Thanks FromWayDowntown
That's unbelievable to think about....
It's not just that he has a winning record against every other team -- he's at least 5 games over .500 against every team and is 15 or more games over .500 against more than 80% of the association:
1. DET: 20-15 (+5)
2. MIL: 20-14 (+6)
LAL: 37-31 (+6)
4. MIA: 21-13 (+8)
NY: 21-13 (+8)
6. CHI: 22-12 (+10)
PRT: 39-29 (+10)
8. PNX: 41-29 (+12)
9. CLE: 24-11 (+13)
OKC: 40-27 (+13)
11. PHI: 25-11 (+14)
12. BRK: 25-10 (+15)
TOR: 25-10 (+15)
14. ORL: 26-10 (+16)
15. CHA: 24-7 (+17)
16. BOS: 26-8 (+18)
17. WAS: 27-7 (+20)
ATL: 27-7 (+20)
19. DAL: 47-26 (+21)
HOU: 47-26 (+21)
21. IND: 28-6 (+22)
22. MIN: 46-23 (+23)
23. NO: 36-11 (+25)
UTH: 47-22 (+25)
25. DEN: 48-21 (+27)
26. SAC: 48-20 (+28)
27. MEM: 54-18 (+36)
28. LAC: 54-14 (+40)
29. GST: 55-11 (+44)
Thanks FromWayDowntown
That's unbelievable to think about....
I would have sworn Van Exel had negative win shares with the Spurs, which would make this tweet false (and hilarious). But he had 1.4 win shares with the Spurs in 05-06.
http://www.basketball-reference.com/...vanexni01.html
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)