Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 100 of 100
  1. #76
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    Washington Redskins
    Post Count
    57,943
    What a bull call. No way Alsott scored that conversion, no ing way.

  2. #77
    Nostradamas Jr.
    Post Count
    33,691
    It was a total job by the refs

  3. #78
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    Washington Redskins
    Post Count
    57,943
    lol

    the "refs" will be at fault this week Im sure.

    of a game by Chris Simms


    And By the way, thanks to Clinton Portis for finally living up to the FANTASY hype.


    Also, wtf is up with Ladell Betts getting all the carries damn near in the 4th over Portis?

    Isn't Portis the 8 million dollar man thats supposed to do that Gibbs??!?!?
    It is was the Skins fault for not playing defense and being offsides to begin with, but there is no way in that conversion was good when his elbow was down way before the line.

  4. #79
    Nostradamas Jr.
    Post Count
    33,691
    why even have replay if they do not even look at it?????

    It was not even close to a 2 pt conversion....the elbow was down and the ball was 1 ft from the goal....

    THIS !!!

  5. #80
    Roll The Dice Hook Dem's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,877
    Like I said Jim.....put your back in your pants! Game over. Boo Hoo!

  6. #81
    Roll The Dice Hook Dem's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,877
    Head lineman made the initial call. He was right there! You weren't. Not enough evidence to overturn it. Put it in the books!

  7. #82
    You couldn't see the BALL, Jim. No vision, no overturn. It's the 'Skins own fault anyway, for going offsides on the kick attempt. If not for that, we'd be running to get our OT beverages.

  8. #83
    Roll The Dice Hook Dem's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,877
    It is was the Skins fault for not playing defense and being offsides to begin with, but there is no way in that conversion was good when his elbow was down way before the line.
    You were looking at his left elbow Manny. Ball was in the right hand. Head lineman saw it and made the call. Good call!

  9. #84
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    Washington Redskins
    Post Count
    57,943
    Hook, the endzone camera showed his right elbow being down well before the line. The ball was behind that elbow, so there was no way it could have crossed the plain. It was a bad call anyway you spin it, and I understand why the refs upstairs didn't overturn it, but it was a bad call none the less.

  10. #85
    I won vBookie cash, so F Washington...that is, F them more than usual. I was the only TB bettor.

  11. #86
    Roll The Dice Hook Dem's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,877
    Hook, the endzone camera showed his right elbow being down well before the line. The ball was behind that elbow, so there was no way it could have crossed the plain. It was a bad call anyway you spin it, and I understand why the refs upstairs didn't overturn it, but it was a bad call none the less.
    What camera were you looking at Manny?????? It clearly showed his left elbow down. Not his right elbow. You couldn't even see the ball in the replay. The ball was in his right hand. You're wrong......take off the homer glasses!

  12. #87
    Roll The Dice Hook Dem's Avatar
    Post Count
    6,877
    I won vBookie cash, so F Washington...that is, F them more than usual. I was the only TB bettor.
    Good call EX.

  13. #88
    Veteran scott's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Cowboys
    Post Count
    20,555
    Chris Simms? Seriously... CHRIS SIMMS? Looks like the 'Skins honeymoon is over... 6-10, here comes the Redskins!

  14. #89
    Crowned
    Post Count
    2,401
    He was on his back, and the left elbow was facing the camera. There is no way you overturn that call. You couldn't tell a single thing from it.

  15. #90
    e^(i*pi) + 1 = 0 MannyIsGod's Avatar
    My Team
    Washington Redskins
    Post Count
    57,943
    Dude you guys not see the RIGHT elbow from the ENDZONE camerra? Even the guys in the booth agreed that it wasn't an actual score!

  16. #91
    Crowned
    Post Count
    2,401
    Everything I saw was not enough to overturn it. Not saying he did or didn't get in - just saying it has to be indisputable. If he had been called down outside, there wouldn't have been enough evidence to turn it the other way.

  17. #92
    RIP whottt. slayermin's Avatar
    Post Count
    5,011
    Alstott's elbow was down.

    But I was more disappointed with the last series. There was plenty of time to get a first down and move the chains. I thought Brunell pressed a little on 3rd and 4th down.

  18. #93
    You can't handle The Truth TheTruth's Avatar
    Post Count
    11,101
    Skins best keep losing.
    Daddy needs a new Left Tackle.

  19. #94
    Nostradamas Jr.
    Post Count
    33,691
    Dan Patrick and Michael Irvin both said that Washington won the game and got screwed...anyone with a brain saw that it was a HORRIBLE call.

    But it...on to Oakland this week.

  20. #95
    The Sean Marks Dance Duff McCartney's Avatar
    Post Count
    9,190
    Does an elbow even count as someone being down?

  21. #96
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    Post Count
    18,446
    If the elbow was down or not, they didn't overturn it. Game over. Who cares, move along to the next game. That game is over with.

  22. #97
    Bruce Bowen 2.0 Horry For 3!'s Avatar
    Post Count
    18,446
    By the way, Cowboys are in 1st place now.

  23. #98
    Yes, the Redskins got ED...

    but do you know how BIG the balls would have had to been on the ref to overturn that call in tampa?

    it wasn't gonna happen.

    we had a minute to go down the field. the Skins failed.

    Tampa was the better team on Sunday.

    But the Skins are for real, cuz I know tampa is damn good, and that was without our starting DT Griffin or starting SS Taylor.

    Be afraid NFL.

    The REDSKINS are coming...

    i'm still thinking 9-7 or hopefully, 10-6...we shall see...

    and in the playoffs?

    i just want a shot at either Tampa or Carolina...those are the two best teams in the NFC.

    AFC is pittsburgh vs indy...

  24. #99
    RIP whottt. slayermin's Avatar
    Post Count
    5,011
    Let see, two out of three against Philly, the Pokes, and NY. Take three out of four against Ari, Stl, Oak, and SD. And that would be 10-6.

    Just had to share something. I love the Redskins and I thought I loved the "Hail to the Redskins" song but after my experience at Hollywood Billiards Sunday, I'm not so sure anymore. It was my first time there for NFL games and needless to say, it gets rowdy. Everytime the Skins would score a touchdown, the Washington corner of the Sports Bar would sing "Hail to the Redskins." I can't say I joined in. I mean, maybe once it's cool. Twice is a little much. The third and fourth renditions are irritating as .

    There was this one Jets Fan, who happened to be pissed off because the Jets just got their azz whupped, was the most irritated by the song. He was a pretty big dude, kinda looked South American.

    He came over and shouted, "The Redskins have a chinamen's chance of making it the Bowl. You guys are going to be watching the game from the same place I'll be watching, at home."

    There was this one Redskins fan wearing a Theismann Jersey who didn't appreciate the smack and yelled, "Aren't you watching the wrong t.v?"

    Then the Jets Fan started getting pissed and fired back with, "You better watch it or I'll go L.T. on your azz. "

    After the L.T. crack, the whole Redskins corner got quiet. Anyway, I found the whole incident amusing as . I will have to go back next week and see how it is early in the morning.

    Bottom line, the indoor version of "Hail to the Redskins" should not be sung more than twice a game, imo.

  25. #100
    Bottom line, the indoor version of "Hail to the Redskins" should not be sung more than twice a game, imo.

    i can wholeheartedly agree with this.

    once, after a victory, is more than sufficient if not at the actual game.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •