Non sequitur.
Let me explain you stupid . If you brace and wrap that ankle, when he slips, his ankle doesn't bend or give as much as it should and sends that force to his knees. Are you a ing dimwit?![]()
Non sequitur.
No. Post hoc ergo propter hoc. Correlation does not equal causation. If he'd rolled his ankle while it was taped up it could have translated the torque to his knee. He slipped on a wet spot and his legs went opposite directions. That's going to happen whether your ankle's taped or not. Curry physically banged his knee against the floor when his feet went apart.
Yeah, I know. You read an article and you think that makes you smart. The premise is incorrect. He tried to make a cut at full speed and slipped on a wet spot on the floor. His ankle wasn't part of the equation because his shoe had no adhesion. Ankles don't turn on slippery floors. Anybody that's ever played basketball or actually turned an ankle knows that.
Players that are physically tired are more likely to get injured. So are players who have not warmed up properly. And we conjecture excessively concerning biomechanics.
Now ST is mixing this in a pot with random events (wet spots on floors;entanglement with a jersey) WE don't know a thing about the actual physical condition of these players. Maybe if Curry was indeed tired... Stop. You have not a clue if he was muscle fatigued at the moment his knee went. Or his ankle.
This is ridiculous. The coaches and trainers are on the floor and in the locker room with these guys.
Oh the physics major and engineer is back.
Do keep going.
You know it's likely they beat the Rockets without Draymond Green as well. But he is not the MVP so you don't sit him?
The playoffs. The best players play.
There is good enough reason to have su ion given Curry's performance in that game up to that point vs his performance in games prior to his latest ankle injury that he was indeed favoring that ankle, and that he could have moved in a way to protect that ankle which resulted in knee damage. There's also reason to suspect his ankle brace played at least some part in his knee injury. Those two su ions at least have physics and probability behind them. Your rebuttal is basically "nuh uh" because you are defending Kerr.
I don't give a about Kerr. Curry slipped on the floor with his ing left leg, and you guys think his right ankle had something to do with it. I'm calling you out for saying stupid .
No, you're arguing irrationally for basically no reason. You've totally ignored Curry's performance prior to the knee injury, intentionally I presume. The unCurry-like performance was a marker that shouldn't go unnoticed in relationship to the injury.
oh... I almost forgot
, ing and .
There, now my argument makes more sense to you.
I ignored his performance prior to slipping on the floor because it's completely unrelated. Exactly as related as the tape on his RIGHT ankle has to do with his LEFT LEG sliding out from under him on a wet spot. There's nothing irrational about pointing out that just because two things happen within a short period of time, it doesn't automatically mean that one is the result of the other.
And you think it's because I love Steve Kerr.
You're an idiot.
Nice tautology there.
But it doesn't negate it and it should be investigated. You've just casually dismissed it because you don't want to accept that poor performance (otherwise unexplained) which could have been caused by favoring a recently injured ankle could have actually allowed the coach to avoid the subsequent injury by deciding his player wasn't playing like someone who was fully recovered. Now he's looking at another injury but he should feel good because it cannot be related since it's possible for anyone to get hurt slipping (even though the other player who slipped didn't get hurt).Exactly as related as the tape on his RIGHT ankle has to do with his LEFT LEG sliding out from under him on a wet spot. There's nothing irrational about pointing out that just because two things happen within a short period of time, it doesn't automatically mean that one is the result of the other.
I think it's because you have a problem with rational thought and reasonable deduction. You prefer gut feeling, eyeball test. Plus you're a ing idiot (same one who thought Blair was the next coming of Barkley).And you think it's because I love Steve Kerr.
You're an idiot.
His left foot slipped just like his right foot also slipped you stupid . Except his right ankle didn't bend like his left. Watch the ing video you stupid .![]()
You can see on the video that he tried to move his right leg forward but couldn't get his foot to bend that way in time because of his ankle support. The dude knows how to fall properly, just couldn't. He fell on his ing head last year and was ok.
Which ankle was hurt for that one, because by your logic, it's impossible for him to just fall without there being a corresponding injury.
I don't understand how you can be such a ing dumbass.![]()
You doubled down on stupid with hard headed and purposefully obtuse. Your eyeball test has an obstructed view and you have an obstructed colon.
I said that last year the moment it happened and everyone called me an Internet tough guy on here.
![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)