Reply With Quote
I don't know either, why don't you read the ing articles yourself and let us know where Ruentzel says that black violence is justified through white privilege, since that's the delicious irony you created a thread about.
I'd say American Thinker just grossly misrepresented, or more succinctly, lied.
There certainly isn't the kind of stuff you were programmed to think he wrote.
I don't know either, why don't you read the ing articles yourself and let us know where Ruentzel says that black violence is justified through white privilege, since that's the delicious irony you created a thread about.
Here's a Chumpesque question for you,
Did the SPLC say Ruenzel wrote for them about white privilege or not?
Got to find them to read them. I'm trying.
I don't know either, why don't you read the ing articles yourself and let us know where Ruentzel says that black violence is justified through white privilege, since that's the delicious irony you created a thread about.
I linked them twice.
Here's the link again: http://www.tolerance.org/author/david-ruenzel
Don't you read anything, yoni?
I'm talking about the articles to which the SPLC's Intelligence Project Coordinator, Heidi Beirich, is referring when she says Reunzel wrote articles on white privilege. The articles you posted (and the ones I've already found) are clearly the second category of articles to which Ms. Beirich referred, "and other topics."
It's clear he was a big fan of Common Core so, perhaps that is one of the other topics to which she is referring.
I'd like to see the articles on white privilege the SPLC says he wrote.
the do ents are still being translated
You really must not have a life.
But, nice evasion of the question, why would the SPLC say he had written, for them, about white privilege if, in fact, he hadn't?
It's reasonable for the SPLC to describe at least two of those articles as being about "white privilege and other topics" even though the phrase "white privilege" is never used.
"Positive Numbers" deals with disadvantages minorities have later in life because of the low quality of math education they receive. He brings up topics like racial bias in algebra textbooks, etc.
"Crucial Conversations" is all about negative racial stereotypes influencing negative self-image and negative habits.
You are free to keep clinging to the idea that there are other more provocative articles he wrote for the SPLC that suggested that whites deserve to be the victims of black violence because of their privilege, and that those articles mysteriously disappeared for everyone except the author of the American Thinker piece, who has copies of those articles but still decided not to quote any part of them in his blog about them. It reminds me a little of Joseph Smith and the early Mormons, but if that's enough for you, so be it.
Nah, I've lost interest. May he rest in peace.
You were wrong about that, you were wrong about this. Some things never change.
Smilies and tortured interpretations don't change it. Sorry.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
