You lost the battle by applying your own rules. Did you hit your head lately? You seem to become forgetful and illogical.
Great comeback!!! Seriously if last nights drubbing couldnt convince you to make a bet you are on the fence on ...then pussy ...still stands. Why dont you crunch the numbers in that big brain of yours and take the bet?
But you won't cuz I smell something ...
Last edited by Killakobe81; 10-23-2015 at 08:01 AM.
huh? That doesn't make any sense. how many rookies have won MVP? But again, I never said I was "on the fence" that Russell was MVP. You say I have faulty logic but your comebacks and examples are pretty moronic tbh and beneath you. You keep using ridiculous scenarios that dont even apply. We were talking Wolves vs. Lakers and later spurs vs. Lakers. I asked you to back up your analysis with a wager and you declined.
But despite all of this we are still cool ... I never let pussy get in the way of friendship.
Did my math and it's not worth it. Both are horrible teams just that ones for great upside and another doesn't.
Again you are getting concepts confused. My examples are to show how illogical you were using extreme cir stances. How you would take unrelated concepts and lead to irrelevant conclusions.
At this point, I don't even know why I was challenged for a bet, I never said lakers < wolves, so why would I take that bet on? If I said so and you challenged me to a bet then I backed off, then I can understand the pussy jabs, but I am not backing out of anything so how is that a pussy move? It's like someone come to you and say flip a coin on $1000. You didn't think it was worth it so you backed off, does that make you a pussy?
And what analysis did I do that I have to back up with a wager? The wolves have upside is an observation not an analysis, the Spurs are a much better team than the lakers and that's pretty much a given. If you want to bet whether the Spurs or lakers have a better record then I'm all for it. If you want me to bet who will be better in two years wolves or lakers then I'm all for it.
Last edited by ambchang; 10-23-2015 at 02:41 PM.
That post alone should make you consider either bet ... did you miss-speak? did you exaggerate? Since you like analogies. IF a gambling insider told you there are reports from practice that this year's UCLA team was horrible at defense outside of their center, takes to many mid range jumpers horrible from 3 horrible in the paint terrible coaching but USC had 2 freshman and a redshirt soph with tremendous upside who would you bet on? In pre-season, both are equally ranked at the bottom of the conference. They play each other game one ... who do you place your money on?
Last edited by Killakobe81; 10-23-2015 at 03:19 PM.
You are trying to pull two different concepts into the same conversation. And you've been trying to do it for weeks.
In you analogy, the answer is I don't know because those things do not relate. It's not like I have to choose one or the other. Why am I forced to choose one?
The lakers are what I described, what was said that wasn't generally the consensus on them?
Dude this thread died already ...are you feeling lonely or bored?
I replied it died, you replied and it's all cool?
Your team sucks. Why are you in total denial? This is nothing new.
You didnt answer my question but your response is telling ...
Because your question was wrongly phrased. You only gave me two choices and neither were the answers.
35 wins, this trash team
So if they would have won this game, you'd concede the 35 wins? You're an idiot.
Regardless, this team is in transition. Enjoy your Spurs and another failure to win a ring this year.
Naruto got
Lube up your booty hole. It's a gonna need it this season.
Transition to what?
Accurate analysis, yet they are somehow even worse than I thoughtThey are going to be worse than people expect IMO..Hibbert and Kobe is the most inefficient duo in the NBA, and they are playing for the worst offensive coach in the league
No perimeter defense, as well..horribly constructed team with little talent and an atrocious coach..can't even envision a scenario where they crack 30 wins..
Their bench will be decent, though..
Lakers fans predicting 30 wins is fine, everybody can be a homer sometimes, but non-Lakers fans that thought they could win 30 wins is just strange IMO..this team has virtually no impact players on either side of the ball..
And their FO as well... http://deadspin.com/lakers-baffled-t...bas-1715364369
Yep.. they will be struggling to win 20 games as fellow bottom dwellers look to have a pulse against all pre-season expectations (Minny, Denver, Portland..)
2-11
last in the west
Taking care of your cats is your forte. Stick to that.
6th seed!
holy - this is too good to be true. i hope you are a man/woman of your word
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote