"'Murica Sucks! What? Banned? Let's PROTEST!"

[DMC]

it was great i spent less than 12 straight hours posting on spurs talk
thanks for asking

Under this alias or the one you won't face me with?

[Reck]

lol anyone can find a name and say it's them. I proved to you that your rebuttal above was bull . Now you're acting all felt up like you're fat or something.

ROFL, no.

I dont even have to tell you're the one butthurt. The people that have been posting in and out can tell by themselves. You think that you are looking like a normal, compose dude while in reality you're just flailing your arms like an idiot all this time.

The fact that you are telling me who I'm supposed to be is the real winner though. Nothing points to what you say I am but my posting history here backs me up on who I say I am.

Like for example, I can show you plenty of posts of mine on this board about NASCAR, F1 and racing in general and none about War of Warcraft or whatever you think I am.

You're losing the fight.

[hater]

Wow yall jiggas got no lives

[FuzzyLumpkins]

You just said I used the word incorrectly. You don't get to pose strawmen and challenge me to battle them. I said "worldwide" and you said "entire world, one brain". Don't pretend you weren't being a got. I'm smarter than you, it's about time you got over it.

And I pointed out that your current distinction is that you didn't mean all people worldwide you just meant all the people worldwide protesting.

It's just as stupid for all your dissembling.

I do like how you crow about your relative intelligence though.

[Adam Lambert]

Now you're doing what you just accused me of doing. Didn't I take a huge on you earlier?

1 - no, that post took considerably less than 12 hours
2 - it was , yes

[DMC]

And I pointed out that your current distinction is that you didn't mean all people worldwide you just meant all the people worldwide protesting.

It's just as stupid for all your dissembling.

I do like how you crow about your relative intelligence though.

Maybe I didn't mean either since I didn't say either. I'm smart, you're not.

[DMC]

ROFL, no.

I dont even have to tell you're the one butthurt. The people that have been posting in and out can tell by themselves. You think that you are looking like a normal, compose dude while in reality you're just flailing your arms like an idiot all this time.

The fact that you are telling me who I'm supposed to be is the real winner though. Nothing points to what you say I am but my posting history here backs me up on who I say I am.

Like for example, I can show you plenty of posts of mine on this board about NASCAR, F1 and racing in general and none about War of Warcraft or whatever you think I am.

You're losing the fight.

2008.

[DMC]

1 - no, that post took considerably less than 12 hours
2 - it was , yes

Did you get it washed off? How's your s/o?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Maybe I didn't mean either since I didn't say either. I'm smart, you're not.

You said that you were surprised that the protesters weren't happy after saying " yet america is the worst in the world." How do you get to that conclusion if they did not all also think that?


I do understand why you want to dissemble from that stupidity though.

[DMC]

You said that you were surprised that the protesters weren't happy after saying " yet america is the worst in the world." How do you get to that conclusion if they did not all also think that?


I do understand why you want to dissemble from that stupidity though.

Did I say anything about "one brain"?

[Reck]

Maybe I didn't mean either since I didn't say either. I'm smart, you're not.

Someone that has to state they're smart is probably not.

I'm going to go with...you're dumb as so sing along..

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Did I say anything about "one brain"?

Answering a question with a question. Not explicitly but it is there just the same.

Again how do you get to the conclusion that they should be happy if they did not all also think that "America was the worst in the world."

[DMC]

Answering a question with a question. Not explicitly but it is there just the same.

Again how do you get to the conclusion that they should be happy if they did not all also think that "America was the worst in the world."

So instead of addressing what I said, you inferred your own meaning and from there launched your narrative, and now are hoping I will go out to joust those windmills you keep erecting.

Fuzzy, so typical of a liberal got.

[DMC]

Someone that has to state they're smart is probably not.

I'm going to go with...you're dumb as so sing along..

2008 Shadowflames... 2000 and ing 8.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

So instead of addressing what I said, you inferred your own meaning and from there launched your narrative, and now are hoping I will go out to joust those windmills you keep erecting.

Fuzzy, so typical of a liberal got.

I answered your question directly and quoted what you said and addressed it directly. Youre quite the coward with this most recent tactic.

Your OP says that there are protests around the world but they should be happy they are not allowed in because they think America sucks. It's mindnumbingly stupid and smacks of something that you regurgitated from elsewhere.

[Reck]

2008 Shadowflames... 2000 and ing 8.

Oh look another failing shtick.

[DMC]

I answered your question directly and quoted what you said and addressed it directly. Youre quite the coward with this most recent tactic.

Your OP says that there are protests around the world but they should be happy they are not allowed in because they think America sucks. It's mindnumbingly stupid and smacks of something that you regurgitated from elsewhere.

I said worldwide. Same thing you said in another thread but somehow that didn't mean "entire world". Odd.. isn't it?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

I said worldwide. Same thing you said in another thread but somehow that didn't mean "entire world". Odd.. isn't it?

Remember when you falsely accused me of not addressing what you said? What does this make you?

Your distinction is worldwide protesters all think with the same brain as opposed to people worldwide as if that makes it any better. You dodge like Trump did the draft. And yes it means protesters over the entire world.

[DMC]

Remember when you falsely accused me of not addressing what you said? What does this make you?

Your distinction is worldwide protesters all think with the same brain as opposed to people worldwide as if that makes it any better. You dodge like Trump did the draft. And yes it means protesters over the entire world.

Wrong again. For someone who fancies themselves a savant you sure don't seem to latch on to quickly. You can have a rope over your house but that doesn't mean your entire house is covered in rope. Signals that span the globe don't necessarily reach every point on the planet. You do understand the difference between inclusion and exclusion, right? Do you have any harmonic ciphering you want to do for us?

You're just a wordier version of chumpdumpster.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Wrong again. For someone who fancies themselves a savant you sure don't seem to latch on to quickly. You can have a rope over your house but that doesn't mean your entire house is covered in rope. Signals that span the globe don't necessarily reach every point on the planet. You do understand the difference between inclusion and exclusion, right? Do you have any harmonic ciphering you want to do for us?

You're just a wordier version of chumpdumpster.

Definition of worldwide
: extended throughout or involving the entire world

It's a distinction without meaning though. You are still saying the worldwide protesters all think with the same brain which is monumentally simpleminded.

You're just a pseudo-intellectual version of TSA.

[DMC]

If Trump wins, we're going to Canada.