future victims, for starters
i don't know. do you?
they usually know who their targets are, know what country they're from. it's logical to assume they'd know these sorts of policies, but i can't say for sure. can you say for sure?
future victims, for starters
The cuck ship sailed long ago. 2015 is all about transgender bigotry. Seriously, get some new material.
^ calm lividness
I have no idea. That's why I'm asking
but not really to the US
You might want to take a look at the hostages from countries that allow such negotiations.
I'm sure you haven't
so if the US positioned isn't effected, what's left..the families?
So the law to make it illegal to pay ransom is just there to protect future families while the family with the actual kidnap victim suffers?
it is aimed to deter. if you dont negotiate, there is no benefit to taking hostages. when you start negotiating in an effort to save current victims (which may or may not work), you are also providing further incentive for these incidents to repeat, putting even more people in harms way
its fine though. obama did it, so you need to find a way to tell yourself it was the right thing to do. i get it.
speculation.
But in reality, prosecuting families that have kidnapped members gives them automatic death sentence.
det spurraider illogical conclusion techniqueits fine though. obama did it, so you need to find a way to tell yourself it was the right thing to do. i get it.
except they already rarely prosecuted families who are negotiating ransoms. the only thing they've done is make a public statement of weakness and a willingness to bend over
Meh, the weakness angle is pretty weak.
To get to the main point, prosecuting families that are already enduring emotional anguish and fear is just beating them while they're down. That's really it.
We're the terrorists unaware that the U.S. Rarely prosecuted families who are negotiating ransom?
i have no clue
yeah well according to the article, as ive said a few times now, they already weren't prosecuting them
Really? Upstream you seam pretty convinced they were aware of the law to prosecute was on the books. Why wouldn't they know the law was actively being enforced. You seem to think the kidnappers are pretty well informed as far as I can tell.
the US has a generally known policy of "not negotiating with terrorists." making a public statement that they are now willing to hedge on that is what i'm not happy with
The government position hasn't shifted. Are you conflating official state policy with the potential actions of individual citizens?
That general policy hasn't changed.
He is. Op just hates Obama with his heart soul mind and body.
silly man
But the potential to prosecute was there. Families were receiving mixed messages from different government agencies about how to handle the situations.
http://www.latimes.com/world/middlee...623-story.html
are you being purposely obtuse? the state policy in question is specifically about actions of individual citizens
It appears you have. I would be interested in seeing successful hostage ransoms paid to those held hostage by Middle Easterners.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)