explain how the witness statements have anything to do with that.

In your own words explain how it has anything to do with the additional rights granted cops as opposed to the rest of us. Can you in any way demonstrate that you understand what I am talking about?

I have corresponded with you for a bout a year now and I have a pretty good feel for the level of your capacity. I can tell you don't really grasp what I am saying. So you can pipe in when I am arguing with other people but you still are only at that capacity.

ANd on a final note every time I comment on your lack of critical thinking. IT is always done with a specific example of a critical thinking failure on your part. You have issues identifying key words and ideas and are largely ignorant in how to compare, contrast, qualify, quantify, or otherwise evaluate them. You tend to fixate on stupid themes and go to questionable sources to reaffirm your worldview. You do a very poor job thinking for yourself.

I've only wanted to discuss the witness statements with you so I don't need to address any conflict of interest McColluch may or may not have had.

Have you had a chance to read the witness statements yet so we can discuss Mike Brown not having his hands up surrendering as you claimed and charging Wilson as you claimed he was too fat to do.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I've only wanted to discuss the witness statements with you so I don't need to address any conflict of interest McColluch may or may not have had.

Have you had a chance to read the witness statements yet so we can discuss Mike Brown not having his hands up surrendering as you claimed and charging Wilson as you claimed he was too fat to do.

I see no point in discussing the witness statements either. I don't agree with your assessment but I am not arguing with a fool.

Remember how I talk about how you get butthurt when I won't let you control the narrative? You're doing it again, fool.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I know! You should make another thread to call me out about it.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I see no point in discussing the witness statements either. I don't agree with your assessment but I am not arguing with a fool.

Remember how I talk about how you get butthurt when I won't let you control the narrative? You're doing it again, fool.

Why do you see no point in discussing the witness statements?

[rogues]

What ing annihilation in this thread..

[Wild Cobra]

I'm a trend setter.
I set trends.

OMG....

Do you seriously think that all the dingleberry's you drop are trend setting?

LOL...

LOL...

LOL..

JI just can't copnatin my laughter.

LOL...

LOL...

LOL...

[Wild Cobra]

So anyway. Seems that WC, TSA, nor anyone else wants to argue the OP while Teysha and others have supported the notion. That is about as close to board consensus as we will see on an issue.

Well, excuse me for not understanding how the protections stated in the OP would have stopped a police officer from abusing his authority if he was one to do so.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Well, excuse me for not understanding how the protections stated in the OP would have stopped a police officer from abusing his authority if he was one to do so.

You not understanding is not the standard. You are demonstrably incapable of understanding many things. I remember your chart to model the behavior of the ocean and of course your not understanding the properties of capacitors and flywheels, dimwit.

This is also a red herring. Equal protection and conflict of interest (re:corruption) are what they are.

Cops have special rights to a limited investigation that the rest of the citizenry does not enjoy. The district attorney prosecuting people that he uses as witnesses and works with in investigations amongst other things is an inherent conflict of interest. I don't need to meet your arbitrary standard of what you cannot figure out. I will say that it is quite revealing of your intellect that you cannot fathom how such things could lead to abuse of power.

I bet you think the King verdict in April 1992 was valid too. Same system same abuses.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You not understanding is not the standard. You are demonstrably incapable of understanding many things. I remember your chart to model the behavior of the ocean and of course your not understanding the properties of capacitors and flywheels, dimwit.

This is also a red herring. Equal protection and conflict of interest (re:corruption) are what they are.

Cops have special rights to a limited investigation that the rest of the citizenry does not enjoy. The district attorney prosecuting people that he uses as witnesses and works with in investigations amongst other things is an inherent conflict of interest. I don't need to meet your arbitrary standard of what you cannot figure out. I will say that it is quite revealing of your intellect that you cannot fathom how such things could lead to abuse of power.

I bet you think the King verdict in April 1992 was valid too. Same system same abuses.

For a month straight all you talked about was the contractors witness statements, why do you not see the point in discussing all of the other witness statements that have been released?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

For a month straight all you talked about was the contractors witness statements, why do you not see the point in discussing all of the other witness statements that have been released?

I ignored that discussion for the majority of the time. I avoided this board mostly up until a few weeks ago when the bannings happened.

I told you before what my position is and until you show how witnesses in a corrupted GJ hearing makes the prosecutor not have used Wilson specifically as his witness in other casws as well as many other conflicts of interest then let me know. The investigation was run by his coworkers and friends.

Additionally point me to the non-law enforcement defendant that dictate time, place, disclosure, and all the other things listed in the OP that Wilson enjoyed in the investigation of his homicide.

Until you do that, I am not going to bother wasting my time with your simpleminded interpretations of events.

[boutons_deux]

[spurraider21]

oh look a comic

[TheSanityAnnex]

I ignored that discussion for the majority of the time. I avoided this board mostly up until a few weeks ago when the bannings happened.

I told you before what my position is and until you show how witnesses in a corrupted GJ hearing makes the prosecutor not have used Wilson specifically as his witness in other casws as well as many other conflicts of interest then let me know. The investigation was run by his coworkers and friends.

