I don't dislike his style play, just his commitment and effort.. that's probably what you mean though![]()
Duncan never missed the playoffs, Kobe did
![]()
I don't dislike his style play, just his commitment and effort.. that's probably what you mean though![]()
crofl
lol playff streak argument
By that logic, Blazers are the GOATs
lol going tothe playoffs every year and not repeating
The 2003 Spurs squad was absolute garbage outside of prime Tim Duncan and his 2003 run is one of the GOAT playoff performances and his Game 6 is the single most dominant game by any player on both sides of the court in NBA history
well at least he threw out there a real unpopular opinion tbh that was the point of the thread
David was an athletic freak, but the Iceman was a more skilled basketball player.
Lefty did not know the difference between an opinion and a fact![]()
I do think Spurs could have had the B2B in 2013 and 14 finals... If not for a series of unfortunate events and meltdown.
I don't think that had they won in 2013, the fire wouldn't have been there for 2014, that's bull by ppl who want to justify and explain away the painful 2013 game 6 debacle.
We all secretly miss Matt Bonner.
Facts
Only facts matter
your opinion clown!
Tony Parker could have done better than Eva Longoria and Erin Barry.
Top 5 to a top 5. Respect.![]()
Made the same post but my phone did something to it... It became tonys team 2012-14 and he had a fantastic run of wcf and B2b finals but 09 was still Timmy and 10-11 was manu's brief period as team leader, unfortunately for the spurs dirk broke manu's nose in the 10 playoffs and grant Hill broke his arm right before the 2011 playoffs. 12 onward manu's role steadily diminished
Parker missed a third of the season 2010 and got benched for Hill in the playoffs, how on earth was it his team?
GSH delete that dude. Obscenity gets blocked in here. I mean no one wants to see that .
Sennheiser HD598's should be the Spurs headphones of choice, prior to games. Those things are great.
Absolutely. That shouldn't even be controversial. They were 1 rebound or 1 free throw away from winning the '13 Finals. It was one of the most unlikely events in sports history that they lost at that point. For all intents and purposes, they did repeat as champions...minus one rebound. (Well, at least we can say they repeated as Western conference champs, which is actually a notable accomplishment in its own right.)
That's actually a popular opinion. I agree that it was a relatively weak le team, and that '03 Duncan had one of the best playoff runs of all time. But I wouldn't say it was total garbage. They had some good role players: a solid backup PG (Claxton), a solid backup center (Willis), two solid X-factors (Jackson and Ginobili), a defensive specialist to shut down the opposing team's best wing player (Bowen), and a group of shooting specialists (Kerr, Smith, Ferry). That's exactly what Prime Duncan needed around him to win a le. And they did.
Only an irrational person or insecure troll would disagree.
Had the '12-'15 Spurs been younger, I'd understand not wanting to break that up for anything short of a truly elite player. I could even understand not pursuing Aldridge if San Antonio were more of a destination city. Neither were the case, so you'd have to be out of your mind to turn down a top 15-20 player, especially when what was lost in the process was so minimal.
The decline of this team isn't about Aldridge, it's about long overdue and inevitable aging.
If he wouldve won Finals MVP in '13, he woyld be seen as a truly equal member of the big 3. But hes seen as the lesser of the 3
Patty Mills is getting up there in the ranking of most overrated Spurs players ever (for his ability)..
I guess OP needed a new player to hate on since Aldridge has been on fire lately.
Regular season meltdowns. got spursfans.![]()
Had the Spurs won the 2013 le they would not have won the 2014 le.
2014 team was on a mission.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)