Additionally point me to the non-law enforcement defendant that dictate time, place, disclosure, and all the other things listed in the OP that Wilson enjoyed in the investigation of his homicide.

Until you do that, I am not going to bother wasting my time with your simpleminded interpretations of events.

You'll need to clarify the bolded before I can try to answer that, it makes no ing sense in its current form.

You keep trying to change the subject over to the McColluch and the conflict of interest when I've clearly said I'd like to discuss the multiple witness statements that directly contradict everything you claimed. Why do you refuse to discuss the witness statements? Straight answer this time please.

[boutons_deux]

TSA pimping the TOTAL KANGAROO COURT FARCE of a the trial of Brown, aka Wilson's defense, aka Ferguson Grand Jury (in name only)

[TheSanityAnnex]

TSA pimping the TOTAL KANGAROO COURT FARCE of a the trial of Brown, aka Wilson's defense, aka Ferguson Grand Jury (in name only)

You failed to answer so I'll ask again.

You said Wilson was coached for weeks and ing lying, were the African American witnesses who testified and supported Wilson's account coached and lying as well yes or no?

[boutons_deux]

You failed to answer so I'll ask again.

You said Wilson was coached for weeks and ing lying, were the African American witnesses who testified and supported Wilson's account coached and lying as well yes or no?

I don't know, now GFY

If the prosecutor had not worked as a POLICE EXONERATOR, we'd get to see if under severe cross-examination IN A REAL COURT if any of the testimony would be allowed to stand.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I don't know, now GFY

you do know you are just too much of a coward to admit you were duped by the media.

If the prosecutor had not worked a POLICE EXONERATOR, we'd get to see if under severe cross-examination IN A REAL COURT if any of the testimony would be allowed to stand.

we know the hands up don't shoot testimonies would be thrown out.

[boutons_deux]

Cop Mistakes Pill Bottle for Gun and Another Black Man Dies


http://www.alternet.org/civil-libert...black-man-dies

oops, sorry, just doing what my training and my police culture told me to do: if it's a n!gg@, SHOOT!

[TheSanityAnnex]

Cop Mistakes Pill Bottle for Gun and Another Black Man Dies


http://www.alternet.org/civil-libert...black-man-dies

oops, sorry, just doing what my training and my police culture told me to do: if it's a n!gg@, SHOOT!

The butt of every handgun is pretty much the exact same size/shape as a pill bottle, the lawyer is an idiot.

“If the officer felt a pill bottle and believed it was a butt of a handgun, it calls into question his competence because I don’t know anyone who can mistake a plastic bottle for a butt of a gun. How much larger is a gun than a pill bottle?”

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You failed to answer so I'll ask again.

You said Wilson was coached for weeks and ing lying, were the African American witnesses who testified and supported Wilson's account coached and lying as well yes or no?

You don't understand what he is getting at when he says Kangaroo Court nor what I am saying when talking about the prosecutor using Wilson as state's witness repeatedly for his cases is a conflict of interest nor how a prosecutors office and police force work together because of the nature of law enforcement creates a natural a conflict of interest when turned on itself.

Aristotle said "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." You want to talk about witness statements that match your confirmation bias because your inferiority is showing.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You don't understand what he is getting at when he says Kangaroo Court nor what I am saying when talking about the prosecutor using Wilson as state's witness repeatedly for his cases is a conflict of interest nor how a prosecutors office and police force work together because of the nature of law enforcement creates a natural a conflict of interest when turned on itself.

Aristotle said "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." You want to talk about witness statements that match your confirmation bias because your inferiority is showing.

I understand what both of you are getting at and have stated that is a different topic. I want to discuss the witness statements because they match the forensic evidence and were not statements made following a forced and fabricated narrative.

Again, why do you refuse to discuss the witness statements? Can you finally admit that "hands up don't shoot" was a lie? Can you finally admit that Mike Brown did in fact charge Wilson?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I understand what both of you are getting at and have stated that is a different topic. I want to discuss the witness statements because they match the forensic evidence and were not statements made following a forced and fabricated narrative.

Again, why do you refuse to discuss the witness statements? Can you finally admit that "hands up don't shoot" was a lie? Can you finally admit that Mike Brown did in fact charge Wilson?

You don't seem to grasp how a hearing being corrupt subsumes what you want to talk about either. This isn't a different subject as it pertains to the environment of your testimonies, arguments, and evidence. They are intrinsically linked. You need to work on your critical thinking skills.

I know you want to dismiss the witnesses that the prosecutor told you to and argue on the merits of how he ran the proceedings. I give you and your line of thinking no credence.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You don't seem to grasp how a hearing being corrupt subsumes what you want to talk about either. This isn't a different subject as it pertains to the environment of your testimonies, arguments, and evidence. They are intrinsically linked. You need to work on your critical thinking skills.

I know you want to dismiss the witnesses that the prosecutor told you to and argue on the merits of how he ran the proceedings. I give you and your line of thinking no credence.

What will be your excuse when the Federal investigation comes to the same conclusion?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

What will be your excuse when the Federal investigation comes to the same conclusion?

same conclusion

One is a civil rights investigation. The other is a homicide investigation.

critical thinking

[TheSanityAnnex]

Both are/were investigating a justifiable use of lethal force